nds to get
> > too busy at times.
> >
> > Also from me, goodbye to this list, it was nice while it lasted :)
>
> At least I will have the eternal high-score according to
> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-performance-per-year.xml .
> Not couting those empty chea
On Thursday 26 August 2010 17:48:44 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Joost Roeleveld writes:
> > LVM-fragmentation is a definite possibility.
> > To defragment it, have a look at the following:
> >
> > http://bisqwit.iki.fi/source/lvm2defrag.html
>
> Cool!
Do test it first and check what it wants to do.
B
Joost Roeleveld writes:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2010 21:38:10 Alex Schuster wrote:
> > And I just moved my PORTAGE_TMPDIR to an unencrypted partition.
> > Can LVM create noticeable overhead? I also resized my logical volumes
> > a couple of times, could this lead to some LVM fragmentation?
>
>
t was nice while it lasted :)
At least I will have the eternal high-score according to
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-performance-per-year.xml .
Not couting those empty cheating messages from imail...@capstonecomm.com.
Wonko, winner of gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
On Thursday 26 August 2010 15:05:26 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> YFYI, this list is about to be closed. That's a pity, I'd like to have
> such a list, but it is also true that there was nearly no traffic at all -
> I count 24 posts this year, all in the same thread except for another
> acc
Joost Roeleveld writes:
> On Thursday 26 August 2010 02:11:44 Alex Schuster wrote:
> > I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source
> > ATI drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my
> > xorg.conf. And all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how
> > fa
Hi there!
YFYI, this list is about to be closed. That's a pity, I'd like to have
such a list, but it is also true that there was nearly no traffic at all -
I count 24 posts this year, all in the same thread except for another
accidental posting. Maybe it was just that too few people knew about
On Thursday 26 August 2010 11:34:23 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Update:
> I first got no dri with xorg-server 1.8, too, and then weird effects
> started happening, like the shift and ctrl keys not working. When tings
> crashed, I got a block screen and still could move the mouse, but that was
> all, ev
Update:
> I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source ATI
> drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my xorg.conf.
> And all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how fast a desktop
> should be.
>
> I'm not yet sure all is fine. On the first start, kwin
On Thursday 26 August 2010 02:11:44 Alex Schuster wrote:
> I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source ATI
> drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my xorg.conf. And
> all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how fast a desktop should
> be.
>
> I'm no
On Thursday 26 August 2010 01:06:59 Alex Schuster wrote:
> J. Roeleveld writes:
> > Can you post the result of: "ps axu"?
> > This will give an indication which processes are running and using a
> > lot of memory.
>
> The fifth colums gives the memory, right? Should this add up to the total
> of t
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 21:38:10 Alex Schuster wrote:
> J. Roeleveld writes:
> > On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:32:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
> > > I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU, on-board
> > > Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 4GB of memory, an 1.5 TB drive. Lots of LVM
> > > volu
I think I just found the problem! I decided to give the open source ATI
drivers a try again, and replaced 'fglrx' by 'radeon' in my xorg.conf. And
all is fast now. Wow. I had already forgotten how fast a desktop should
be.
I'm not yet sure all is fine. On the first start, kwin crashed and all
J. Roeleveld writes:
> Can you post the result of: "ps axu"?
> This will give an indication which processes are running and using a
> lot of memory.
The fifth colums gives the memory, right? Should this add up to the total
of the 'used' column in free -m?
Because it does not:
wo...@weird ~ $ f
Mansour Moufid writes:
> But actually it sounds like you don't have direct rendering? Check
> with glxinfo (from x11-apps/mesa-progs):
>
> $ glxinfo | grep -i direct
Thanks, but opengl is running fine. Well, it took me quite a while until I
got it working, but finally there was a version of ati
J. Roeleveld writes:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:32:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
> > I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU, on-board
> > Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 4GB of memory, an 1.5 TB drive. Lots of LVM
> > volumes, all encrypted, except for /usr/src and portage stuff. The
> >
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> I just added this some days ago in order to give debug information for a a
> bug in strigi I had reported. I forgot to take it out, but so far only few
> packages were compiled with this setting. But thanks for mentioning this,
> I removed th
Kacper Kopczyński writes:
> Checkout configuration of your video driver - X should not take more
> than 5% of cpu when iddle (with some minor effects). Perhaps kde is not
> using OpenGL? Do you have OpenGL enabled?
