Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-08 Thread Spider
begin quote On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:34:12 +0200 (CEST) Joel Palmius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a note of interest here: I don't think this is gentoo-specific > problem. I had exactly the same problem with two different versions of > Mandrake too. > > Amusingly enough I never had the problem

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-04 Thread jenora
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:42:59AM +0200, Joel Palmius wrote: > Although, what to do when it seems it is the system *software* that seems > to mess up time and there seems to be no explanation as to why? > > These are the explanations I've heard so far for the lagging time > behavior: > > [...]

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-04 Thread Juri Haberland
William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is more than one cause. Check the forums, its full of this > issue. The definite cause for me on a celery dell laptop was the gnome > battery applet. It has a known bug (fixed???) where it stalls the > machine whilst reading /proc under apm. >

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-04 Thread William Kenworthy
There is more than one cause. Check the forums, its full of this issue. The definite cause for me on a celery dell laptop was the gnome battery applet. It has a known bug (fixed???) where it stalls the machine whilst reading /proc under apm. On a later machine with a much faster p4, you can som

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-04 Thread Joel Palmius
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Robert Bragg wrote: > My point was (I still think this is correct) that if his setup is > resulting in his clock getting out of sync on a daily basis, by 20-30 > minutes then he has bigger problems to think about before he starts > playing with ntpd. True, true.. I stopped us

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Robert Bragg
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:20:32PM +, Juri Haberland wrote: > Robert Bragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think ntp is the wrong tool for the job here. ntp isn't for keeping you > > clock about right, its for when you want yor clock to be extremly acurate. > > > Just saying, 'coz ntpd seems

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Juri Haberland
Juri Haberland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whoops, lots of spelling mistakes. Sorry for that. Cheers, Juri -- Juri Haberland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Juri Haberland
Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/7/03 6:28 pm, "Christopher Egner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Alright then, any ideas what to use. I mean, I agree syncing to multiple >> servers seems a bit drastic (nice to know I won't be late for work, but >> still...). ... It's not drastic. It's

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Tim Ryan
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 17:23, Stroller wrote: > On 3/7/03 6:28 pm, "Christopher Egner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alright then, any ideas what to use. I mean, I agree syncing to multiple > > servers seems a bit drastic (nice to know I won't be late for work, but > > still...). ... > > > > If

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Juri Haberland
Robert Bragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think ntp is the wrong tool for the job here. ntp isn't for keeping you > clock about right, its for when you want yor clock to be extremly acurate. > Just saying, 'coz ntpd seems to be a slightly missused tool. Nope, ntp is *exactly* for keeping your

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Stroller
On 3/7/03 6:28 pm, "Christopher Egner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alright then, any ideas what to use. I mean, I agree syncing to multiple > servers seems a bit drastic (nice to know I won't be late for work, but > still...). ... > > If anyone has any other ideas. let me know rdate was mention

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Joel Palmius
As a note of interest here: I don't think this is gentoo-specific problem. I had exactly the same problem with two different versions of Mandrake too. Amusingly enough I never had the problem with older versions of Mandrake, so something must've changed during the last 18 months or so. (this

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Christopher Egner
Alright then, any ideas what to use. I mean, I agree syncing to multiple servers seems a bit drastic (nice to know I won't be late for work, but still...). Shoot even syncing to one! I saw the perl script, and I'll give that a go, but there's gotta be a better way. I mean for the system to be off t

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Robert Bragg
I think ntp is the wrong tool for the job here. ntp isn't for keeping you clock about right, its for when you want yor clock to be extremly acurate. You should have a working clock to startwith (i.e. no harware errors or miss-configurations) Unless you force it to (-g I think), ntpd will usually

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-03 Thread Joel Palmius
I have this problem too, but noticed that there's a difference between system time (as measured by "date") and hardware time (as measured by "hwclock"). Since the hardware clock seemed to keep up, while the system time sometimes lagged as much as 25% compared to real time, my solution was to ma

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-02 Thread Christopher Egner
Nevermind. Stupid me didn't set the timezone in KDE to view! Well now I'm gonna go kick myself. Night -- Christopher In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 95. Something must have gone

[gentoo-user] OT: ntp

2003-07-02 Thread Christopher Egner
Alright, perhaps I'm a bit lost on this. My clock always runs off about 20 to 30 minutes after a day or so. Only in linux though. I figured I'd start using ntpd. However, I can't seem to figure out how to configure a timezone for it. Any help here would be great. -- Christopher In 1968 it took th