be
considered.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpihV2nntyQf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
a more functional product that does the same
thing and more with the same good interface.
be happy that another gentoo package doesn't need horrible patching and all
the stuff that Brenden and joemyre fixed up with Conky.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded
the
same way
Ditto - please take it away
... i'm 100% uClibc now ;)
If no one complains, I'll take this package.
check with hansmi/dragonheart, but i know i dont care
-mike
I
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgptaR1ZHXr06.pgp
Description: PGP
I've taken the simple approach and just removed torsmo. It was in the
package.mask for 2-3 weeks.
Users can emerge conky and rename their configuration file (~/.torsmorc to
~/.conkyrc) and should get similar result.
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:08 pm, Daniel wrote:
Torsmo has been inactive upstream
in addition to
kxdocker and kxdocker-resources (currently under kde-misc).
http://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=124159
Rather than littering kde-misc with more applications I propose using
kde-kxdocker instead.
Any objections/thoughts/sporadic opinions?
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED
prepares for some more fun exams.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Stuff
pgpkPKEbM0ddI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of users.
~harring
I'd be really happy to see it added. Since there really no objection who
controls the staging server enough to implement this? I'm happy to write up a
bug report but I'm not sure who to assign it to.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
.tar.gz
net-wireless/aircrack-2.1 aircrack-2.1.tgz fetcher return no uris succeeded
http://www.cr0.net:8040/code/network/aircrack-2.1.tgz
Problem with ftp/no port 80 parsing?
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpqvPbgGVd4T.pgp
Description: PGP
Aaron.
Aaron Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim |
web-apps ]
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpbF7lXaWNTL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-0.6.4-r4.ebuild
Have fun and don't say I never think of you.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon/PPC
pgpJvE8no57am.pgp
Description: PGP signature
at consolidating the
bug fixes with an aim to take over maintenance of this package.
Please also take into the account the gentoo-dev thread titled
'/etc/profile.d/' that took place in July 2005.
Apologies for neglecting it so long.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I like it - well done Marius.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpD3JojbdJir.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for inclusion.
add a patch to bugs.g.o? pass it directly to
torsmo? or something else.
Direct to conky is prefered. http;//conky.sf.net
I'm still writing it, so nothing pressing yet.
I'm hoping so. Sorry I missed your original post.
Lares
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC
to try it
out. Also DevStack is another common platform people use to test with.
Just throwing my 2 cents into the conversation
- Daniel
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 06/08/2015 01:38 PM, wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
On 06/08/2015 10:30 AM
'Board of
Directors' in this book is.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpD27FoRXXBc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
reading it that weren't involed in the implementaiton so that know
that unless the repo is actually named 'repoid' no such file will exist.
Thanks and +1,
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpFHo5aPMVVn.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13973 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
I can't remember how I ended up maintaining this.
I'm not even too sure what it does - I don't use it. It's some kind of
web grabber thingy. Upstream is alive. http://pavuk.sourceforge.net/
Does anyone want to take this package? It also comes with 2 bonus bugs:
114189 and 118287.
Daniel
Daniel Drake wrote:
Does anyone want to take this package? It also comes with 2 bonus bugs:
114189 and 118287.
vanquirius took it. Thanks!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to hear
any comments on the above and similar suggestions that others may have.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
for the feedback.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
be corrected :)
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Isn't XSESSION *only* used by display managers? I know for a fact that
it isn't used by startx or anything.
It is used by startx. The following commands have their expected effect:
# XSESSION=fluxbox startx
# XSESSION=gnome startx
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
isn't the intention), but in practice I think that won't
happen too much if you treat the contributor in the proper manner.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14485 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
I'll contact the council separately, and ask that they look at two
things:
a) What the QA team is and isn't empowered to do
b) The approval process that the QA team must follow before imposing
tree-wide changes on other developers.
According to prior council meeting logs:
15:14 @vapier QA
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 21:54 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 13:29 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Simply tell the user to download X and place it in $DISTDIR renaming it
to X-foo-bar, where's you've chosen X-foo-bar to avoid conflicts.
That works for me.
Best regards,
On Sunday 26 February 2006 16:58, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:22:17 -0500 Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Yes, Gentoo is supposed to be fun, but we also have a responsibility
| to our users to ensure we are providing them with the best possible
| distro we can.
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:17 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
That would work for fetch restricted packages, not nomirrored ones.
