Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:15:19PM -0800, Brian wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-03 at 17:39 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: emerge bzr bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour cd saviour bzr pull ...roughly. ;) a little too rough :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Try again :) ~harring pgpJVERABoPLh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)
Hi, Brian wrote on Thursday the 2nd of March 2006: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour bzr: ERROR: urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden at /usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py line 480 in http_error_default [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ After getting 156 items in saviour/.bzr/revision-store (219 items in weaves) I'm getting exactly the same error after a few minutes and 285 of 384 packages. Bye, Michael -- Michael Schilling eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://glcu.sf.net/ IRC : Zerwas on #sfg(IRCnet) and #gentoo.de(freenode) Change my name I remain the same. - Moloko -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:54:45PM +0100, Michael Schilling wrote: Hi, Brian wrote on Thursday the 2nd of March 2006: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bzr get http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour bzr: ERROR: urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden at /usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py line 480 in http_error_default [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ After getting 156 items in saviour/.bzr/revision-store (219 items in weaves) I'm getting exactly the same error after a few minutes and 285 of 384 packages. See... I always have a helluva time transitioning the repository since I keep forgetting simple things like upload the repo, not an export or reset perms due to umask... Either way, bzr repo should be fine, and a tarball is up there (might be quickest grabbing that and just doing a pull afterwards) ~harring pgpmkLn1TQrvP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)
Brian Harring wrote: I switched over to bzr about 2 months back; svn doesn't allow for offline committing, nor does gentoo's vcs allow for anon*... bzr natively allows for those capabilities, so that's what I'm using. :) http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour Is where I'll be updating the code for at least the near future. Oh c'mon, be trendy and use git. bzr is so last year. Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)
Marius Mauch wrote: Does that mean we should drop the SVN branch? Marius I've already removed it from the documentation and added links to Brian's current work on ge.org. As far as the actual repo, I think keeping it around a bit longer might be beneficial, but who knows. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions regarding the new portage API (savior branch)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:44:58PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: Brian Harring wrote: On 2/28/06, *Michael Schilling* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Is one of these svn-web-repository up to date? * http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/branches/savior/ * http://mzz.mine.nu/bzr/savior-svn/portage/ http://mzz.mine.nu/bzr/savior-svn/portage/ I switched over to bzr about 2 months back; svn doesn't allow for offline committing, nor does gentoo's vcs allow for anon*... bzr natively allows for those capabilities, so that's what I'm using. :) http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour Is where I'll be updating the code for at least the near future. Does that mean we should drop the SVN branch? Realistically... I have no intention of going back to SVN, haven't for a while. Can't even access the darn thing now a days anyways, thus the branch has fallen further in usefulness to me :) If y'all want to mirror it, might I suggest poking marienz for his tailorization knowledge? Afaik, he had a bzr-svn push working, or at least has investigated it. ~harring pgpp4WaacDO2M.pgp Description: PGP signature
