Flammie Pirinen wrote:
2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong.
Not really.
So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to
Aarons's reference. [...] Check
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
possible.
IE5 for mac contains unfixed security issues which won't be
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:14 +, kang wrote:
Now people can also use NCSA Mosaic. It's valid as long as you can run
it. But a browser with vulns, unsupported by the vendor, with a broken
CSS, I think you do not have to support it. Well of course, if you like
it just do it ;)
Hmmm.. I think
On 25-11-2005 12:14:53 +, kang wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
possible.
IE5 for
Patrick Lauer wrote:
Some usability issues:
The top right textlinks are too dark and quite small. They aren't easily
readable and don't present themselves as clickable items (especially
with the dotted line below them they look like random text)
Hm, the don't present themselves as clickable
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +, kang wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
possible.
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +, kang wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:56:14PM +, kang wrote:
Harald van Dijk wrote:
Even with its bugs, it's one of best browsers for MacOS 8.1, which I
still use. But if you can suggest a better one, please do.
You might want to try iCab or opera. Well, I'd suggest you to run linux
on it
On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
The bottom links which are hard to see or notice (cause they're at the
Ingo Bormuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
The bottom links which are
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Like I said before, I rather like the infinity sign. The trustees have had a
discussion on this part too. Their decision was that we need a strong,
compelling case for not using it since it is something the community has
voted on.
I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong. Aaron was gone for months
and months and months so I was listening to the feedback from others and
trying to please everyone. I think I forgot that I took on this project
to implement
2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong.
Not really.
So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to
Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:40, Curtis Napier wrote:
Aarons design uses a smaller default font, that is not acceptable from
an accessibility POV. The main font is at 1em and all cursory fonts
multipliers of 1em. The main font will remain at 1em which is the
standard for the accessibility
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:40, Curtis Napier wrote:
ps. I also found two graphical glitches:
- There is a misterious white bar just below the overview bar (see
ws1.png)
- The corners of the jump pads do not have the proper background color
(see ws2.png)
Fixed. In
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:40:45AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
If there are no more outstanding issues reported I will submit this
current layout for approval.
there's still a ton of wasted space in the purple bar ... if that was
tightened up, more news could be displayed ... having the last
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:40:45AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
If there are no more outstanding issues reported I will submit this
current layout for approval.
the links in the footbars still dont have 'on mouse over' behavior
like all the other links
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 01:40 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
big_snip
Accessibilty guidelines say that all text links should be underlined. I
made an exception for the grey menu bar for aesthetic purposes but will
not make an exception for any other links.
/big_snip
Given the above shouldn't
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of
voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinity was just a
minor detail and not part of the design itself.
Yes, I remember that - I just can't locate it
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:49:47 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of
| voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinity was just a
| minor
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion
will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the
development though...
And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's too
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:23:37AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion
will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the
development though...
22 matches
Mail list logo
