[gentoo-user] Re: System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-10 Thread Steven J. Long
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:30:33PM -0800, Grant wrote: And then attended like this: emerge -DuN world revdep-rebuild etc-update elogv emerge --depclean eclean distfiles eclean packages Am I missing any good stuff? I've recently modified update[1] to use --changed-use by default,

Re: [gentoo-user] Does anyone else have broken symlinks in /usr/share/man/man1?

2012-12-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:37:37 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I'm affected by a bug that seems to affect only some Gentoo users. dev-libs/openssl seems to install broken symlinks for some of its man pages. You can check with: Nothing here on two boxes. find /usr/share/man/ -type l !

Re: [gentoo-user] Does anyone else have broken symlinks in /usr/share/man/man1?

2012-12-10 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 12/10/2012 09:50:04 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:37:37 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I'm affected by a bug that seems to affect only some Gentoo users. dev-libs/openssl seems to install broken symlinks for some of its man pages. You can check with: Nothing here

Re: [gentoo-user] Does anyone else have broken symlinks in /usr/share/man/man1?

2012-12-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:27:03 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: find -L /usr/share/man/ -type l What about app-misc/symlinks ? That's good for finding them too, and particularly good at cleaning them up. -- Neil Bothwick Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

Re: [gentoo-user] Does anyone else have broken symlinks in /usr/share/man/man1?

2012-12-10 Thread Bruce Hill
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:27:03AM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: This is an incredibly inefficient way of testing for broken symlinks, it takes about 100 times as long to run (over ten seconds on my netbook) than find -L /usr/share/man/ -type l What about app-misc/symlinks

Re: [gentoo-user] Does anyone else have broken symlinks in /usr/share/man/man1?

2012-12-10 Thread Bruce Hill
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:27:03AM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: This is an incredibly inefficient way of testing for broken symlinks, it takes about 100 times as long to run (over ten seconds on my netbook) than find -L /usr/share/man/ -type l What about app-misc/symlinks

Re: [gentoo-user] hard disk name changes within initramfs

2012-12-10 Thread Gregory Shearman
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote: * Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de [121206 09:27]: Hi, on one of several machines I have a problem with initramfs. The machine has a single SATA drive. When the kernel boots it shows that it is called /dev/sda, Now, within the init

[gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
Hi, I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to mount because lvm doesn't seem to start before localmount (due to my root being on

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 10.12.2012 15:08, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan: Hi, I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to mount because lvm doesn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Salvatore Borgia
Hi, do you have put dolvm option in your kernel string in grub.conf? 2012/12/10 Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com Hi, I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. The problem is, raid0 array

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread James
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes: You have neglected to mention the single most important factor of all: inertia Human groups are loathe to change things that already work good enough for something that works better. Intel works good enough. Windows and Linux will be

Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-10 Thread Daniel Wagener
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:30:33 -0800 Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote: My unattended daily system maintenance procedure is like this: layman -S emerge --sync emerge -pvDuN world emerge -pv --depclean eclean -p distfiles eclean -p packages And then attended like this: emerge -DuN world

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Mail2HTML

2012-12-10 Thread Michele Beltrame
Hello! is there a easy program i can convert emails to html? Hypermail is little overload. Mail2Html find only as man page, Download links not work. Maybe this suits your needs: https://metacpan.org/module/mailbox2html Cheers, Michele. -- Michele Beltrame http://www.italpro.net/ -

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: first water cooled system

2012-12-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2012, 04:34:18 schrieb James: Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes: sensors, pwmconfig, fancontrol. No need to get the bios involved (except maybe shutdown at 95°C) Sorry, I keep getting disconnected from this install... Does this wiki look

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant: It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone think this won't happen? no two reasons: not enough power does not run x86 software the second one is a real deal breaker. -- #163933

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Kerin Millar
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: Hi, I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to mount because lvm doesn't seem to start before localmount

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant: It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone think this won't happen? no two reasons: not enough power does not run x86 software

Re: [gentoo-user] python 3.1 removed

2012-12-10 Thread Alex Schuster
James wrote: Python 2.7 is my default setting. I also had python 3.1 and 3.2 both installed. I read about how I should get rid of 3.1 and force those apps that need/want python 3 to use python 3.2. (makes sense but I did not fully research it). So I did these steps: emerge -C python:3.1

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant: It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone think this

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2012-12-10, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant: It seems like ARM processors will

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC) Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant: It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2012-12-10, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC) Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant: It seems like

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2012, 20:06:58 schrieb Grant Edwards: On 2012-12-10, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC) Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:06:58 + (UTC) Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC) Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Grant
* Linux is available for non x86 platforms. :) Only by a monumental crowd-source effort never before witnessed in the history of engineering. I'm spoiled then. Gentoo's ARM support is so complete and easy to use, I didn't realize it was a big deal. BTW, I haven't counted but it seems

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:10:12 -0800 Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote: When Apple migrate CPUs (they have now done it three times), they tweak It's starting to look like four (ARM this time): http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/12/implications-of-apple-inc-aapl-intel-corporation-intc-break-up/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Grant
When Apple migrate CPUs (they have now done it three times), they tweak It's starting to look like four (ARM this time): http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/12/implications-of-apple-inc-aapl-intel-corporation-intc-break-up/ I must be missing one: 68k - POWER POWER - Intel Intel - ARM

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:33:26 -0800 Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote: When Apple migrate CPUs (they have now done it three times), they tweak It's starting to look like four (ARM this time):

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Will ARM take over the world?

2012-12-10 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:51:15PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote It's looking promising. Not that I have a horse in the race, but I very much like ARM's low power consumption. There's an article on Slashdot about Intel's relatively new 22 nm SOC (System On Chip) design...

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Monday 10 December 2012 09:03 PM, Florian Philipp wrote: Am 10.12.2012 15:08, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan: Hi, I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. Please provide `/sbin/rc-update show`.

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Monday 10 December 2012 09:14 PM, Salvatore Borgia wrote: Hi, do you have put dolvm option in your kernel string in grub.conf? I'm using lilo and a static / monolithic kernel, so dolvm grub doesn't hold here. -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Monday 10 December 2012 11:59 PM, Kerin Millar wrote: I assisted somebody experiencing the same problem recently. The cause was simple: the individual concerned had added a runscript to the boot runlevel, whereas it should have been added to the default runlevel (net.eth0 in this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: first water cooled system

2012-12-10 Thread Andrey Moshbear
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: run burnK7 several times: Since Bulldozer v1 and up lack 3dnow, burnK7 isn't as useful as sseburn or anymore. However, sseburn does require the use of app-emulation/wine for UI purposes, so the code will

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: first water cooled system

2012-12-10 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Then use burnp6. Or burnmmx. Same packacke. No winecrap. Am 11.12.2012 05:51 schrieb Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: run burnK7 several times: Since Bulldozer v1 and up lack 3dnow, burnK7 isn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-10 Thread J. Roeleveld
Hi, I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to mount because lvm doesn't seem to start before localmount (due to my root being