[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass unpacking speedup

2012-11-25 Thread justin
Hi, Change of the unpacking logic which allows at least a speed up of factor 2. Before we unpacked every single rpm from the tarball separately, now we generate all possibilities and unpack them at once, ignoring warnings. Justin commit f13912b377189f6b80d05eb122c9f27e187c02a6 Author: Justin

[gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread Justin
to pass the path to a supported gcc bindir * nvcc calls CXX but doesn't pass CXXFLAGS on. justin # Copyright 1999-20012 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ inherit toolchain-funcs versionator # @ECLASS: cuda.eclass # @MAINTAINER

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread Justin
On 25.11.2012 18:59, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass simply sanitize the NVCCFLAGS. May be extended in the future. Two problems come up

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-25 Thread justin
On 26/11/12 01:26, C. Bergström wrote: On 11/26/12 12:59 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Justin wrote: Hi, I would like to introduce a new eclass for packages using the nvidia cuda compiler suite. Currently the eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh Organizations - Gentoo Linux

2012-11-26 Thread Justin
, let me know if you want to be a manager for the Gentoo organization. Cheers, Dirkjan Thanks both of you for your work, justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass check user license

2012-11-27 Thread justin
-he-is-doing. Thanks justin +# @ECLASS-FUNCTION: big-warning +# @INTERNAL +# warn user that we really require a license +big-warning() { +case ${1} in + pre-check ) +echo +ewarn License file not found! +;; +test-failed ) +echo +ewarn Function test

[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread justin
Hi, next patch for intel-sdp.eclass Problem: Documentation and examples are installed on every system. Also japanese man pages are installed. Solution: Use USE. Thanks justin @@ -93,13 +97,13 @@ LICENSE=Intel-SDP # Future work, #394411 #SLOT=${_INTEL_PV1}.${_INTEL_PV2} SLOT=0 -IUSE

[gentoo-dev] intel-sdp.eclass new version

2012-11-27 Thread justin
Hi, here the complete eclass, as requested on irc. Several minor changes are present: * Drop numerous blank lines * Drop Sebastien as maintainer * Shuffle/Resort variables and functions (without changes) * Write manpage jingle for everything * and probably more. justin # Copyright 1999-2012

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread justin
On 11/27/12 4:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, justin wrote: next patch for intel-sdp.eclass Problem: Documentation and examples are installed on every system. Also japanese man pages are installed. Solution: Use USE. +[[ ${LINGUAS} == *ja_JP

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread justin
On 11/27/12 4:38 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 27/11/2012 04:32, justin wrote: Documentation and examples are installed on every system. Also japanese man pages are installed. Does the documentation take time to build, or is it an external download? If no, don't use a doc USE flag. Do

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread justin
On 11/27/12 5:49 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 27/11/2012 08:01, justin wrote: The reason I introduced the USE here and in general to use it in similar locations is that those packages install tons of documentation and examples, which I personally don't like to waste my diskspace with. What

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass check user license

2012-11-27 Thread justin
On 28/11/12 00:04, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 27 November 2012 07:26:50 justin wrote: next patch for intel-sdp.eclass your code has a lot of whitespace damage (leading spaces instead of tabs). you should fix that up. I am sorry for that and we fix it up. Did some writing on mac

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass add USE=examples doc

2012-11-27 Thread justin
On 28/11/12 00:06, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 27 November 2012 11:49:52 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 27/11/2012 08:01, justin wrote: The reason I introduced the USE here and in general to use it in similar locations is that those packages install tons of documentation and examples

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-27 Thread justin
On 28/11/12 00:11, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2012 11:47:42 Justin wrote: # Copyright 1999-20012 Gentoo Foundation it is not yet 20012 also, this file too has whitespace damage (indenting with spaces) [[ ${CUDA_VERBOSE} == true ]] NVCCFLAGS+= -v wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass cuda.eclass

2012-11-28 Thread justin
Please review my inclusion of your suggestions. Additionally I move to src_prepare to be more binpackage compatible as things are only of interest at compile time. commit 366a690925f5cc5e4bdd2ea984d9ccca65d8f996 Author: Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org Date: Wed Nov 28 11:54:16 2012 +0100

[gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-28 Thread Justin
-libs/mmdb/mmdb-1.24.ebuild Thanks for comments, Justin # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # @ECLASS: pkgconfig.eclass # @MAINTAINER: # j...@gentoo.org # @BLURB: Simplify creation of pkg-config files # @DESCRIPTION

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-28 Thread justin
On 29/11/12 02:14, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 28 November 2012 16:49:14 Justin wrote: Problem: Some packages aren't lucky and their buildsystem doesn't create pkg-config files out of the box. Solution: Create them by hand. i agree this is a problem. but i think the only real

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread justin
On 29/11/12 09:48, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 08:52 +0100, justin a écrit : Currently we have an eselect module to switch between different implementations by setting /usr/lib/lib[blas,lapack].so to the selected implementation. This has two drawbacks, which some

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread justin
On 29/11/12 09:52, Michał Górny wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:52:01 +0100 justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: The only remaining problem is on the implementation side. As you can imagine, this effort is nothing in which the upstreams are really interested in. Therefore most of our .pc files

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread justin
/lapack are bundled in more then 80% of the packages using it. So we are used to patch them to use system libs. So why not making our lives easier by having a pkg-config option? justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] blas .pc files (was RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass)

2012-11-29 Thread justin
On 29/11/12 16:51, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 29/11/12 09:56 AM, justin wrote: Standard autotools based packages always use --with-blas= so it is pretty simple for us to make it to --with-blas=$(pkg-config --libs blas) same thing goes for cmake and -DBLAS_LIBRARIES=$(pkg-config

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread justin
On 29/11/12 17:23, hasufell wrote: On 11/29/2012 03:56 PM, justin wrote: On 29/11/12 14:16, hasufell wrote: again, even if there are corner cases which cannot be dealt with in a different way... having an eclass function like the mentioned one is bad, cause it suggests that this is a way

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread justin
On 29/11/12 17:54, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 10:07 +0100, justin a écrit : On 29/11/12 09:48, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 08:52 +0100, justin a écrit : Currently we have an eselect module to switch between different implementations

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread justin
On 28/11/12 22:49, Justin wrote: Hi, and another one. Problem: Some packages aren't lucky and their buildsystem doesn't create pkg-config files out of the box. Solution: Create them by hand. Eclass: Simplifies this by providing a general function for that. Example: https

Re: [gentoo-dev] blas .pc files (was RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass)

2012-11-29 Thread Justin
On 29.11.2012 21:11, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:09:34 +0100 justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: On 29/11/12 16:51, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: [...] ..ok remind me again what the .pc files provide you? this is so that you can have slotted blas providers and various packages can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread Justin
thing to standardize. These files should _not_ be distro-dependant. Try to find other solutions. -1 for this eclass Suggestion/question for Justin, Mike (Spanky), and others. Assuming people eventually agree that this is a special case, which I'm beginning to think it might be after

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: sci-libs/blas-atlas sci-libs/lapack-atlas

2012-12-13 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (5 Dec 2012) # sci-libs/(lapack/blas)-altas will be removed due to # fragile build and runtime behaviour #372323. # Alternatives are sci-libs/lapack-reference sci-libs/blas-reference. # Follow up package named sci-libs/atlas can be found in # sci overlay

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: sci-astronomy/sextractor sci-astronomy/scamp

2012-12-13 Thread justin
# Sebastien Fabbro bicat...@gentoo.org (13 Dec 2012) # Necessary removal to get rid of very unstable sci-libs/lapack-atlas # Packages are in the science overlay # until sci-libs/atlas replacement make it to the main tree sci-astronomy/sextractor sci-astronomy/scamp signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread justin
is not a cache? Of course PORTAGE_RO_DISTDIRS and friends are nice here, but they are not part of a default setup. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread justin
On 17/12/12 12:17, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 17/12/2012 12:06, justin wrote: fetch-restricted files are to be considered critical here. Do we want to force the user to keep them twice? So an additional location which is not a cache? Of course PORTAGE_RO_DISTDIRS and friends are nice here

