[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/args

2020-09-13 Thread Louis Sautier
# Louis Sautier (2020-09-13) # Masked for removal in 30 days, unmaintained, no more revdeps. dev-python/args signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-09-13 Thread Martin Dummer
On 2020-04-14 10:36, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > here's a list of packages recently dropped to maintainer-needed due to > retirement of multiple inactive proxied maintainers. > > (b) = open bugs, > (v) = new version is available. > app-backup/rear (b,v) > Hi, In the meantime I decided to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-*.eclass: Create sysusers.d files

2020-09-13 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-09-13 13:21, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > So it will be reasonable to add USE="systemd" to acct-* eclasses > to control the changes proposed above. Having thought about this some more, another benefit of this approach would be - unless I am wrong of course - that all currently installed

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-*.eclass: Create sysusers.d files

2020-09-13 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:53:45 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Thanks to David Michael for the initial patch and upstream fixes. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/acct-group.eclass | 16 +++- > eclass/acct-user.eclass | 16 +++- > 2 files changed, 30

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Services and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace

2020-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-09-13 at 20:31 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > You maybe all remember what happened to stable-bot: Years ago, > kensington created stable-bot on his own as PoC which revolutionized the > way how we do package stabilization in bugzilla. The service run on his > own infrastructure.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-09-13 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:19:51 +0300 Joonas Niilola wrote: > here's a list of few packages dropped to maintainer-needed due to > retirement of inactive    maintainers. > > b = bugs open, > v = new version available. > > app-arch/lha Taken. Amiga forever! ;) > app-arch/unarj b This is

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-arch/unarj

2020-09-13 Thread James Le Cuirot
# James Le Cuirot (2020-09-13) # License issues. app-arch/arj is a better alternative. Removal in 30 # days. See bug #694746. app-arch/unarj -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgpz225rDDqkd.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-*.eclass: Create sysusers.d files

2020-09-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 7:21 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:53:45 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Thanks to David Michael for the initial patch and upstream fixes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > > --- > > eclass/acct-group.eclass | 16 +++- > >

[gentoo-dev] rfc: kubernetes packaging

2020-09-13 Thread William Hubbs
All, I would like to get some thoughts on kubernetes packaging. When I started maintaining it in Gentoo, it was packaged as 7 ebuilds (one per executable), and only one of them was marked stable. Since we normally do not split up monorepos into separate packages, I started moving everything

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-09-13 23:59 UTC

2020-09-13 Thread Robin H. Johnson
/consul_exporter 20200913-05:14 williamh 7800656ec37 acct-group/mongodb_exporter 20200907-21:32 williamh a10d9e9094a acct-user/consul_exporter20200913-05:20 williamh 3dcdabe724c acct-user/mongodb_exporter 20200907-21:39 williamh fce980b4852 app-dicts

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Services and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace

2020-09-13 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, TL;DR: jstein asked council [Bug 729062] for a motion that any service and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace. Because any request to council must be discussed I volunteered to bring this topic to the mailing list (sorry for the huge delay!).

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Services and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace

2020-09-13 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:31 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Hi, > > TL;DR: jstein asked council [Bug 729062] for a motion that any service > and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in > Gentoo namespace. Because any request to council must be discussed I > volunteered

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Services and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace

2020-09-13 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:04:39 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > Is openrc critical to Gentoo? it doesn't live on our infra. > Is pkgcore critical to Gentoo? it doesn't live on our infra. Both those things are "things employed by users for their systems". Neither of those things are integral to any