Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Saturday 05 January 2013 15:29:05 Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Even if you're not a business you should care about maintainable solutions. I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/05/2013 12:47 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Some early work on it using Bootstrap: http://a3li.li/~alex/g.o/ I really like this. The (admittedly kind-of ugly) logo and the flying saucer thing are incorporated tastefully and it makes a big difference. The zebra tables, and especially

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-06 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 1/4/13 9:47 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: I did much of the design work nearly 2 years ago: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dberkholz/gentoo_website/gentoo_landing_black.png http://dev.gentoo.org/~dberkholz/gentoo_website/gentoo_landing_install.png

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-05 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2013.01.05 05:47, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:43 Mon 17 Dec , Markos Chandras wrote: On 16 December 2012 18:53, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: How to do this, however, and what software to target should probably be decided by people who know more than me...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-05 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 5. Januar 2013, 16:46:07 schrieb Roy Bamford: That said, why the hell are we wasting time implementing our own website backend when we should be using a CMS? We're here to make a distro, not a website framework. No reason we should care, day to day, about anything but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-05 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Samstag, 5. Januar 2013, 16:46:07 schrieb Roy Bamford: That said, why the hell are we wasting time implementing our own website backend when we should be using a CMS? We're here to make a distro, not a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-05 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Even if you're not a business you should care about maintainable solutions. I'm sure at the time it was created (12+ years ago) the website

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 18:03 Sat 05 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Samstag, 5. Januar 2013, 16:46:07 schrieb Roy Bamford: I agree its not 'core business' but Gentoo isn't a business. Even if you're not a business you should care about maintainable solutions. More importantly, even if you aren't a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2013-01-04 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:43 Mon 17 Dec , Markos Chandras wrote: On 16 December 2012 18:53, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: How to do this, however, and what software to target should probably be decided by people who know more than me... and in the end it all boils down to who has the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-31 Thread Ben de Groot
On 30 December 2012 00:13, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some Inbound repository until we're full git, which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-31 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 31 of December 2012 16:46:53 Ben de Groot wrote: On 30 December 2012 00:13, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: Can we short cut the whole quiz process

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-29 Thread Ben de Groot
On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some Inbound repository until we're full git, which people can fork/commit/pull and trusted people can review submitted branches and apply them to CVS? This is why I started

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-29 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some Inbound repository until we're full git, which people can fork/commit/pull and trusted people can review

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-29 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: Not to sidetrack the topic farther, but isn't this best done in our github/gentoo account. It is one of the main reasons we have it, to easily accept pull requests from users. It would also make it easier for more devs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-29 Thread Michael Mol
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some Inbound repository until we're full git,

Gentoo and Github (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...) )

2012-12-29 Thread Michael Mol
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: Can we short cut the whole

Re: Gentoo and Github (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...) )

2012-12-29 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
We are. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-29 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 29 of December 2012 11:32:45 Michael Mol wrote: Certainly a sidetrack: I would like to point out that Github now supports Organizations as a semantic concept. I *highly* recommend using something like that over using an 'individual' account as an organization. I've been using

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-28 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 12/26/2012 05:39 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: I know, it should be easy, and I'm probably making excuses, but it boils down to Well, it boils down to you needing an excuse ;) 1. People in Gentoo have asked me to/encouraged me to do the quizzes 2. I've tried several times 3. Still not there.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-27 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: There's no reason we /can't/ have a comparable process for CVS to eliminate needless slopping of files around in pastebins/emails, both of which are time consuming and not designed for doing exactly that. ... (lots of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-26 Thread Kent Fredric
On 19/12/2012 10:03 p.m., Michał Górny wrote: Doesn't this prove that the recruitment process fails to work? If I were to throw random ideas, I'd think about letting new recruits did all commits through a proxy (mentor?). Of course, it all would be easier if we used git. I know this side

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-26 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 05:39:00 +1300 Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 19/12/2012 10:03 p.m., Michał Górny wrote: If I were to throw random ideas, I'd think about letting new recruits did all commits through a proxy (mentor?). Of course, it all would be easier if we used git. For

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-26 Thread Peter Stuge
Jeroen Roovers wrote: For once someone suggests a single good case where git beats CVS for portage tree changes: easily checking suggested changes ... Did you look at Gerrit one of the many times I mentioned it already? That is what it is for, and it is pretty great. A shiny new workflow

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-26 Thread Kent Fredric
On 27 December 2012 13:32, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: What you want to do is contact your mentor - that is the person who should be able to point out where to find the actual answer or just tell you what the answer is - the point of the quizes is to properly teach you how things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:56:56 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:40:06 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: People aren't bothering. It's not because of any fundamental problem -- it's because the process is obscure and potentially a waste of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-19 Thread Markos Chandras
On 19 December 2012 09:03, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Of course, it all would be easier if we used git. Please lets not hijack yet another thread with the git migration. -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-18 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:40:06 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: People aren't bothering. It's not because of any fundamental problem -- it's because the process is obscure and potentially a waste of time. I agree with that. The process takes a lot of time for a minor benefit,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 17 December 2012 00:10, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 12/16/12 14:04, Markos Chandras wrote: On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use some of that bug bounty money to fix up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:10:06 -0500 Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Parts of this docs are outdated but this does not matter. Get involved, fix bugs, help people and someone will ask you to join. Or look for a mentor. If your recruitment process is fix bugs for years and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 16 December 2012 19:14, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: People still think of Gentoo as a ricer distro that's broken all the time, when in reality, it's one of the most stable. Well that's not entirely true but that's a different issue What's not really true? That it's the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 16 December 2012 18:53, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: 1. Even MediaWiki (wiki.gentoo.org) looks better than www.gentoo.org. That's impressive-bad. People still think of Gentoo as a ricer distro that's broken all the time, when in reality, it's one of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 17 December 2012 09:40, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:10:06 -0500 Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Parts of this docs are outdated but this does not matter. Get involved, fix bugs, help people and someone will ask you to join. Or look for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing this. The foundation has the funds to support it, and none of us actually have the time to invest in a complete webpage redesign. If we have funds