I'm using ati-drivers-10.7 with xorg-server-1.7.7-r1. No special settings
in xorg
Mansour Moufid writes:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Alex Schuster
> wrote:
> Just a thought: why -ggdb in your CFLAGS? If you have >=gcc-4.2, try:
>
> CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
I just added this some days ago in order to give debug information for a a
bug in strigi I had reporte
Dnia 2010-08-25, o godz. 03:32:40
Alex Schuster napisał(a):
> Me again.
>
> I wrote here about my problems with mplayer stuttering during
> emerges. Then I wrote that the problem went away when I installed
> Gentoo again, moving from i686 to x86_64. But the problems are back,
> and worse than ev
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Now I am out of ideas. I really hope someone here has one. I cannot work
> with this system any more when emerges are going on.
>
> I put my kernel config, make.conf, dmesg and such stuff to
> http://www.wonkology.org/gentoo/ in case someone
Hi Alex,
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 03:32:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Me again.
>
> I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e CPU, on-board Radeon HD
> 3200 graphics, 4GB of memory, an 1.5 TB drive. Lots of LVM volumes, all
> encrypted, except for /usr/src and portage stuff. The system is
Me again.
I wrote here about my problems with mplayer stuttering during emerges.
Then I wrote that the problem went away when I installed Gentoo again,
moving from i686 to x86_64. But the problems are back, and worse than
ever. This is driving me crazy. CRAZY!
I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Cor
Oh, well. It's been quite a while. I wanted to reply earlier, but then
kmail crashed and I lost the mail. ThenI was quite busy with other things,
and so on.
Mansour Moufid wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Alex Schuster
> wrote:
> > I am a little disappointed by the per
subject
Hello all,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> I am a little disappointed by the performance of my system. mplayer
> sometimes stutters a little during the calculation phase of emerge -DpN
> @world, swfdec-player does so even more. Well, sometimes even without
> emerges, I gue
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:56:31 -0500
"Nicholas J. Michalek" wrote:
> anything anyone is interested in.
Anyone use Xen?
I'd appreciate anything that helped performance
there (about to dive in myself).
enjoi
--
Steven Lembark 85-09 90th St.
Workhorse Com
Nicholas J. Michalek writes:
> Roll-call thread! I'm here!
Cool. Hi Nicholas! Hi Fritze!
> Indeed, this list has tended to have periods of dormancy... like me, we
> probably all forgot about it until this recent resurrection.
My post took awhile until it showed up, so had already filed a bug re
Roll-call thread! I'm here!
Indeed, this list has tended to have periods of dormancy... like me, we
probably all forgot about it until this recent resurrection.
Rather than let it die again, I say we throw out ideas for discussion. I
think we should have regular posts commenting on performance im
Hey Alex,
I'm here, and I don't really believe that performance isn't the kind of
thing
that people should consider okay. It's good to push limits. :)
Nice to meet you,
--Fritze
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Well... is there anybody out there? Accordin
Hi there!
Well... is there anybody out there? According to
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.performance , the last post is
half a year ago. Does this mean performance is already okay for everyone?
Or does no one bother to post here, because the audience seems to be low,
and uses the ge
unsubscribe
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:53:36 +0200
Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance
> implications?
>
> To be more specific:
>
> I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network
> services and the company
Hi list!
Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance
implications?
To be more specific:
I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network services
and the company I work for uses some of their (Intranet web and
file) servers for high performance computing. Wou
take off running...
Hey, hey, hey... Take all that talk about gagging to gentoo-kink.
--
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"?
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
--Ghost in the Shell
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Jan Hübner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could make a running gag from it.. :)
>
> Jan
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
OR, we could gag and run away from it...
OR, we could gag you and make you ta
We could make a running gag from it.. :)
Jan
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
jcEwiVM6CtDHQ0RAhRFAJ4+8J8sUWWsH1tbUKtTV2zJeqtxqQCfbmsh
61CH7oj43zsBSceBu+ZCTo4=
=5ARe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp/option008.htm
http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5NP0C153PI.html
kind regards!
sorry if I seemed rude. heh, text can come across like that sometimes.
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
workload there might be better
algorithms)
> try doing
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
>
> http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp/option008.htm
> http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5NP0C153PI.html
kind regards!
--
Miguel Sousa Filipe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
any sense...
>>
> Your right and I'm wrong.
> Its not in the header, its thrown on at the end
> try doing
> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
>
> http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp/option008.htm
> http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5NP0C153PI.html
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
change?
-Original Message-
From: Matej Tyc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:46 PM
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
I can say that this little incident seems to have resurrected the list.
