At Fri, 25 May 2007 07:28:31 +0200 Roman Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Briggs wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86.
I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64.
Not all Core 2
Duo's in
Due to issues with some of the software I am wanting to run, when it is
run under the AMD64 bit version of Gentoo (one of which is Blender,
which I hope will be properly stable soon), I am planning to run x86
Gentoo (With the i686 stage3) on an AMD64 processor.
My question is this, If I enabel
On Thu, May 24, 2007 12:38 pm, Denis wrote:
My aim is to build a fast, stable system for my
computations, which ultimately brought me to another major decision:
32-bit or 64-bit... I run simulations which I write in C and
numerical computations which I run in Mathematica (which has just
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:44:10 -0400, Denis wrote:
I have an Intel D975XBX2 motherboard with an Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
processor. One Seagate SATA drive. An IDE CD-RW. Pretty much all
the controllers on the board are Intel.
One concern I have - when I configure the kernel, I fail to see
On Friday 25 May 2007 02:12:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is this, If I enabel 64 bit support in the kernel,
You mean run a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit support. There's no such thing as a
32-bit kernel with 64-bit support (at least not in x86-land).
is that
likely to cause any
I've got an interesting problem when attempting to Suspend-to-RAM (S3) and
virtual consoles. I swear, three days ago it was working and I didn't
change anything (I don't think) at least that would change how this works
(i.e. kernel, drivers, whatever)
With that said, here's my problem (and what
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 5:07 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the
Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.
On Friday 25 May 2007 02:12:49 [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Randy Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:23 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for
Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf?
Snip
If you are using a lot of memory in your
On Friday 25 May 2007 04:09:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, unless I need the upper memory support, it may be better for me to
just not click the flag for 64bit memory support, and move on?
IIRC, that's for PAE, which you definitely shouldn't use unless you have 4G of
RAM or greater.
Ticking
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:42:11 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
In particular can I share
* distfiles (DISTDIR)
* logs (PORT_LOGDIR)
Sure.
* tmp (PORTAGE_TMPDIR)
If you ever compile the same package at the same time that may not be such a
good idea. Even if it works it may be confusing. Why not
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:28 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the
Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.
On Friday 25 May 2007 04:09:00 [EMAIL
On Friday 25 May 2007 04:53:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes the difference between a 64 bit kernel, and a 32 bit kernel?
Use of 64-bit machine code [*], particularly instructions that make use of
64-bit native[**] registers[***].
* Defining this is more difficult, since that does not
What makes the difference between a 64 bit kernel, and a 32 bit kernel?
Use of 64-bit machine code [*], particularly instructions that make use of
64-bit native[**] registers[***].
Is there any slowdown for the 64-bit set-up when it has to run 32-bit software?
Aside from not having the
-Original Message-
From: Denis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:32 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the
Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.
What makes the difference between a 64 bit kernel, and a 32
Hi!
I've already asked this question on gentoo-user-de but I've got no - let's
say - convenient answer. Therefore I'll try my luck here:
Another user had some trouble because Kaffeine couldn't play .ogg-files.
In the end we found out that he activated the necessary USE-flag and
re-emerged
Am Freitag 25 Mai 2007 14:31 schrieb Denis:
What makes the difference between a 64 bit kernel, and a 32 bit kernel?
Use of 64-bit machine code [*], particularly instructions that make use
of 64-bit native[**] registers[***].
Is there any slowdown for the 64-bit set-up when it has to run
Hi,
On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:19:30 +0200 Florian Philipp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another user had some trouble because Kaffeine couldn't
play .ogg-files. In the end we found out that he activated the
necessary USE-flag and re-emerged xine-lib but Kaffeine kept using
the old lib which was
On Friday 25 May 2007, Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Changing libaries':
Another user had some trouble because Kaffeine couldn't play .ogg-files.
In the end we found out that he activated the necessary USE-flag and
re-emerged xine-lib but Kaffeine kept using the
-Original Message-
From: Florian Philipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:20 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Changing libaries
Hi!
I've already asked this question on gentoo-user-de but I've
got no - let's
say -
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alfredsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:55 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the
Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.
On Friday 25 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag 25 Mai 2007 15:39 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-Original Message-
From: Florian Philipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:20 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Changing libaries
Hi!
I've already asked this question
On Friday 25 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance,
the reason that Blender is masked, is because it does messed up things
to the save files in the AMD64 version.
http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-244/64-bits-support/
^Not anymore.
--
/PA
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:52 -0400, Dan Cowsill wrote:
I have just recently switched over to KDE and started using Konsole, and I
was
wondering something.
