On Wednesday 25 August 2010 21:38:10 Alex Schuster wrote:
J. Roeleveld writes:
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:32:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU, on-board
Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 4GB of memory, an 1.5 TB drive. Lots of LVM
volumes, all
On Thursday 26 August 2010 01:06:59 Alex Schuster wrote:
J. Roeleveld writes:
Can you post the result of: ps axu?
This will give an indication which processes are running and using a
lot of memory.
The fifth colums gives the memory, right? Should this add up to the total
of the 'used'
On Thursday 26 August 2010 02:11:44 Alex Schuster wrote:
I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source ATI
drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my xorg.conf. And
all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how fast a desktop should
be.
I'm not yet
Update:
I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source ATI
drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my xorg.conf.
And all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how fast a desktop
should be.
I'm not yet sure all is fine. On the first start, kwin
On Thursday 26 August 2010 11:34:23 Alex Schuster wrote:
Update:
I first got no dri with xorg-server 1.8, too, and then weird effects
started happening, like the shift and ctrl keys not working. When tings
crashed, I got a block screen and still could move the mouse, but that was
all, even
Hi there!
YFYI, this list is about to be closed. That's a pity, I'd like to have
such a list, but it is also true that there was nearly no traffic at all -
I count 24 posts this year, all in the same thread except for another
accidental posting. Maybe it was just that too few people knew about
Joost Roeleveld writes:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 02:11:44 Alex Schuster wrote:
I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source
ATI drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my
xorg.conf. And all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how
fast a
On Thursday 26 August 2010 15:05:26 Alex Schuster wrote:
Hi there!
YFYI, this list is about to be closed. That's a pity, I'd like to have
such a list, but it is also true that there was nearly no traffic at all -
I count 24 posts this year, all in the same thread except for another
:)
At least I will have the eternal high-score according to
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-performance-per-year.xml .
Not couting those empty cheating messages from imail...@capstonecomm.com.
Wonko, winner of gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Joost Roeleveld writes:
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 21:38:10 Alex Schuster wrote:
And I just moved my PORTAGE_TMPDIR to an unencrypted partition.
Can LVM create noticeable overhead? I also resized my logical volumes
a couple of times, could this lead to some LVM fragmentation?
On Thursday 26 August 2010 17:48:44 Alex Schuster wrote:
Joost Roeleveld writes:
LVM-fragmentation is a definite possibility.
To defragment it, have a look at the following:
http://bisqwit.iki.fi/source/lvm2defrag.html
Cool!
Do test it first and check what it wants to do.
Basically,
from me, goodbye to this list, it was nice while it lasted :)
At least I will have the eternal high-score according to
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-performance-per-year.xml .
Not couting those empty cheating messages from imail...@capstonecomm.com.
Yes, with me in second place
Hi Alex,
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:32:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
Me again.
I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU, on-board Radeon HD
3200 graphics, 4GB of memory, an 1.5 TB drive. Lots of LVM volumes, all
encrypted, except for /usr/src and portage stuff. The system is
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Now I am out of ideas. I really hope someone here has one. I cannot work
with this system any more when emerges are going on.
I put my kernel config, make.conf, dmesg and such stuff to
http://www.wonkology.org/gentoo/
Dnia 2010-08-25, o godz. 03:32:40
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org napisał(a):
Me again.
I wrote here about my problems with mplayer stuttering during
emerges. Then I wrote that the problem went away when I installed
Gentoo again, moving from i686 to x86_64. But the problems are back,
and
Mansour Moufid writes:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org
wrote:
Just a thought: why -ggdb in your CFLAGS? If you have =gcc-4.2, try:
CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe
I just added this some days ago in order to give debug information for a a
bug in strigi I
Kacper Kopczyński writes:
Checkout configuration of your video driver - X should not take more
than 5% of cpu when iddle (with some minor effects). Perhaps kde is not
using OpenGL? Do you have OpenGL enabled?