We should be really
t; Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
> From: Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm
> To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
>
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200
>
pwned
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
From: PaulNM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 3:26 pm
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
eric@kelsoes.com wrote:
> how do i unsubscribe from this?
>
> O
2008/6/6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> how do i unsubscribe from this?
As Florian pointed out:
In other words: RTFM
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
Alex
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do i unsubscribe from this?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
From: Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.net>
Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm
To: gentoo
how do i unsubscribe from this?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] unsubscribe
From: Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED].net>
Date: Fri, June 06, 2008 2:30 pm
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200
Dirk Wende &
be fair to those unsubscribing, I'd like to mention that most of them
just opened their email and saw a couple hundred emails with a subject
of "[gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!". I doubt
they saw any of the unsubscribe attempts since most were replies and
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0200
Dirk Wende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
*sigh*
How many people have to try it before the last one _finally_ recognizes
that it doesn't work that way?
In other words: RTFM
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
amps
http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp/option008.htm
http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5NP0C153PI.html
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
is might be a slight increase, but its an increase
> none-the-less, and when you have a DBA crying about poor network speed or
> IO, or the system is too heavily loaded, then this keeps him quiet for a few
> days. :)
> Any thoughts???
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing
targeted system.
Like I said this might be a slight increase, but its an increase
none-the-less, and when you have a DBA crying about poor network speed
or IO, or the system is too heavily loaded, then this keeps him quiet
for a few days. :)
Any thoughts???
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
completely forgot about this list. Performance is pretty much a
dead list, although I think its average monthly volume just went up a
bit. :)
I don't even have a filter for gentoo-performance, even though all my
other subscribed gentoo mailing lists go to this address. It simply
doesn&#
you. I don't use Gentoo anymore and don't really care to search it's
> docs for how to do this. I hope you all are able to resolve this soon.
Great attitude. I hope you... sell... I'll send some bad Karma your way...
--
From the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
2008/6/5 Dusan Mulac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> why are they even still unsubscribing? didnt those "mail-bombs" stop coming?
> or is it just my spam filter filtering duplicate messages?
I put a stop to them earlier after someone notified Infrastructure.
--
gentoo-performance@li
cribe. Is this an accurate
representation of all the users of this mailing list? :P
They can't read because they're going to _fast_!!!
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
x27;s docs for how to do this. I hope you all are able to resolve this
soon.
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Follow the instructions on the mailing list page.
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
Ethan Boyle wrote:
I tried to unsubscribe a couple of times but I still keep getting mail.
How do I unsubscribe?
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
2008/6/5 Ethan Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I tried to unsubscribe a couple of times but I still keep getting mail. How
> do I unsubscribe?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Alex Howells wrote:
I do have to wonder why all the ricers on -performance can't RTFM to
the point they can even unsubscribe. Is this an accurate
representation of all the users of this mailing list? :P
They can't read because they're going to _fast_!!!
--
gentoo-performance@l
I tried to unsubscribe a couple of times but I still keep getting mail.
How do I unsubscribe?
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I do have to wonder why all the ricers on -performance can't RTFM to
the point they can even unsubscribe. Is this an accurate
representation of all the users of this mailing list? :P
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
tire list got it???
> > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: "Zhicheng Wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:15:55
> > To:gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org<[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thursday 05 June 2008 08:42:19 am Daniel Svensson wrote:
> unsubscribe
NO!
--
From the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
TECTED]>
>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:15:55
> To:gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!
>
>
> me too.
>
> 2008/6/5, Kyle Lutze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Justin wrote:
>>> Florian Phili
I got it too! You think the entire list got it???
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: "Zhicheng Wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:15:55
To:gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Serv
t of these messages today?
>>>
>> me too
>>
> I've been getting one a minute, up to 160 or so so far.
>
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
www.mygin.cn
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Justin wrote:
Florian Philipp schrieb:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 04:40:33 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (List Server) wrote:
Am I the only one who gets a lot of these messages today?
me too
I've been getting one a minute, up to 160 or so so far.
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:00 PM,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
> Topics (messages 248 through 297):
>
> [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!
> 248 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (List Server)
> 249 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (List
* Ray Quezada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Grmpf. Please don't send robot requests to the list address.
This just makes more noise and most likely won't be ca
unsubscribe
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:13:11 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!
>
> unsubscribe
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:54 AM, List Server &
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
* List Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
hmm, maybe some accidently redirected the list to the listbot ?
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT se
(List Server) wrote:
Am I the only one who gets a lot of these messages today?
me too
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:54 AM, List Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
