On 12/09/2014 11:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
>> On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>> 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success
>>> it will be readded at some point. However, I w
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:21:22 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a
> > > success it will be readded at s
В Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:21:22 +0100
Michał Górny пишет:
> Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success
> > > it will be readded at so
Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 07:27:51
"Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a):
> On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> I will also be happy to work on replacing
> >>> the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process
> >>> against toolchain.eclass if necessary.
> >>>
> >> Let's get
Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11
Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success
> > it will be readded at some point. However, I will likely fork glibc
> > first and work on a san
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 14:23:21
Tomas Mozes napisał(a):
> On 2014-12-07 11:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, developers and users.
> >
> > As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from
> > lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely unwilling to
> > improve
On 2014-12-07 11:37, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, developers and users.
As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from
lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely unwilling to
improve things. I have finally decided to start working on a fork of
the sys-devel/gcc e
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> eclasses are pretty great for sharing code akin to a library, but when
> *all* of your ebuild's logic is in the eclass, well, that's not really
> the intended use case as far as I can tell.
It works well in cases like KDE where you have 300 eb
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
> 0) This reduces code reusability. The eclass is used by sys-devel/kgcc64 in
> the tree and (at least) the hardened-dev::musl overlay outside.
Yes, but while your claim that it reduces reusability is true, I think
that's potentially a goo
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> Forking code does not address the QA issues currently against
> toolchain.eclass. The two issues are orthogonal and I don't think I
> connected them in my emails. I disagree with forking but have no right to
> obstruct it and would not
On 12/08/14 07:32, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote:
I will also be happy to work on replacing
the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process
against toolchain.eclass if necessary.
Let's
On 12/07/14 17:41, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:32:57AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote:
If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd
appreciate any bug report
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote:
I will also be happy to work on replacing
the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process
against toolchain.eclass if necessary.
>>> Let's get the list
On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote:
I will also be happy to work on replacing
the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process
against toolchain.eclass if necessary.
Let's get the list of QA issues so I at least can work towards a
toolchain-r1.eclass if you're not inter
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success
> it will be readded at some point. However, I will likely fork glibc
> first and work on a sane crossdev alternative.
Could you please elaborate on this ?
How and why t
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:32:57AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
> > On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >> If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd
> >> appreciate any bug reports, except for those co
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
> On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd
>> appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things i've
>> already listed as missing :). Any further comments w
Dnia 2014-12-07, o godz. 08:05:59
"Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a):
> On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd
> > appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things i've
> > already listed as missing :). Any furt
On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote:
If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd
appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things i've
already listed as missing :). Any further comments will be very helpful
in deciding on the way forward.
Removing the ec
Dnia 2014-12-07, o godz. 04:43:05
Daniel Campbell napisał(a):
> > If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy.
> > I'd appreciate any bug reports, except for those covering things
> > i've already listed as missing :). Any further comments will be
> > very helpful in decid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2014 04:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, developers and users.
>
> As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from
> lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely
> unwilling to improve things. I have final
21 matches
Mail list logo
