Steev contacted me few hours ago to tell me he won't maintain dbacl
anymore and, then, it's now up for grabs.
Thanks for taking care of it
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the
council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an
initramfs, I am re-considering
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no reason we /can't/ have a comparable process for CVS to
eliminate needless slopping of files around in pastebins/emails, both
of which are time consuming and not designed for doing exactly that.
...
(lots of
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:42:27 +
Tony \Chainsaw\ Vroon chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
In less than two weeks, on Tuesday January the 8th, the council will meet
again.
Now is the time to prepare raise items that you feel should be put to a
vote.
Please reply to this e-mail with any
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012, 14:37:37 schrieb Michał Górny:
a) adding new profiles which will require EAPI=5 and requiring all
users to migrate to them after upgrading portage. Using new
use.stable.mask files in those profiles.
b) adding new profiles (with current EAPIs) and requesting
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:55:38AM +, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the
council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an
initramfs, I am re-considering this.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the
council has not mandated that we
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
Actually, since
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:35:55PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
As I and others have said on this list a thousdand times, moving
everything to /usr never had anything to do with systemd and udev. This
is a completely separate topic.
Understood. However, the whole request to not
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:49:50PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
As I and others have said on this list a thousdand times, moving
everything to /usr never had anything to do with systemd and udev. This
is a completely
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:37:37 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
c) 'fixing' the use.stable.mask feature and wording it in such a way
that it would apply to EAPI 5 (or 6) packages independently of
profiles EAPI.
So what EAPI would be used to parse use.stable.mask?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:49:50PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Understood. However, the whole request to not have to support a
separate /usr without an initramfs was brought up by the udev team.
If udev doesn't have the
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 15:14 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Go bring up the suggestion that the kernel should support direct
booting on lkml
And be pointed at EFI_STUB functionality. Next?
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 15:14 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Go bring up the suggestion that the kernel should support direct
booting on lkml
And be pointed at EFI_STUB functionality. Next?
I was referring to booting
Quoting Pacho Ramos (2012-12-27 12:20:11)
Steev contacted me few hours ago to tell me he won't maintain dbacl
anymore and, then, it's now up for grabs.
Thanks for taking care of it
If nobody is interested I can take it.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: signature
On 12/27/2012 05:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
EAPI 5 provides use.stable.mask files to solve this but those files
require profiles to be EAPI 5. Therefore, in order to be able to use it
we would have to actually break the update path for older portage
versions completely.
So, adding new
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:56:47 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:37:37 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
c) 'fixing' the use.stable.mask feature and wording it in such a way
that it would apply to EAPI 5 (or 6) packages independently
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:41:08 -0800
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/27/2012 05:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
EAPI 5 provides use.stable.mask files to solve this but those files
require profiles to be EAPI 5. Therefore, in order to be able to use it
we would have to actually break
On Wednesday 26 December 2012 23:01:46 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:48:23PM +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 24/12/2012 20:08, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i.e. saying we should get rid of gen_usr_ldscript and use
--libdir=/lib makes absolutely no sense. it's just begging
On Thursday 27 December 2012 13:49:50 Rich Freeman wrote:
I think moving everything into /usr is a good idea. However:
i don't think it's hard to support both. the majority of packages just want
to relocate shared libs into / from /usr and that's easy with one line:
gen_usr_ldscript
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:14:37PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Something I don't like about this whole debate is that it tends to
come off as I've never run an initramfs and darn it I want to keep it
that way. Gentoo has always been a cutting-edge/innovative distro.
We have prefix, hardened,
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012, 14:37:37 schrieb Michał Górny:
a) adding new profiles which will require EAPI=5 and requiring all
users to migrate to them after upgrading portage. Using new
use.stable.mask files in those profiles.
OK here's one way how we could pull option a) through.
On 12/27/2012 03:40 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012, 14:37:37 schrieb Michał Górny:
a) adding new profiles which will require EAPI=5 and requiring all
users to migrate to them after upgrading portage. Using new
use.stable.mask files in those profiles.
OK
24 matches
Mail list logo
