On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:21:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally stumbled across the *REAL* reason I couldn't get it working.
I always tried configuring eth0 for it... silly me. Apparently, the
chip *ALWAYS* comes up as eth1.
Udev is doing this. If you have removed the second card,
Sascha Hlusiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 16:12:43 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
Mike Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cdrtools tarball includes a file called Makefile in every
directory. The cdrkit includes a file called CMakeList.txt in every
directory.
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now I finally got it right:
It is about the scripts. What other people may call makefiles.
The scripts and files bundled with your cdrtools to control the build
process are under CDDL.
E.g. RULES/i686-linux-gcc.rul:
You did _not_ get it
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Joerg, but again - just your opinion! If it was so obvious there
would not *be* numerous discussions keeping you busy about this! Note
that I may actually agree with your opinion about the intent of the GPL,
but that would be just *my* opinion!
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09.07.08 11:22]:
Sascha Hlusiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 16:12:43 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
Mike Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cdrtools tarball includes a file called Makefile in every
directory. The cdrkit
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09.07.08 11:57]:
Well this is because you did oversee important facts in the GPL as many
people
do who claim to have read the GPL.
As I did already explain the legal facts for using the program the schily
makefile system (you should read it to
I am installing a new system with 2008.0 on an USB pendrive as the only
disk in the machine, and at boot I get this error:
VFS: cannot open root device sda2 or unknown-block(2,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option; here are the available partitions:
0100 4096 ram0 (driver?)
0101
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2008/7/8, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229953
Try media-video/transcode-1.0.4-r3!
Thanks Daniel, the mirrors hadn't percolated yet. It just finished compiling
now.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:48:46 +0200
Miernik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am installing a new system with 2008.0 on an USB pendrive as the
only disk in the machine, and at boot I get this error:
VFS: cannot open root device sda2 or unknown-block(2,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option;
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you _carefully_ read the GPL (lawyers do it, I did it but Debian
doesn't),
you will find the following important fact:
The GPL uses the phrase under the terms of this License in all places
except
the place where it requires the
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides the fact that this is completely irrelevent (the GPL does _not_
require
what they call the scripts to be under GPL), you are missinterpreting
software and legal definitions!
This is *your* opinion of interpreting the GPL, the
I noticed there was an update to php a couple days ago, so I went to
build it for my system and I get this error:
/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/php-5.2.6-r2/work/php-5.2.6/ext/imap/php_imap.c:
In function '_php_rfc822_write_address_len':
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09.07.08 15:14]:
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you _carefully_ read the GPL (lawyers do it, I did it but Debian
doesn't),
you will find the following important fact:
The GPL uses the phrase under the terms of this License
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL discriminates between the work (which needs to be under GPL)
and the complete source which is a superset of the work and other parts
that do not need to be under GPL.
Nowhere in the whole GPL is stated that the complete source code is
On 9 Jul 2008, at 14:13, Joerg Schilling wrote:
...
I get the impression that you have problems to understand even very
obvious
parts of the GPL, it seems that you would need to enhance your
english.
You frikkin' clown, Joerg.
On 9 Jul 2008, at 10:56, Joerg Schilling wrote:
...
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really are not in a position to chastise others' English - your
English usage being quite clumsy at the *best* of times.
Wenn Du glaubst Problmeme mit meinem Englisch zu haben, dann laß uns einfach
die Diskusion in Deutsch weiterführen.
Ich befürchte
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09.07.08 15:21]:
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You obviously missread the GPL. See your other mail that verifies that you
did
not understand the GPL correctly.
No, the only thing is that I don't apply to *your* *interpretation* of
the
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da mein Englisch hier von einem Engländer kritisiert wurde muß ich wohl in
Deutsch antworten damit dieser Mensch mich besser versteht...
You obviously missread the GPL. See your other mail that verifies that you
did
not understand the GPL
2008/7/9 Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da mein Englisch hier von einem Engländer kritisiert wurde muß ich wohl in
Deutsch antworten damit dieser Mensch mich besser versteht...
You obviously missread the GPL. See your other mail that verifies
On 9 Jul 2008, at 15:05, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really are not in a position to chastise others' English - your
English usage being quite clumsy at the *best* of times.
Wenn Du glaubst Problmeme mit meinem Englisch zu haben, dann laß
uns einfach
die
I'd say this has gone on quite long enough. There *were* some nuggets
of information among Jörgs lunatic ravings, but I think it would be
best if we ended the thread. Also, who would I have to contact to get
Jörg removed from the list?
Regards,
Jan
--
Four bits at a time
www.thenybble.de
--
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:32:34 +0200
Jan Seeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this has gone on quite long enough. There *were* some nuggets
of information among Jörgs lunatic ravings, but I think it would be
best if we ended the thread. Also, who would I have to contact to get
Jörg removed
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:51:28 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Da ich es vorhin vergessen habe zu erwähnen:
This is an English speaking list, if you want to converse in another
language, please take it to private mail.
--
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Sascha Hlusiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 16:12:43 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
Mike Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[lots of stuff I regret]
I apologize to everyone for making this mess go on any longer that it
had to.
--
On Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
I'd say this has gone on quite long enough. There *were* some nuggets
of information among Jörgs lunatic ravings, but I think it would be
best if we ended the thread. Also, who would I have to contact to get
Jörg removed from the list?
why remove
The latest stable emerge of grub decided to add
splashimage=(hd0,2)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
to my grub.conf
Since I do not have support for this in my kernel the screen was
unreadable. Should I file this as a bug?
thanks,
allan
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Try add to grub.conf this line
vga=0x31B
This controls resolution and color depth of your framebuffer screen. You can
read more about this at
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=10
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Allan Gottlieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Michael George wrote:
Has anyone else had this problem?