--Dan
/me nods. That's what we'll have to do. Unfortunately, it leaves users
with a worse experience
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14452 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
not really (don't mean to trivialize the work that
Mr_Bones_ does). It is something that I believe we need so lets all help
with the transition instead of fighting it.
Thanks,
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpjoHYyUIVpq.pgp
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14535 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
your point about needing to manually change the packages
that do explicitly state mirror://gentoo in their SRC_URI, but given that you
would have to do the above anyway
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgppxjDgRp6ds.pgp
On Monday 06 March 2006 13:18, Simon Stelling wrote:
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
Hrm, /me thinks you are missing something there, almost the entire tree
doesn't explicitly state the mirror://gentoo SRC_URI, portage handles
that automatically. That being the case portage would have change so
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14662 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
21 and remove 30 days later.
Because I am working on the next version and this product is not dead ?
Daniel Glazman, Nvu engineering lead
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
126972.
Thanks!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
wouldn't be too happy.
resolvconf-gentoo would be a good choice
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
/article.asp?p=23200seqNum=3
which is part of a (very good) larger article detailing why Linux kernel
development works so well.
Any ideas?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
the gap between the user community and the developer
community, and how the developer community can open up.
Thanks for the feedback - it's always interesting to read this kind of
thing, but it's not what I'm looking for at this point.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
acceptance of the occasional contribution
how about that as proxy?
Daniel
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
official the overlays actually were, e.g. how prone
the team looking after the overlay would be to accepting bugs via the usual
b.g.o channels etc.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpwacZblRAun.pgp
Description: PGP signature
) -or- it is an Official overlay with official support which means it
needs to abide by the rules...
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpQyEPKB2Xy4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:15 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Asking developers to proxy takes almost as much time as it does to
ask them to maintain a package by themselves.
wrong
The developer is
directly responsible for anything he commits, so he will have to still
test the ebuild, still test
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:34 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
On 3/23/06, Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:15 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Asking developers to proxy takes almost as much time as it does to
ask them to maintain a package by themselves.
wrong
,
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpKBvrnkBVTM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 24 March 2006 15:06, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
On Friday 24 March 2006 14:35, Grant Goodyear wrote:
After reading through that fairly lengthy thread, I'm afraid that I can
no longer tell exactly what is being proposed. Who has read access?
Who has write access? Bugs are handled where
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 20:04 -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As many are aware nss-3.11 and nspr-4.6.1 are in the tree. Many
packages still set the {nss|nspr}-libs and includes. With
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14963 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 19:18 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:55, Mark Loeser wrote:
Not directed specifically at you, but it seems a lot of people are
masking stuff and removing it very quickly, and I'd really like to see
everyone wait the 30 days to remove
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 01:17 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Monday 03 April 2006 00:29, foser wrote:
Already security related issues have been dropped by upstream for the
simple reason that it hasn't been maintained since the day gtk went
2.0 .
Why didn't you file (Gentoo) security bugs?
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 21:20 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Sunday 02 April 2006 04:48, Daniel Goller wrote:
exactly, what's the point of removing it so fast? give people a chance
to miss it, it does not matter if it's removed or masked only as far as
going woah, what? and if masked
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15047 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
Linux 2.6.16 will be in the tree very soon. Assuming there aren't any
major problems, we'll hopefully be marking it stable in 2-3 weeks.
We're planning to mark it stable on 10th April. Maybe a few days later,
need to double check that we don't have any in-kernel
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14512 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 09:36 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Eldad Zack wrote:
Hello,
Sometimes it becomes a problem whenever a new release or a tricky bugfix
comes
up for a certain package.
To improve QA we can let our userbase help, especially people who use
certain
packages
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 09:48 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
didn't he ask for people who know a particular application very well?
If you actually read the GLEP, you will note that there is a provision
to expand the idea to include herd testers.
someone might like to help with testing one
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 01:15 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Hi,
It is my pleasure to announce publicly that ian! has passed all
necessary quizzes to touch our holy gra^H^H^H portage tree.
He'll be helping mcummings in his perpetuate combat with perl and its
dependencies. May the source be
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14762 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
it a month from now.
Nice to see the back of this one.
For those that don't know, this hardware is supported through the
in-kernel snd-intel8x0 ALSA driver.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
means maintainer
needed, not buhbye!
severly broken here would mean does not even compile, or gui comes up
but most functions just create a segfault.
