Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
The Gentoo docs say gs-sources are more stable and reliable then
gentoo-sources but gentoo-sources have better performance. How much
more stable are the gs vs gentoo-sources? For those who have used both
- what is the difference in performance and stability,
I would use vanilla with ck patches for a desktop system, it has got all the
cool preempt low latency O1 seduler stuff in :-)
- Original Message -
From: Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 1:33 AM
Subject: [gentoo-user]
: 2003/12/31 Wed AM 05:29:47 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources vs GS-sources
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
The Gentoo docs say gs-sources are more stable and reliable then
gentoo-sources but gentoo-sources have better First of all, why ask the same
question
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:33, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
The Gentoo Kernel Guide says gs is supposed to be more stable then
gentoo-sources. How much more stable and reliable is the question or
conversely, how much difference is there in performance. I'm running a
desktop system used for