I'm using ati-drivers-10.7 with xorg-server-1.7.7-r1. No special settings
in
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
I just added this some days ago in order to give debug information for a a
bug in strigi I had reported. I forgot to take it out, but so far only few
packages were compiled with this setting. But thanks for mentioning
J. Roeleveld writes:
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:32:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU, on-board
Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 4GB of memory, an 1.5 TB drive. Lots of LVM
volumes, all encrypted, except for /usr/src and portage stuff. The
system
Mansour Moufid writes:
But actually it sounds like you don't have direct rendering? Check
with glxinfo (from x11-apps/mesa-progs):
$ glxinfo | grep -i direct
Thanks, but opengl is running fine. Well, it took me quite a while until I
got it working, but finally there was a version of
I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source ATI
drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my xorg.conf. And
all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how fast a desktop should
be.
I'm not yet sure all is fine. On the first start, kwin crashed and all
Me again.
I wrote here about my problems with mplayer stuttering during emerges.
Then I wrote that the problem went away when I installed Gentoo again,
moving from i686 to x86_64. But the problems are back, and worse than
ever. This is driving me crazy. CRAZY!
I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual
Oh, well. It's been quite a while. I wanted to reply earlier, but then
kmail crashed and I lost the mail. ThenI was quite busy with other things,
and so on.
Mansour Moufid wrote:
Hello all,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org
wrote:
I am a little
subject
Nicholas J. Michalek writes:
Roll-call thread! I'm here!
Cool. Hi Nicholas! Hi Fritze!
Indeed, this list has tended to have periods of dormancy... like me, we
probably all forgot about it until this recent resurrection.
My post took awhile until it showed up, so had already filed a bug
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:56:31 -0500
Nicholas J. Michalek djpha...@gmail.com wrote:
anything anyone is interested in.
Anyone use Xen?
I'd appreciate anything that helped performance
there (about to dive in myself).
enjoi
--
Steven Lembark 85-09 90th
Hello all,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
I am a little disappointed by the performance of my system. mplayer
sometimes stutters a little during the calculation phase of emerge -DpN
@world, swfdec-player does so even more. Well, sometimes even without
Hi there!
Well... is there anybody out there? According to
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.performance , the last post is
half a year ago. Does this mean performance is already okay for everyone?
Or does no one bother to post here, because the audience seems to be low,
and uses the
Hey Alex,
I'm here, and I don't really believe that performance isn't the kind of
thing
that people should consider okay. It's good to push limits. :)
Nice to meet you,
--Fritze
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Hi there!
Well... is there anybody
unsubscribe
Hi list!
Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance
implications?
To be more specific:
I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network services
and the company I work for uses some of their (Intranet web and
file) servers for high performance computing.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:53:36 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance
implications?
To be more specific:
I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network
services and the company I work for
+8J8sUWWsH1tbUKtTV2zJeqtxqQCfbmsh
61CH7oj43zsBSceBu+ZCTo4=
=5ARe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
We could make a running gag from it.. :)
Jan
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
about gagging to gentoo-kink.
--
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of human rights?
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
--Ghost in the Shell
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp/option008.htm
http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5NP0C153PI.html
kind regards!
--
Miguel Sousa Filipe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
-the-less, and when you have a DBA crying about poor network speed or
IO, or the system is too heavily loaded, then this keeps him quiet for a few
days. :)
Any thoughts???
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
Miguel Sousa Filipe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp/option008.htm
http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5NP0C153PI.html
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200
Dirk Wende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*sigh*
How many people have to try it before the last one _finally_ recognizes
that it doesn't work that way?
In other words: RTFM
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
unsubscribing, I'd like to mention that most of them
just opened their email and saw a couple hundred emails with a subject
of [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!. I doubt
they saw any of the unsubscribe attempts since most were replies and
would not be shown in most
how do i unsubscribe from this?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
From: Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED].net
Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200
Dirk Wende dwende@versanet.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do i unsubscribe from this?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
From: Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].net
Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm
To: gentoo-performance
2008/6/6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
how do i unsubscribe from this?
As Florian pointed out:
In other words: RTFM
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
Alex
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
what's wrong with the mailing system, it looks like in a loop of the
mailling program. is it been hacked?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian Philipp schrieb:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 04:40:33 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (List Server) wrote:
Am I the only one
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:54 AM, List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
:
Am I the only one who gets a lot of these messages today?
me too
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
* List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
hmm, maybe some accidently redirected the list to the listbot ?
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
