On Monday 06 June 2011 11:55:07 Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-06-06 11:16 AM, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
Not idea, I'll grant you, but it isn't *that* hard to do...
If you know the different locations to change it AND realize you need to
restart the application for changes like these to take
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:20 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
On Monday 06 Jun 2011 23:44:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:08 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
I'm not sure I understand why this happens:
Left
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:55 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/06/2011 11:32 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to
JDM wrote:
When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 init 1 seems to work as I would expect. When I
init 3 applications hang, I have to keep hitting return to get any progress. Usually I
end up rebooting as X won't start.
Question - should I be using init to change runlevels or is there a better
Dale wrote:
JDM wrote:
When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 init 1 seems to work as I
would expect. When I init 3 applications hang, I have to keep
hitting return to get any progress. Usually I end up rebooting as X
won't start.
Question - should I be using init to change runlevels or is
Thanks Dale. Will try tonight when I get home. After using Gentoo for a number
of years you get used to doing things a certain. These mailing lists really
help expand knowledge. Regards
JDM
-Original Message-
From: Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:22:27
To:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.
app-editors/nano
selected: 2.3.1
protected: none
Hi, Bill.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:11:57PM -0700, Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/06/2011 11:32 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
developer; the number of
Hi, David.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:47:37PM -0400, David Relson wrote:
Long live emacs !
emacs is an essential part of my personal toolkit. I've been using it
since 1996. For 11 yrs before that I used epsilon - an editor
with much the same keymappings.
Wow! I started in about 1997,
Hi, Indi.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:15:14PM -0400, Indi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:32:11PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
developer; the
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:10:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system
profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your
system.
!!! 'sys-apps/less' is part of your system
profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your
system.
Anyone else seeing this?
Hi, James.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:56:49PM +, James wrote:
Alan Mackenzie acm at muc.de writes:
Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
Well, you can withdraw from the volume of mail
but using gmane to interface to the list:
gmane.org
Just use an interface
Hello, Alan.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:49:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:32 on Monday 06 June 2011, Alan Mackenzie
did opine thusly:
Hi, Gentoo.
Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I
* kashani kashani-l...@badapple.net [110606 19:37]:
On 6/6/2011 4:31 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:01 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, James did
opine
thusly:
Ju want closet commando action? Check out some of my old
college buddies from Alaska:
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:54 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:10:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system
profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your
system.
!!! 'sys-apps/less' is part
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
sys-apps/less
selected: 443
protected: none
omitted: none
Changelog doesn't say much about this. I have nano, vim, more and less
installed and vim is in world. I really don't feel like adding the other
* Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com [110607 04:42]:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.
I
Hi,
I'm puzzled again by portage's logic.
When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2 and
sys-block/parted from 3.0 to 2.4
The udisks' ebuild contains
=sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
=sys-block/parted-1.8.8[device-mapper]
sys-fs/udev hasn't an
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper
use flag.
But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages?
parted 3.0 is now masked, it broke gparted and others
# Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org (5 Jun 2011)
#
Helmut Jarausch schrieb am 07.06.2011 17:36:
When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2
The udisks' ebuild contains
=sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag
But sys-fs/udev-168-r2 has an extra use flag thus
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4 is vastly improved from last time, extremely responsive
and everything is really
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work reasons,
but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to see how the
latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4 is
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Matt Harrison
iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work reasons,
but every now and then I install a gentoo
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4 is vastly improved from last time, extremely
On 07/06/2011 20:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:36 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Alan McKinnon
did opine thusly:
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:54 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Neil
Bothwick
did opine thusly:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:10:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your
On 07/06/2011 20:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
#370295
Zac responded (comment #21) to my post in that bug with quite a well-reasoned
rationale. It makes interesting reading.
It was a good response.
One question left hanging for me goes like this:
I
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:51 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote: SNIP
#370295
Zac responded (comment #21) to my post in that bug with quite a
well-reasoned rationale. It makes
On 07/06/2011 21:40, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 07/06/2011 20:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:51 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote: SNIP
#370295
Zac responded (comment
On 06/08/2011 12:17 AM, Matt Harrison wrote:
[...]
Well I eventually managed to get the vmwgfx gallium driver to compile,
but I get an undefined symbol when trying to load it with xorg. I'll
give up with it now unless anyone else has an idea. It was a nice
thought that I might get to see the
Hello
We need to setup a local repository for Gentoo, to serve the needs of our
Academic institution IIT Delhi, India. Please tell me where can we request
the access to the master repository for setting up the Gentoo repository in
our institution.
--
Abhishek
3rd Year, CSE, IIT Delhi
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:39 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
I have no problem with saying someone needs to understand what less
does. less isn't important. It's just the example at hand today. The
'problem' that I'm trying to get closer to answering is how
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:39:34 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
What I didn't like about this issue popping up yesterday is that it
altered the idea that average users never touch anything in @system.
Iin fact, TTBOMK I've never in 11 or 12 years of running Gentoo ever
done an emerge -C on a @system
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Abhishek Gupta
cs1090...@cse.iitd.ernet.in wrote:
Hello
We need to setup a local repository for Gentoo, to serve the needs of our
Academic institution IIT Delhi, India. Please tell me where can we request
the access to the master repository for setting up the
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Walter Dnes
did opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with
Alan McKinnon wrote:
OK, now we're tracking.
In the specific case of less, the answer is self-evident - it isn't needed. A
dev would just know that. More likely, he would assume he knows that.
In the general case, they suck their thumbs and guess. Some think more than
others before they guess,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Walter Dnes
did opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Latest
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:03 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Walter
Dnes
did opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
On Tue, Jun 7,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:39:34 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
What I didn't like about this issue popping up yesterday is that it
altered the idea that average users never touch anything in @system.
Iin fact, TTBOMK I've never
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:39 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
I have no problem with saying someone needs to understand what less
does. less isn't important. It's just the example at
Mark Knecht wrote:
That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system. Prior to
switching to that profile I think @system as about 150 packages. Today
it's 389:
2stable ~ # emerge -epv @system
These are the packages
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system.
SNIP
I complained about KDE stuff being in the system set long ago. It is
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I use googles
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system.
SNIP
I complained about KDE stuff being
Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
Test with IPv6 DNS record
bad (0.261s)
Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
transport.
/home/adam$ host -t www.google.com
www.google.com is an alias for www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.com
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 03:18:47 Adam Carter wrote:
Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
Test with IPv6 DNS record
bad (0.261s)
Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
transport.
/home/adam$ host -t www.google.com
52 matches
Mail list logo