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
are affected (probably through the difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences. My question, did anybody else might have observed similar things? Is there a flaw in this *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff? Thanks, Justin

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
On 09/01/13 10:03, Zac Medico wrote: On 01/09/2013 12:40 AM, justin wrote: My question, did anybody else might have observed similar things? Is there a flaw in this *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff? There could well be, but even in the absence of the *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff, the problem that you're

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences. This looks

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences. This looks

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
On 09/01/13 12:29, justin wrote: On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
On 09/01/13 12:44, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 12:39, justin wrote: I assume it is a portage problem, because the log says autoconf is run but configure.in didn't change. What do you mean configure.in didn't change but autoconf is run? the build.log says Running eautoreconf

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-09 Thread justin
On 09/01/13 13:40, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 13:35, justin wrote: Running autoheader ...[!!] That is unfortunately common... A diff between the original and the two run build's configure.in shows only a difference by one of the two (in both cases the autoheader failed). I

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-10 Thread justin
On 11/01/13 05:10, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 09 January 2013 06:39:37 justin wrote: On 09/01/13 12:29, justin wrote: On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the difference

[gentoo-dev] tcl/tk-8.6 incompatibilities

2013-01-11 Thread justin
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451368 Thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcl/tk-8.6 incompatibilities

2013-01-11 Thread justin
One additional note: application-specific initialization failed: package not known invalid command name auto_mkindex_parser::command This comes from a broken dev-lang/tcl-8.6.0. Revision 1 is fixed. Justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due spock retirement

2013-01-20 Thread justin
On 1/20/13 11:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: dev-python/pycuda Sci is taking this. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] tcltk herd has no active maintainer

2013-02-03 Thread Justin
will join. But please, if someone likes to help, please join. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies

2013-03-14 Thread justin
/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-lisp/clozurecl/Manifest,v -- Manifest new revision: 1.10; previous revision: 1.9 Commit complete. RepoMan sez: If everyone were like you, I'd be out of business! What else should I do? Either use a gpg agent or use a curses based version of pinentry. Justin

[gentoo-dev] kdump

2013-03-27 Thread Justin
Hi all, if someone is interested in implementing any infrastructure for a more advanced usage of kdump for gentoo, please contact me. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] kdump

2013-03-27 Thread Justin
On 27/03/13 12:40, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: if someone is interested in implementing any infrastructure for a more advanced usage of kdump for gentoo, please contact me. I've blogged a bit about this and wrote the wiki page

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-chemistry/talos+

2013-04-09 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (09 Apr 2013) # Fetch fails and mirroring is restricted #465144 =sci-chemistry/talos+-1.2009.1013.14 Please use sci-chemistry/nmrpipe which is in the sci overlay or the webservice at http://spin.niddk.nih.gov/bax/nmrserver/talos/ signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/id3lib: metadata.xml ChangeLog id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild

2013-05-03 Thread Justin
On 03/05/13 19:56, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 03/05/13 20:33, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: jlec13/05/03 17:33:56 Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog Added:id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild Log: media-libs/id3lib: Fix obsolete macros to work with automake-1.13

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-fs/aufs2

2013-05-25 Thread Justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (25 May 2013) # Upstream dropped support long ago # Switch to sys-fs/aufs3 or # sys-kernel/aufs-sources sys-fs/aufs2 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rite: sci-biology/allpaths

2013-07-17 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (17 Jul 2013) # superseeded by sci-biology/allpathslg # Upstream wants anybody to move over sci-biology/allpaths signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC: fortran-2.eclass - Support for bin package system without compiler

2013-07-18 Thread Justin
Hello, I would like to add support for MERGE_TYPE=binary. Therefore I like to deprecate EAPI 4 on long term and use MERGE_TYPE now for EAPIs which support it. Thanks Justin Index: fortran-2.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fortran-2.eclass - Support for bin package system without compiler