In short, i would like to see the above sentence changed to something a
little less radical. (example provided)
Thanks
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14970 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
this in more detail
hope the feedback helps
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFETFkI/aM9DdBw91cRAgQWAKDBuxieQZTwcGw+VC2IGGNaGUnO8gCcDPTJ
H296TQyH7S1dA3NfbscYj5Q=
=ypTj
-END PGP
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFETFpo/aM9DdBw91cRAsBvAKDABphEPy1zWVGaHqqZ8JhBYvOTEgCeNa5B
mwUCZpBBis2TnK3gyejjn9Q=
=/ig2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Daniel Goller posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:50:17 -0500:
* In the case of disagreement on policy among QA members, the majority
of established QA members must agree with the action.
you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser wrote:
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get
think about it and maybe we could go cool.
I like the idea. (But i guess you figured that out already ;)
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEUCVP/aM9DdBw91cRAhwZAJ9iZfCATRYUk6ApxuLaY
relationship
even more, 6 months is a nice time to see if his performance is
consitent too
no dev has to refer anyone to someone else unless they are not long
enough with the project, and then it is only a matter of time :)
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux
and let's
get on with the program
Daniel
darcs
- haskell dependency
- doesn't work on some architectures
- IMHO, deal breaker
svk
- not a contender, it is subversion.
if someone wanted to use svk with the subversion tree they could;
it is transparent to any other.
-ryan
-BEGIN
and then thinking it.
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEU20L/aM9DdBw91cRAkPxAKCNB10kVHzVF+okuTc7Pc1Ysuza5QCcCdZ8
cYBVs1j9tBce2wTlCF7x7Tg=
=WWf3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better
developers, why you think harder tests would cut down more on the quick
in and out people
currently open bugs which i will try to eliminate or at
least minimize as much as possible.
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEWomz/aM9DdBw91cRAuv+AJ9trfMlCXUNv7Iu+H6UtNwqswOAuwCgvVkJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Mylchreest wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:09:39PM -0500, Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Assuming there are no objections I can take over the following.
./app-benchmarks/cpuburn
./app-benchmarks/bonnie++
Regards,
John
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2006 at 10:02:10 +0200, Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be
absorbed into their herds w/o a direct
and will be the first GTK+ 2.x version to go stable (finally!).
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
requirement is that you are a UML user and you have some
interest in it.
Any volunteers?
If not, this package will be removed in 30 days. It will be put in
package.mask sometime over the next day or two due to the open security
bugs.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:40 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
I've been wrangling with usermode-sources maintenance for some time now,
but I don't have any interest in it and have no clue how it works.
Any volunteers?
If not, this package will be removed in 30 days. It will be put
dang is the new maintainer - thanks!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
in the metadata. I
will email the author so that he CC's you on release announcements.
Thanks!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On 5/5/06, Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be
absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15227 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
http://guadec.org/GUADEC2006
Anyone going? Anyone staying in the GNOME village?
I'll be there, with a friend.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15388 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
and Portage have varying feature sets, and do not
maintain total ebuild compatibility both ways. We all know how keen our
users are to try new stuff...
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
snip
Your claim, specifically, was It *is* essential if paludis were to
ever be used for release building.. There is more than one way to skin
a cat, and some of those ways don't involve getting blood all over the
floor.
/snip
Unfortunately in this case there is only one cat, he has only one
the standard English locale
*during portage merges* rather than as a system-wide thing.
Does that change your view at all?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
of
them will have external weblogs anyway.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15470 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15551 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
, the cached read is the only
difference. Cached reads are not a test of hard disk performance, this
is a mostly useless benchmark (note that on that metric, your cdrom
drive performs at the same speed as your hard disk...)
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 20:12 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Peper wrote:
well. A couple of examples:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122500
And again, you use my project of an example. Perhaps you should try
looking at something that actually supports your argument?
I think it's an
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 14:46 -0500, James Potts wrote:
On 6/9/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 19:10 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Markus Ullmann wrote:
Maybe that way we avoid any misunderstandings, nearly doubled posts and
repeating ourselves over
.
Writing hugely demotivating emails, scaring away existing contributors,
and wasting the council's time will not help at all.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Comments inline ...
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 13:37 +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
as
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15545 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 19:04 -0400, Luis Francisco Araujo wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Continuing in the series of issues raised during the previous package
manager discussions, I'd like to continue by mentioning the tree
format. At present, it isn't defined beyond what the current portage
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then?
Yes, because base/make.defaults includes FEATURES=autoconfig and no
profile turns it off.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15664 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
1 - 100 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
