[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.3 pre-stabilization

2008-11-01 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi,

Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to
 ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with
 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near
 future if at all possible.  Stabilizing this version is going to be a
 huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to
 implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned up
 in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our sanity
 would be greatly appreciated.

 Is there a bug that is blocked by such stabilisation requests?  We had
such a thing on the GCC 4 transition (apart from the normal porting
tracker) and was really handy.  I will rebuild three x86 systems (one
totally stable, two mostly) to check.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.3 pre-stabilization

2008-11-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:30:09 +0100
Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to
  ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with
  4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near
  future if at all possible.  Stabilizing this version is going to be
  a huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to
  implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned
  up in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our
  sanity would be greatly appreciated.
 
  Is there a bug that is blocked by such stabilisation requests?  We
 had such a thing on the GCC 4 transition (apart from the normal
 porting tracker) and was really handy.  I will rebuild three x86
 systems (one totally stable, two mostly) to check.

There is now:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245160

Thanks for the help. :)

-- 
gcc-porting,  by design, by neglect
treecleaner,  for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.3 pre-stabilization

2008-11-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:30:41 +0100
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ryan Hill wrote:
  In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to
  ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with
  4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near
  future if at all possible.  Stabilizing this version is going to be
  a huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to
  implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned
  up in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our
  sanity would be greatly appreciated.
  
 
 What version is the candidate to reach stable? 4.3.2?

I don't know, that's up to the toolchain guys.  Probably the latest
version available when the tree is ready, which I'm expecting will take
quite some time.


-- 
gcc-porting,  by design, by neglect
treecleaner,  for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature