On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:21:36AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Mon, December 17, 2012
El jue, 20-12-2012 a las 21:21 -0600, Doug Goldstein escribió:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still
contributing to the distro in
El jue, 20-12-2012 a las 21:21 -0600, Doug Goldstein escribió:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still
contributing to the distro in
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 07:02:06 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
No one has proposed moving everything to /usr. At the minimum, we would
still have /etc and /var in /, as well as various mountpoints. If we do
move those to
El jue, 20-12-2012 a las 21:30 -0800, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. escribió:
On 12/20/12 7:21 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
3. I think what's important is to keep packages maintained. I consider
maintainership to be a duty, not a privilege. If someone is listed in
metadata.xml, but is not really maintaining the package, that creates a
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 21:30 -0800, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 12/20/12 7:21 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too thin,
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:10:22 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec
On 21 December 2012 03:21, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still
contributing to the
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:10:22 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On
On 21 December 2012 06:09, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:33:55 -0500 as excerpted:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I could MAYBE understand it if they're consuming some valuable resource
that we need to
On 21 December 2012 08:49, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 21:30 -0800, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 12/20/12 7:21 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
Just let me know when you have to maintain a lot of such systemd
and upgrade, say, glibc. Then maybe you'll understand.
A shared /usr means I need to
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
Just let me know when you have to maintain a lot of such systemd
and upgrade, say, glibc.
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
Just let me
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like the
existing policy, bring it to the list with a better
attitude so we can try and discuss it. But given that you want to pick
a fight with your email, I
On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like the
existing policy, bring it to the list with a better
attitude so we
On 21 December 2012 18:02, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and
apparently most others, don't bother to read. I'm not sure if you're
aware of this.
Someone said on IRC this morning in response to this thread
the tragic thing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
well.
Just to be clear, by init* you mean {initrd,initramfs} , correct?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and
apparently most others, don't bother to read. I'm not sure if you're
aware of this.
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
well.
Just to be clear, by init* you mean {initrd,initramfs} ,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
well.
Just to be clear, by init* you mean {initrd,initramfs} , correct?
Seems likely.
However, for the most
Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and
apparently most others, don't bother to read. I'm not sure if you're
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
well.
Just to be clear, by init* you mean
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:52:00 AM Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the
Michael Mol posted on Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:51:09 -0500 as excerpted:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and
apparently most
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
well.
Just to be clear, by init* you mean
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:52:00 AM Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 12:48 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 10:46 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 21 December 2012 08:49, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 21:30 -0800, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I have several suggestions how we can improve things:
1. 3 months is too short period anyway.
2. Think
10.12.2012 11:05, Sergey Popov пишет:
Some time ago, there was one bugreport[1] about obsolete mask entries in
package.mask files in diffirent profiles. Bug is assigned to QA team,
but only amd64 no-multilib profile was cleaned up, as i know.
Maybe we should add arch teams, whose profiles
Stelian Ionescu sione...@cddr.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 12:48 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny
Markos Chandras wrote:
I'm really just trying to understand the sense in this.
--
Doug Goldstein
Your tone is not appropriate for discussion.
Sorry Markos, I disagree with you. Doug makes it abundantly clear
that he wants to understand. I think we can all recognize that, in
particular
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of
On 21/12/2012 17:16, Peter Stuge wrote:
Leave the account but simply block access. One example implementation
is to move the SSH key to another location, and have a lightweight
method to move it back in place, with an absolute minimum of human
interaction and required time. Done.
I love how
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
However, it is, in my opinion, a workaround for a problem that has
been forced upon me. As soon as eudev is stable enough, I will dump
udev.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/441004
Strange, I use a current-stable version of genkernel, /usr is on
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:36:05PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 10:21:02 AM William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:20:45 PM William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:36:05PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 10:21:02 AM William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM
For further messages in this thread, please keep:
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:08:45PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:25AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:16:25PM -0800, Greg KH
Dear Everyone,
sys-libs/glibc contains LICENSE=LGPL-2, but it would appear to be
subject to roughly a dozen licenses, many of which are not in the tree?
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=LICENSES;h=80f7f1487947f57815b9fe076fadc8c7f94eeb8e;hb=HEAD
I can spot BSD-4, ISC and sun-rpc.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:17:59PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
For further messages in this thread, please keep:
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:08:45PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:25AM +, Robin H.
On 12/21/2012 03:22 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
Dear Everyone,
sys-libs/glibc contains LICENSE=LGPL-2, but it would appear to be
subject to roughly a dozen licenses, many of which are not in the tree?
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Richard Yao wrote:
Dear Everyone, sys-libs/glibc contains LICENSE=LGPL-2, but it
would appear to be subject to roughly a dozen licenses, many of
which are not in the tree?
Markos,
Markos Chandras wrote:
I totally disagree with the way Doug started this thread.
That's of course completely fair, but try to look beyond that, and
let's focus on how we can make things better for everyone.
Calling us brain dead ?
Please read email even more carefully, especially
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:01:00AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Greg KH gre...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:25AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
1. Are you party to any *copyright assignment* (eg FSF copyright
assignment)?
You need to
On 21 December 2012 22:50, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos,
[...]
Maybe you can understand that there is a disconnect between what
people who have no experience from what you do and what you actually
do? That was certainly the case for me, and maybe also for Doug. The
documentation
49 matches
Mail list logo
