Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Nagatoro wrote:
>> Brian Harring wrote:
>>> Specific merge list would be wonderful... ;)
>> Just had one fail on me: media-libs/libsndfile-1.0.12-r1
>> It hung right after configure.
>
> Specifics...
>
> Hanging isn't much detail he
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:40:09AM +0100, Nagatoro wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Nagatoro wrote:
> >> Brian Harring wrote:
> >>> Specific merge list would be wonderful... ;)
> >> Just had one fail on me: media-libs/libsndfile-1.0.12-r1
> >> It hung righ
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:56:06PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
> agree here. i would go as far as to maybe print a message to that effect
> if the build fails while FEATURES="confcache".
EBUILD_DEATH_HOOKS comes to mind :)
>
> >Meanwhile, if you're getting failures up the ying yang and it's not
> >tr
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Nagatoro wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:06:24PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
> >> Well, i've been testing this on an x86 laptop and an x86_64 box over the
> >> weekend. Good news is that when it works, it works well. Bad news is
>
Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:06:24PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
Well, i've been testing this on an x86 laptop and an x86_64 box over the
weekend. Good news is that when it works, it works well. Bad news is I've
yet to be able to get through an 'emerge -e world' without at least a
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 12:25 +0100, Nagatoro wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:06:24PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
> >> Well, i've been testing this on an x86 laptop and an x86_64 box over the
> >> weekend. Good news is that when it works, it works well. Bad news is
> >> I've
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:06:24PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
>> Well, i've been testing this on an x86 laptop and an x86_64 box over the
>> weekend. Good news is that when it works, it works well. Bad news is I've
>> yet to be able to get through an 'emerge -e world' without a
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:06:24PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
> (sorry if this double posts)
>
> Brian Harring wrote:
> >Yo...
> >
> >attached is a patch enabling confcache support for portage. Lots of
> >testing, plus fixups from comments from folks prior.
> >
> >So... giving it a few days, nows the
(sorry if this double posts)
Brian Harring wrote:
Yo...
attached is a patch enabling confcache support for portage. Lots of
testing, plus fixups from comments from folks prior.
So... giving it a few days, nows the time to bitch if you dislike the
implementation (and no, I'm not rewriting a
