On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 04:15 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> I also don't like your tone in your response to Zac merging the patch.
>
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage-dev/message/1abfd0499e514b7d6b70b709e9e3ae18
>
> If I say out here that since I'm a council member I'm above you and zac
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 10:37:29PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> That is a really poor argument. Something that's respected for 10+
> years and reported as QA violation is a standing policy as far as I'm
> concerned. Just because it isn't backed by a formally stamped policy
> (at least as far as
On 03/11/19 21:37, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 15:26 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> You being a qa member doesn't have a lot to do with this mgorny. you
>> know there was no official policy when I posted this, and as far as I
>> know there is not one now.
>>
> That is a really
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 15:26 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 12:18:40PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 11/3/19 11:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 11:49 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > > On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > > Most upstreams
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 12:18:40PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 11/3/19 11:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 11:49 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> >>> causes
On 11/3/19 12:32 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
>> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
>> ---
>> bin/install-qa-check.d/80libraries | 10 --
>>
On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
> ---
> bin/install-qa-check.d/80libraries | 10 --
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On 11/3/19 11:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 11:49 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
>>> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 11:49 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> > causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
> > ---
> >
On 10/27/19 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
> ---
> bin/install-qa-check.d/80libraries | 10 --
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:40:07PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
I spoke with the qa lead about this as you suggested, and he doesn't
feel that he needs to ack this from a qa standpoint.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 1:58 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> And why are you trying to sneak it past most of the developers via
> gentoo-portage-dev instead of gentoo-dev?
Sending mail to this list is standard-procedure when submitting a
patch against the Portage repo. If you feel it needs wider
On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 13:49 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 06:58:00PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> > > causes unnecessary hacks in
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 06:58:00PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> > causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
> >
>
> The hacks aren't 'unnecessary'. There is a very
On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
>
The hacks aren't 'unnecessary'. There is a very good reason that files
that are used *purely at build time* don't land in /.
Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this
causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds.
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
---
bin/install-qa-check.d/80libraries | 10 --
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/install-qa-check.d/80libraries
16 matches
Mail list logo