2013-07-18 Thread Justin
On 18/07/13 09:12, Michał Górny wrote: + +# @FUNCTION: fortran-2_pkg_setup +# @DESCRIPTION: +# Setup functionallity, +# checks for a valid fortran compiler and optionally for its openmp support. +fortran-2_pkg_setup() { + if [[ ${EAPI:-0} -lt 4 ]]; then Someone else's going to tell you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fortran-2.eclass - Support for bin package system without compiler

2013-07-18 Thread Justin
On 18/07/13 10:25, Duncan wrote: Justin posted on Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:28:49 +0200 as excerpted: + case ${EAPI:-0} in + 0|1|2|3) + eqawarn The fortran-2.eclass is going to deprecate support ^^^ That reads strange to me

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fortran-2.eclass - Support for bin package system without compiler

2013-07-18 Thread Justin
On 18/07/13 17:39, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:44 Thu 18 Jul , Justin wrote: +fortran-2_pkg_setup() { + case ${EAPI:-0} in + 0|1|2|3) + eqawarn Support for EAPI 4 will be removed from the + eqawarn fortran-2.eclass in near future. + eqawarn Please migrate

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2013-07-21 Thread justin
with squashfs images. I normally don't sync more then 20-30% of the image. Justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp.eclass - support for absolute location of rpms

2013-07-22 Thread justin
outside this dir, you need to give the full path. Thanks for comments, Justin --- /local/home/justin/tree/eclass/intel-sdp.eclass 2013-07-19 16:00:50.0 +0200 +++ intel-sdp.eclass2013-07-22 14:02:16.686582103 +0200 @@ -65,11 +65,10 @@ # Possibility to skip the mandatory check

[gentoo-dev] Upgraded Developer Joachim Bartosik (jbartosik)

2013-08-09 Thread Justin
Hi, I would like to announce that Joachim Bartosik (jbartosik) just joined the team as a full dev. He contributed as a staffer before and would like to help now various areas, among others in the gnome project. Please give him again a warm welcome. Justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] Last Rite: sci-libs/mccp4

2013-08-11 Thread Justin
+# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (11 Aug 2013) +# Not needed anymore +# All consumer upstreams moved away from it +sci-libs/mccp4 + signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] SourceForge changed all Git URLs

2009-09-04 Thread Justin
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb: This is a heads-up to all devs who provide/maintain live ebuilds of projects hosted on SourceForge. Live ebuilds won't work anymore. EGIT_REPO_URI has to updated on all ebuilds. Appending /projectname should be enough (for example,

Re: [gentoo-dev] make install without die (gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/hardlink, app-arch/duff )

2009-10-23 Thread Justin
Torsten Veller wrote: * Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) robb...@gentoo.org: 1.1 app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Enable userpriv by default? Support RESTRICT=userpriv? Interaction with prefix in EAPI 3?

2009-12-11 Thread justin
On 11/12/09 21:11, Zac Medico wrote: Should we enable FEATURES=userpriv by default? If we do that then do we also need to support RESTRICT=userpriv? Maybe RESTRICT=userpriv should not be supported on the grounds that it is never justified? What about prefix support (in EAPI 3), which often

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs (almost everything in the livecd herd)

2009-12-31 Thread justin
On 31/12/09 15:55, Andrew Gaffney wrote: app-admin/pwgen - This is used by the LiveCD to generate a random password. It looks like upstream hasn't touched this since it was last bumped in the tree. I would take this one. Jeremy, would you proxy me the next time? signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-13 Thread justin
On 13/01/10 22:02, Ben de Groot wrote: 2010/1/13 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org: On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:35:45 Ben de Groot wrote: 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to put your ebuilds on tree. Have you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages

2010-03-12 Thread justin
On 12/03/10 17:17, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 12-03-2010 08:46:34 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: Proxy-maintainer project

2010-03-18 Thread justin
On 18/03/10 18:24, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: On Thursday 18 March, Markos Chandras wrote: 1) Should we use a new overlay? A new branch on sunrise? or work ebuilds in Gentoo bugzilla?I think the latter is the best 2) I think an email alias is not needed We can monitor maintainer-wanted/-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread justin
here but also in your comments in b.g.o. Cheers, justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel

2010-04-14 Thread Justin
singlular build, atlas libs. They run a benchmark suite to create platform specific headers, which is heavily influenced by the system load. So having RESTRICT=parallel would make the emerge more reliable. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-chemistry/pynmr

2010-04-22 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (22 Apr 2010) # Masked for removal # depends on sci-chemistry/pymol-0.99*, which doesn't work with recent # python, #269119 sci-chemistry/pynmr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites sci-libs/rcsb-data sci-chemistry/maxit sci-chemistry/validation

2010-05-22 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (16 May 2010) # bug 296755 296651 252649 # breaks with newer glibc, gcc and deps # file collision with other packages # no one cares and fixes that # nearly fully replaced by other packages # Last rited today sci-libs/rcsb-data sci-chemistry/validation sci-chemistry

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites sci-libs/rcsb-data sci-chemistry/maxit sci-chemistry/validation

2010-05-25 Thread justin
On 22/05/10 10:40, justin wrote: # Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (16 May 2010) # bug 296755 296651 252649 # breaks with newer glibc, gcc and deps # file collision with other packages # no one cares and fixes that # nearly fully replaced by other packages # Last rited today sci-libs/rcsb

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-libs/ccmath sci-calculators/rpc

2010-06-23 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (16 Jun 10) # Masked for removal in 14 days. # quite old, bug #214548 not worth a fix # superseeded by more functional sci-calculators/orpie dev-libs/ccmath sci-calculators/rpc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrite: app-misc/gato

2010-06-24 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (24 Jun 10) # Masked for removal in 14 days. # quite old, depends on gtk-1 # maintainer-needed # file collisions with sci-misc/gato app-misc/gato signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: sci-visualization/scidavis

2012-01-21 Thread justin
# Justin Lecher j...@gentoo.org (21 Jan 2012) # Mask for removal # Direct upstream is dead, doesn't build anymore # Most code is included in http://labplot.sourceforge.net/ # removal #398897, labplot #399607 sci-visualization/scidavis signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] sci-libs/arpack-3.0.2

2012-01-26 Thread justin
. But they changed the version scheme. We (members of the sci team) agreed to stick to the new versioning so we need a pseudo-downgrade. For your help: echo =sci-libs/arpack-96 /etc/portage/package.mask Thanks for your help, justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/arpack-3.0.2

2012-01-26 Thread justin
On 1/26/12 5:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:23 AM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: We (members of the sci team) agreed to stick to the new versioning so we need a pseudo-downgrade. For your help: echo =sci-libs/arpack-96 /etc/portage/package.mask Wouldn't

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-cealign

2012-02-16 Thread justin
Necessary dep already dropped. Included in all versions of pymol currently in the tree, which is the only consumer Removal in 2 weeks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC patch for subversion.eclass (bug 401737)

2012-02-19 Thread Justin
- } ## -- subversion__get_repository_uri() --- # justin

Re: [gentoo-dev] About gcc-4.6 unmasking

2012-02-20 Thread Justin
for the info Here was the last one http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_b6db68b41a4b318ea2122fb982c10dfb.xml For me it worked fine for months now. justin

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC patch for subversion.eclass (bug 401737)

2012-02-22 Thread Justin
On 22.02.2012 18:33, Matthew Summers wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote: Le dimanche 19 février 2012 à 12:06 +0100, Justin a écrit : Hi, any objections against following patch for subversion.eclass? Fixes bug 401737. Basically respects ESVN_

Re: [gentoo-dev] github g.o.g.o

2012-02-27 Thread justin
On 25/02/12 16:11, Alex Alexander wrote: On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0100, Justin wrote: Hi all, is there a way to do a way or two way sync between a repo on github and on g.o.g.o? I have the felling that I heard of an official overlay which is operated like this. Could someone

[gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Justin
evidence of program bugs to the author. I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in other contexts without permission of the author. /QUOTE The source file do not contain any further license statements. Thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Justin
On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in other contexts without permission of the author. Portage could be considered to be one

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass for Python

2012-03-26 Thread justin
get REQUIRED_USE: USE flag 'python_targets_python3_1' is not in IUSE Did I do something wrong, or is there something not straight in the eclass? Thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass for Python

2012-03-26 Thread justin
On 25/03/12 20:56, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: On 28/02/12 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add this to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of RAM(!!)). Hello, Slightly late due to Real Life™

Re: [gentoo-dev] ESCM_OFFLINE/ EVCS_OFFLINE env variable policy

2012-03-31 Thread Justin
[2048R/5E05C6C2] Hi, I would vote for EVCS_OFFLINE as we already agreed in the dev-vcs discussion on vcs. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About maintaining sci-physics/abinit

2012-04-03 Thread justin
contributions outside the tree. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC: iotop needs to run as root after kernel change

2012-04-04 Thread justin
this be done with portage) Please comment and help me with the right proceeding. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: iotop needs to run as root after kernel change

2012-04-04 Thread justin
On 04/04/12 14:56, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:32:41AM +0200, justin wrote: Hi, after this change https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1a51410abe7d0ee4b1d112780f46df87d3621043 iotop cannot be used as user anymore. Any suggestions how to proceed? The solution I see

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread justin
On 23/05/12 14:42, Michael Weber wrote: Hi, i've looked at the blockers of [TRACKER] portage migration to git [1] and want to discuss testing git-cvsserver [2]. There are two proposed scenarios how to migrate the developers write access to the portage tree. Clean cut turns of cvs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Justin
On 23.05.2012 18:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:42:37PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: i've looked at the blockers of [TRACKER] portage migration to git [1] and want to discuss testing git-cvsserver [2]. There are two proposed scenarios how to migrate the developers write

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-30 Thread Justin
As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for testing. If we go this way, I volunteer. - Aaron As I am a hater of CVS and my current checkout is repeatability spiting weird errors, I would join as a tester here. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Setting F(C)FLAGS=${CFLAGS} in profiles

2012-06-12 Thread Justin
Hi, these days still FFLAGS and FCFLAGS are unset by default. Any objections to to default to CFLAGS of the profile equally to CXXFLAGS? Thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Setting F(C)FLAGS=${CFLAGS} in profiles

2012-06-12 Thread Justin
On 12.06.2012 21:30, Markos Chandras wrote: On 06/12/2012 06:55 PM, Justin wrote: Hi, these days still FFLAGS and FCFLAGS are unset by default. Any objections to to default to CFLAGS of the profile equally to CXXFLAGS? Thanks justin This is the first time I see these variables

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Setting F(C)FLAGS=${CFLAGS} in profiles

2012-06-16 Thread Justin
On 12.06.2012 19:55, Justin wrote: Hi, these days still FFLAGS and FCFLAGS are unset by default. Any objections to to default to CFLAGS of the profile equally to CXXFLAGS? Thanks justin Added. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5

2012-06-16 Thread Justin
them voted by the council? Thanks :) At Fosdem Petteri talked about ideas for next EAPI, which brought up some discussions. Perhaps he or someone else who remembers could summarize the ideas. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix

2012-06-17 Thread Justin
On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote: Hi, During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to Is this really necessary? I never experienced

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix

2012-06-17 Thread Justin
On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote: 2012/6/17 Justin j...@gentoo.org: On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote: Hi, During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix

Re: [gentoo-dev] My wishlist for EAPI 5

2012-06-20 Thread Justin
On 20.06.2012 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400 Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote: Multilib (and/or multiarch) support The current binaries cause a great deal of pain, particularly when a user does not want to upgrade something. I had this problem with

Re: [gentoo-dev] My wishlist for EAPI 5

2012-06-21 Thread justin
On 21/06/12 08:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:43:36 +0200 Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: On 20.06.2012 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400 Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote: Multilib (and/or multiarch) support The current binaries cause

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

2012-06-23 Thread Justin
, but actually I can't judge this, because I am missing a description of what is really going wrong. Don't behave in a way, which you disallow for others. justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

2012-06-23 Thread Justin
On 23.06.2012 18:17, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:13:23 +0200 Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: Did you read what you wrote and thought about what you request from others? Probably you better should. Uh huh, and I think we all know there's a huge difference between knowing

  1   2   3   4   >