Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-14 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 12/14/2015 04:00 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:20:01 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to >>> repo/gentoo.git! >>> >>> So

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-14 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Why does the official documentation point me at gkeys-gen, which doesn't > work The documentation you linked is a project page for the Gentoo-Keys project. It represents one possible way to accomplish the goal of

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> Since signing is mandatory since the git migration, ahem, this means >> that no one in the last 5 months(!) actually followed the documentation >> (because that does NOT work!). I'm almost impressed, but, wow, this is

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:30:06 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> Since signing is mandatory since the git migration, ahem, this means > >> that no one in the last 5 months(!) actually followed the documentation > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now And a related question: How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way? ... and why is that not default then.

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:38:55 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now > > And a related question: > > How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way? git log --show-signature does this

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to > repo/gentoo.git! > > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now, so let's read the > official documentation. > The [1] wiki seems to be the canonical location for

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 12/13/2015 07:50 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:38:55 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: >> On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> So apparently we're signing things with gpg now >> And a related question: >> >> How would I actually verify the signatures in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:20:01 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to > > repo/gentoo.git! > > > > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-13 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/13/2015 07:00 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > [snip] > > I just wanted to say that I didn't have (too) much trouble setting up my key when I was getting started back in May. I couldn't have done it without your assistance; I believe one other