Can you compile without the imap flag?
Maybe some underlying lib is missing...
Ciao
Francesco
--
Linux Version 2.6.25-gentoo-r6, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Sat Jul 5 18:06:28
CEST 2008
One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64
Andrew Tchernoivanov wrote:
Try add to grub.conf this line
vga=0x31B
This controls resolution and color depth of your framebuffer screen.
You can read more about this at
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=10
Hi All,
Have you seen this?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080709/ttc-us-it-internet-software-crime-e0bba4a.html
and this?
http://www.doxpara.com/
Is it merely a matter of using the right version of bind (for those who run a
bind daemon locally), or does it go further than that?
--
Regards
* Allan Gottlieb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09.07.08 20:04]:
The latest stable emerge of grub decided to add
splashimage=(hd0,2)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
to my grub.conf
Since I do not have support for this in my kernel the screen was
unreadable. Should I file this as a bug?
Your kernel
Mick schrieb:
Hi All,
Have you seen this?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080709/ttc-us-it-internet-software-crime-e0bba4a.html
and this?
http://www.doxpara.com/
Is it merely a matter of using the right version of bind (for those who run a
bind daemon locally), or does it go further than
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Mick wrote:
Is it merely a matter of using the right version of bind (for those
who run a bind daemon locally), or does it go further than that?
I have no idea how far it goes. What I can tell you is that today I
updated 3 name servers, a colleague did the other
At Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:33:21 +0200 Sebastian Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Allan Gottlieb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09.07.08 20:04]:
The latest stable emerge of grub decided to add
splashimage=(hd0,2)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
to my grub.conf
Since I do not have support for this in my
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:58:52 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Neil, Alan, Daniel, Sebastian, Stroller,... are all guilty of not just
ignoring him.
Mea culpa :(
Yes, before anyone comments, I know that's not English :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Cross a tagline and a tribble? You get a full HD...
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:25:30 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote:
splashimage has nothing to with the kernel. The kernel isn't even
loaded at this point. It's very likely that the splashimage line is
pointing to a nonexistent file.
Grub hangs if that's the case.
--
Neil Bothwick
A single fact can
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:02:59 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
The latest stable emerge of grub decided to add
splashimage=(hd0,2)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
to my grub.conf
Since I do not have support for this in my kernel the screen was
unreadable. Should I file this as a bug?
The fact
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:25:30 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote:
splashimage has nothing to with the kernel. The kernel isn't even
loaded at this point. It's very likely that the splashimage line is
pointing to a nonexistent file.
Grub hangs if that's the case.
I've
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
Have you seen this?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080709/ttc-us-it-internet-software-crime-e0bba4a.html
and this?
http://www.doxpara.com/
Is it merely a matter of using the right version of bind (for those who run a
bind daemon locally), or does it go further than
At Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:20:43 -0700 Joshua D Doll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:25:30 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote:
splashimage has nothing to with the kernel. The kernel isn't even
loaded at this point. It's very likely that the splashimage line is
At Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:15:16 +0100 Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:02:59 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
The latest stable emerge of grub decided to add
splashimage=(hd0,2)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz
to my grub.conf
Since I do not have support for this in my
Thanks for this thread. I had a bunch of gibberish on the screen,
too, after the most recent emerge and figured it was grub but didn't
know why. Strangely, the splash image was missing from /boot/grub -
is it not supposed to be in /boot or was this an ebuild error??
I found the splash image
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
If the schily makefile system was under GPL, _then_ there was a
problem because the GPL limits the freedom to use software. As the
schily makefile system is under the more free CDDL that (in contrary
to the GPL) does not limit the freedom to
On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Dirk Uys wrote:
This leads me to the question of whether this kind of conduct is
accepted on the gentoo-user mailing list. If this is indeed the case
I would accept that and deal with it in a way that I choose.
Very little is explicitly prohibited around here.
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:13:23 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:58:52 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Neil, Alan, Daniel, Sebastian, Stroller,... are all guilty of not
just ignoring him.
Mea culpa :(
Yes, before anyone comments, I know that's not
At Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:30:12 -0400 Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this thread. I had a bunch of gibberish on the screen,
too, after the most recent emerge and figured it was grub but didn't
know why. Strangely, the splash image was missing from /boot/grub -
is it not supposed to
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:20:43 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote:
Grub hangs if that's the case.
I've had exactly the same thing happen to me when I've had the path
wrong for the splashimage. You get a highly unreadable screen, but it
still works.
Did the wrong path point to something? When I got
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:20:43 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote:
Grub hangs if that's the case.
I've had exactly the same thing happen to me when I've had the path
wrong for the splashimage. You get a highly unreadable screen, but it
still works.
Did the
Hi list,
Did anyone use symfony php framework ?
I've the last ebuild available (1.0.11), but, since the recent update of the
framework to 1.1, I'm not sure how to upgrade my version, at leat I'll do
emerge -C symfony and install it by hand, but I'm not familiar with svn and
I've no need of PEAR,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble burning a 4Gb tarball at the moment. Not sure what
all the problem is but I had another DVD with one. This is the command
I use and the error less the looong list of files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # tar -xvf
At Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:03:01 +0100 Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:20:43 -0700, Joshua D Doll wrote:
Grub hangs if that's the case.
I've had exactly the same thing happen to me when I've had the path
wrong for the splashimage. You get a highly unreadable
Robert Bridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first is us an initrd to delay the mounting root until the USB
device is available.
Thanks, this fixed it. I mean did compile with genkernel --menuconfig to
cut out some unneeded stuff and still get a initrd.
The second is to pass an argument to the
52 matches
Mail list logo
