Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

On 03/15/2017 08:12 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:55:44 -0400 > > > Agreed, but I was under the impression that sometimes sec. team was > waiting for cleanup to close a bug. If you've just done the analysis > that it is the only thing left, just do it and close the bug,

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix slot operator rebuild for llvm:0 to llvm:4 upgrade (bug 612772)

Fix check_reverse_dependencies to ignore dependencies of parent packages that could be uninstalled in order to solve a blocker conflict. This case is similar to the one from bug 584626, except that the relevant parent package is in an older slot which is blocked by a newer slot. In this case, the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix slot operator rebuild for llvm:0 to llvm:4 upgrade (bug 612772)

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:23:43 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> Fix check_reverse_dependencies to ignore dependencies of parent >> packages that could be uninstalled in order to solve a blocker >> conflict.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] movefile: support in-kernel file copying on Linux (bug 607868)

On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:18:50 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > Perform in-kernel file copying when possible, and also support > reflinks and sparse files. If the optimized implementation > fails at runtime, gracefully fallback to a plain read/write > loop. > > Compile-time and

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] Change how the tmp file for the commit msg is made (bug 571546)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, 23 May 2016 12:43:04 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > I see you have incorporated Zac's feedback by using shutil. You have > also incorporated my feedback on the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] movefile: support in-kernel file copying on Linux (bug 607868)

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:18:50 -0800 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> Perform in-kernel file copying when possible, and also support >> reflinks and sparse files. If the optimized implementation >> fails at

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PROPOSAL] Don't split user visible messages across multiple lines

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:33:28 +0200 Alexandru Elisei wrote: > I was working on emerge --sync and my test repo configuration > generated several warning messages. Finding the exact location where > the warnings was generated was surprisingly difficult because the >

[gentoo-dev] slight behaviour change of clock service in openrc-0.24.1

All, this is a heads-up more than anything; I don't think it is major. I wrote an entry about it in the NEWS.md file of openrc-0.21.4. There is no action for users, so I don't think it is a newsitem, but there might be action for developers. In a nutshell, if you have a service that should be

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:55:44 -0400 Yury German wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2017, at 4:14 AM, Alexis Ballier > > wrote: > > > > > > Also, it'd be nice to have something more formal for sec. cleanup: > > "After 30 days a sec. issue has been fixed, sec. team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused profiles

W dniu 14.03.2017, wto o godzinie 17∶19 -0700, użytkownik Jack Morgan napisał: > > On 01/19/17 09:08, Michał Górny wrote: > > (CC-ing a lot of potentially interested teams) > > > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've did a quick sweep of profiles/ directory for unused profiles. > > Unused means: not