I really like the copy/paste functionality you find in the Linux console and
in PuTTY where you just highlight the text you want to
when I start kde as root, everything works fine
On 5/24/07, Fabio A Correa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thiago,
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
saying, it cannot contact DCop Server or connect to the X server. I
Could you please post the messages the
At Fri, 25 May 2007 11:32:48 +0200 Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:42:11 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
In particular can I share
* tmp (PORTAGE_TMPDIR)
If you ever compile the same package at the same time that may not be such a
good idea. Even if it works
On 5/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Randy Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Snip
If you are using a lot of memory in your computations, then
the 64-bit environment will be much friendlier to you :)
Also, if I understand correctly, you
Am Freitag 25 Mai 2007 18:52 schrieb Allan Gottlieb wrote:
As I mentioned, I would be dual booting into
*either* x86 or amd64. There is only one computer (my laptop)
involved; all filesystems are local.
Since the two systems can never be booted simultanously you can AFAIK share
all of those
Hi group,
I did #emerge --sync a couple of weeks ago, followed
by an update of portage. But seems every time I do $
emerge -pv some pkg it always references software
out-of-date by years sometimes. Two recent examples:
sdcc and ecasound. There are many more.
How do I tell portage to go for the
Man, when I start kde with a regular user, it takes the eternity to start,
and doesn't say any error message
On 5/25/07, Thiago Lüttig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when I start kde as root, everything works fine
On 5/24/07, Fabio A Correa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Fri, 25 May 2007 13:49:44 -0300, Thiago Lüttig wrote:
when I start kde as root, everything works fine
This sounds like a permissions problem, I've seen something like this
before. If so, the cure is
chown -R user: ~user/.kde/
--
Neil Bothwick
Bother, said Pooh as he farted in front of a
On Fri, 25 May 2007 10:27:10 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
I did #emerge --sync a couple of weeks ago, followed
by an update of portage. But seems every time I do $
emerge -pv some pkg it always references software
out-of-date by years sometimes. Two recent examples:
sdcc and ecasound.
At Fri, 25 May 2007 19:24:41 +0200 Roman Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag 25 Mai 2007 18:52 schrieb Allan Gottlieb wrote:
As I mentioned, I would be dual booting into
*either* x86 or amd64. There is only one computer (my laptop)
involved; all filesystems are local.
Since the
Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:14:53PM -0700, maxim wexler wrote
Hi group,
I connect to the web using
$sudo /usr/sbin/pon isp
on one machine(2.6.20-gentoo-r6). On another
machine(2.6.19-gentoo-r5), I get
:sudo: can't open /etc/sudoers: Permission
On 5/25/07, Andreas Claesson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you (Denis) are doing a lot of mathematical calculations you
will probably benefit from running in 64bit mode.
I often need to run Monte Carlo simulations (in C) which involve a lot
of array storage and array scanning/searching
maxim wexler ha scritto:
How do I tell portage to go for the latest stable pkg
without having to download the tarball and
compiling/installing it manually?
You probably want ebuilds for newer packages that are still not in
Portage. You can 1)file a request bug or 2)write an ebuild yourself for
http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-244/64-bits-supp
ort/
^Not anymore.
Has this migrated it's way to the portage tree yet?
I am not in a position to check. ^^;;
Yes.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
$ls -l `which sudo`
---s--x--x 1 root root 107240 2007-05-21 11:11
/usr/bin/sudo*
^ ^
setuidroot
--
Christer
Thanks Christer, never saw that command before, but
like I told Walter, a listing for sudo is indeed:
---s--x--1 2 root root
I was wrong. Sorry.
I realize now that this cannot be your problem, sudo tell you that it
is not setuid if it's not.
$ sudo chmod -s sudo
$ sudo ls
sudo: must be setuid root
Thanks Christer, never saw that command before, but
like I told Walter, a listing for sudo is indeed:
Example:
$ pwd
/usr/bin
$ ls -li sudo
8803772 ---s--x--x 2 root root 107240 2007-05-21
11:11 sudo*
$ find . -inum 8803772
./sudo
./foo
$ ls -li foo
8803772 ---s--x--x 2 root root 107240 2007-05-21
11:11 foo*
Unfortunately I do not know what's wrong, try to
-Original Message-
From: b.n. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 6:28 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage lags behind?
maxim wexler ha scritto:
How do I tell portage to go for the latest stable pkg
without having to
On Friday 25 May 2007, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Re: two identical /etc/sudoers -- only one works':
strace:
...
open(/etc/sudoers, O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES
(Permission denied)
FS corruption. Check dmesg for any errors, but fsck the filesystem
41 matches
Mail list logo
