Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-11 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 12/09/2014 11:21, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11 > Alexis Ballier napisał(a): > >> On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100 >> Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success >>> it will be readded at some point. However, I w

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:21:22 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11 > Alexis Ballier napisał(a): > > > On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a > > > success it will be readded at s

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Alexander Tsoy
В Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:21:22 +0100 Michał Górny пишет: > Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11 > Alexis Ballier napisał(a): > > > On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success > > > it will be readded at so

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 07:27:51 "Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a): > On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> I will also be happy to work on replacing > >>> the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process > >>> against toolchain.eclass if necessary. > >>> > >> Let's get

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11 Alexis Ballier napisał(a): > On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success > > it will be readded at some point. However, I will likely fork glibc > > first and work on a san

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 14:23:21 Tomas Mozes napisał(a): > On 2014-12-07 11:37, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, developers and users. > > > > As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from > > lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely unwilling to > > improve

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Tomas Mozes
On 2014-12-07 11:37, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers and users. As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely unwilling to improve things. I have finally decided to start working on a fork of the sys-devel/gcc e

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > eclasses are pretty great for sharing code akin to a library, but when > *all* of your ebuild's logic is in the eclass, well, that's not really > the intended use case as far as I can tell. It works well in cases like KDE where you have 300 eb

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > 0) This reduces code reusability. The eclass is used by sys-devel/kgcc64 in > the tree and (at least) the hardened-dev::musl overlay outside. Yes, but while your claim that it reduces reusability is true, I think that's potentially a goo

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Forking code does not address the QA issues currently against > toolchain.eclass. The two issues are orthogonal and I don't think I > connected them in my emails. I disagree with forking but have no right to > obstruct it and would not

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 12/08/14 07:32, Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote: I will also be happy to work on replacing the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process against toolchain.eclass if necessary. Let's

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 12/07/14 17:41, William Hubbs wrote: On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:32:57AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote: If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd appreciate any bug report

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote: I will also be happy to work on replacing the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process against toolchain.eclass if necessary. >>> Let's get the list

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote: I will also be happy to work on replacing the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process against toolchain.eclass if necessary. Let's get the list of QA issues so I at least can work towards a toolchain-r1.eclass if you're not inter

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success > it will be readded at some point. However, I will likely fork glibc > first and work on a sane crossdev alternative. Could you please elaborate on this ? How and why t

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-07 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:32:57AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile > wrote: > > On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > >> If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd > >> appreciate any bug reports, except for those co

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd >> appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things i've >> already listed as missing :). Any further comments w

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-07 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-07, o godz. 08:05:59 "Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a): > On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd > > appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things i've > > already listed as missing :). Any furt

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-07 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote: If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things i've already listed as missing :). Any further comments will be very helpful in deciding on the way forward. Removing the ec

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-07 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-07, o godz. 04:43:05 Daniel Campbell napisał(a): > > If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. > > I'd appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things > > i've already listed as missing :). Any further comments will be > > very helpful in decid

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-07 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2014 04:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, developers and users. > > As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from > lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely > unwilling to improve things. I have final