On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:37:47 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I got this message when net-mail/mailbase-1.1 was emerged:
* Messages for package net-mail/mailbase-1.1:
* Your //var/spool/mail/ directory permissions differ from
* those which mailbase wants to set
Hello,
From here: http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/
We read:
The ebtables tool can be combined with the other Linux filtering tools
(iptables, ip6tables and arptables) to make a bridging firewall that is also
capable of filtering these higher network layers. This is enabled through the
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger hurdle will be the bridging-setup for running
KVM-virtualization. This was one of the reasons to go back to openrc
back then.
I have no experience with that, but if it works in OpenRC it should
work in systemd. Probably
On Tuesday 29 Jan 2013 10:19:16 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:37:47 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I got this message when net-mail/mailbase-1.1 was emerged:
* Messages for package net-mail/mailbase-1.1:
* Your //var/spool/mail/ directory
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:45 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
From here: http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/
We read:
The ebtables tool can be combined with the other Linux filtering tools
(iptables, ip6tables and arptables) to make a bridging firewall that is also
capable of
Michael Mol mikemol at gmail.com writes:
iptables and ip6tables operate at the data layer, layer 3.
ebtables operates at the link layer, layer 2.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Netfilter-packet-flow.svg
Nice diagram.
I'm surveying what's new/available for wired and
On 01/29/2013 09:45 AM, James wrote:
Hello,
From here: http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/
We read:
The ebtables tool can be combined with the other Linux filtering tools
(iptables, ip6tables and arptables) to make a bridging firewall that is also
capable of filtering these higher
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger hurdle will be the bridging-setup for running
KVM-virtualization. This was one of the reasons to go back to openrc
back then.
I have no experience
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger hurdle will be the bridging-setup for running
KVM-virtualization. This was
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:36:06 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 29 Jan 2013 10:19:16 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:37:47 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I got this message when net-mail/mailbase-1.1 was emerged:
*
Am 29.01.2013 20:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
I'll note that in your version, you're ignoring the exit statuses of
each of those commands. From a correctness standpoint, I prefer
Stefan's version.
Thanks ;-)
Also thanks to Canek for the script-version ... I knew that way but
wanted to fully take
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at
wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger
Am 29.01.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I really believe the most important thing abount systemd unit files is
that they are small and simple. You can also check the exit status
from each command in the script, or even better, you can do a test
after all the commands are done to
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 29.01.2013 20:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
I'll note that in your version, you're ignoring the exit statuses of
each of those commands. From a correctness standpoint, I prefer
Stefan's version.
Thanks ;-)
Also
Am 29.01.2013 20:33, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
When I debugged my way up to the current draft it was helpful to see
which line/command failed etc.
That's my point; you don't need (and I would venture to say, you
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 29.01.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I really believe the most important thing abount systemd unit files is
that they are small and simple. You can also check the exit status
from each command in the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not bet on that ;) too much resistance. However it is
certainly getting better and better: the LWN article on The Biggest
Myths about systemd had an overwhelmingly majority of comments
positive to systemd,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not bet on that ;) too much resistance. However it is
certainly getting better and better: the LWN article on The Biggest
Myths about
And, BTW, I didn't mean behind in the sense that Gentoo doesn't
support systemd; I meant behind in the sense that us systemd users
get a lot flak just by mention it in the list.
And that's exactly why I see Gentoo as being ahead and actually your
talking about a few of the IMO more moronic
So anyway, my memory of this is all very wishy-washy, but ebtables
turned out to be the best way to implement those inter-VM restrictions.
It could probably have been done in iptables, but ebtables made it easy
to say don't let these two talk.
I don;t know the details but I expect that would
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
[...] but lets just agree to disagree [...]
Agreed.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On 30/01/13 05:14, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
So anyway, my memory of this is all very wishy-washy, but ebtables
turned out to be the best way to implement those inter-VM restrictions.
It could probably have been done in iptables, but ebtables made it easy
to say don't let these two talk.
I
A few weeks ago, there was a brief thread re a change in a pkg
which stopped 'su' from working. It didn't affect my desktop system,
so I didn't pay much attention, but it's just hit my netbook.
Can anyone remind me what I need to do to restore it ?
--
hey..
I wonder about the last update of fcron.It is an update to 3.1.1, there
is a new /etc/crontab file, which is mixed
with /etc/fcronfcrontab, without update notice. The latest stable
version is 3.0.6 on the fcron homepage.
bye, jens.
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 07:46:48 AM IST, Philip Webb wrote:
A few weeks ago, there was a brief thread re a change in a pkg
which stopped 'su' from working. It didn't affect my desktop system,
so I didn't pay much attention, but it's just hit my netbook.
Can anyone remind me what I need
On 01/27/2013 01:06 AM, staticsafe wrote:
I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself
went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to
build. As requested by the error message:
I had the same problem, I had success with this:
26 matches
Mail list logo
