So, :: vs @ apart, is it something that is worth looking and implementing
in future EAPIs?
--
Fabio Erculiani
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 26 May 2009 10:13:51 +0200 (CEST)
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
So, :: vs @ apart, is it something that is worth looking and
implementing in future EAPIs?
Isn't it just a user issue, not one we want used anywhere where EAPI
rules are in effect?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 10:13:51 +0200 (CEST)
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
So, :: vs @ apart, is it something that is worth looking and
implementing in future EAPIs?
Isn't it just a user issue, not one we
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
So, :: vs @ apart, is it something that is worth looking and
implementing in future EAPIs?
I don't see the main tree referring to other repositories any time soon
so this is not a pressing issue. But as said earlier this makes sense
for /etc/portage stuff so
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 20:04 +0200 schrieb lx...@sabayonlinux.org:
And then it's a pm thing. So the person you want to talk about it is
zmedico.
And zmedico told me to start discussing here.
--
Tiziano Müller
On So, 2009-05-24 at 20:04 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
[...]
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports
the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of a
package from a specific repository.
@ is used by Portage for sets. Paludis has
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On So, 2009-05-24 at 20:04 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
[...]
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports
the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of a
package from a
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On So, 2009-05-24 at 20:04 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
[...]
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports
the postfix @repository to let users force the
AllenJB wrote:
As a side note, I think I've read somewhere that it may in the future
be possible to specify sets in package.* (which I assume would be done
using the @set-name syntax), but can't remember where off-hand. This
may have just been a suggestion, but if it ever is implemented, it
On Monday 25 May 2009, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Alex Legler a...@gentoo.org wrote:
On So, 2009-05-24 at 20:04 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
[...]
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client)
supports the postfix @repository
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
Adding @overlay atoms/deps postfix support could really make life
easier, especially because forcing specific atoms in *DEPEND hoping
that these will be always pulled in from the same overlay is not
something reliable, as you already know.
No. This is a terrible
Robert Buchholz wrote:
# emerge --update lsof @system
versus
# emerge --update l...@system
would have completely different meanings. This is what I would dislike
about the '@' character. I'm ok with :: though.
I agree the :: looks like the better option here.
If we use repo_name as
On Monday 25 May 2009, Ben de Groot wrote:
Robert Buchholz wrote:
If we use repo_name as the overlay identifier, we must rethink how
layman-global.txt is currently handled. Many overlays in there have
that file missing, and some have different identifiers than what
layman displays as
On Sun, 24 May 2009 19:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports
the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of a
package from a specific repository.
@ is used by Portage for sets. Paludis has been
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:34 PM, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
Adding @overlay atoms/deps postfix support could really make life
easier, especially because forcing specific atoms in *DEPEND hoping
that these will be always pulled in from the same overlay is not
something reliable, as you
On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:50:45 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Won't this just lead to dependency hell? With horrible dependencies
between different overlays?
It's primarily a user feature. It's not a good way of solving most
inter-repository dependency issues.
--
Ciaran
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:50:45 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Won't this just lead to dependency hell? With horrible dependencies
between different overlays?
It's primarily a user
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:50:45 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Won't this just lead to dependency hell? With horrible dependencies
between different overlays?
It's
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 19:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework client) supports
the postfix @repository to let users force the installation of
Am Sonntag, den 24.05.2009, 20:04 +0200 schrieb lx...@sabayonlinux.org:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 19:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
app-admin/equo (sabayon overlay -- Entropy Framework
20 matches
Mail list logo