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing this. The foundation has the funds to support it, and none of us actually have the time to invest in a complete webpage redesign. Before we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 17 December 2012 12:31, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing this. The foundation has the funds to support it, and none of us actually have the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Markos Chandras
On 17 December 2012 14:08, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing this. The foundation has the funds to support it, and none of us actually have the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2012.12.17 15:15, Markos Chandras wrote: On 17 December 2012 12:31, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Outsource it to someone who has the knowledge and interest in doing this. The foundation has the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:14:49 -0500 Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: I face funroll-loops references and worse almost every time I bring up Gentoo among a different group of Linux-familiar technical people. There are still *very* strong prejudices against Gentoo in most places Comparing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote: Suppose the team in [1] above wrote the specification, who needs to agree it? The council, the trustees, the body of devs ... some combination of that list. All in all, producing an agreed specification for a website

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-17 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote: Suppose the team in [1] above wrote the specification, who needs to agree it? I don't think the whole body of devs has to agree to it. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. It doesn't, and it's not. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/16/2012 12:02 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-12-2012 12:20:10 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Many new developers who want to contribute to to some project will learn git, because a large number of important projects use git. No (new) developers are going to learn CVS. Ever. Therefore, we can rule out using CVS is helping us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 16/12/12 18:57, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. Meh. I actually like CVS and it's very suitable for gentoo-x86 tree. However, if enough people want a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/16/2012 12:23 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 16-12-2012 12:20:10 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Many new developers who want to contribute to to some project will learn git, because a large number of important projects use git. No (new)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Damien Levac
I completely agree, myself, I want to become a developer, but since the information looks so scattered, I decided to wait until summer to have all the required time to find/read all relevant documentation and foillow up with the recruitment process (which seems to be somehow 'non-trivial'). As an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-12-2012 12:40:23 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Actually, I agree with this. But lots of people who are capable of learning CVS just don't want to, since it's (soon to be) a useless skill and perceived as a waste of time. Requiring everyone to do so is a disincentive -- that's all that I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Kacper Kowalik
On 16.12.2012 18:20, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/16/2012 12:02 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. It doesn't,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
1. Even MediaWiki (wiki.gentoo.org) looks better than www.gentoo.org. That's impressive-bad. People still think of Gentoo as a ricer distro that's broken all the time, when in reality, it's one of the most stable. No one would suspect that anything has changed, though,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Markos Chandras
On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use some of that bug bounty money to fix up the recruitment documentation Recruitment documentatiob? What does that mean? People still think of Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Mol
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use some of that bug bounty money to fix up the recruitment documentation

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:43:52 +0100 Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16.12.2012 18:20, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/16/2012 12:02 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michał Górny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:20:10 -0500 Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/16/2012 12:02 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Richard Yao
On 12/16/2012 12:20 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/16/2012 12:02 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 16-12-2012 a las 12:49 -0500, Damien Levac escribió: I completely agree, myself, I want to become a developer, but since the information looks so scattered, I decided to wait until summer to have all the required time to find/read all relevant documentation and foillow up with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Damien Levac
This is funny, because after replying to the list, I actually wrote myself a script to extract that manual from the website into pdf. I should start reading soon... after my other book... xD Damien On 12/16/12 17:34, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 16-12-2012 a las 12:49 -0500, Damien Levac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/16/12 16:32, Michał Górny wrote: Get off powerpoint for your god of choice's sake. Nobody wants to work with that (well, everybody I meet outside actually wants but whatever) :P. Sorry, couldn't resist. I was hoping nobody would call my bluff. This is the only avenue available to me

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/16/12 13:53, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: 1. Even MediaWiki (wiki.gentoo.org) looks better than www.gentoo.org. That's impressive-bad. People still think of Gentoo as a ricer distro that's broken all the time, when in reality, it's one of the most stable. No one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/16/12 14:04, Markos Chandras wrote: On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use some of that bug bounty money to fix up the recruitment documentation Recruitment documentatiob? What does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 12/17/12 08:10, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/16/12 14:04, Markos Chandras wrote: On 16 December 2012 16:57, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: Inspired by the number of packages being unmaintained -- why not use some of that bug bounty money to fix up the recruitment

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 19:10 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/16/12 14:04, Markos Chandras wrote: snip... This guy posted a graph the other day: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org/wp-content/uploads/recruitment_stats.png HA, HA, that's a good one... quote the the above link to the guy