On 21/05/2013 23:36, Dale wrote:
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/20/2013 07:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I noticed over the past few weeks a interesting issue. When I leave
Seamonkey open for several hours, it looses its connection to the
internet. If I open Firefox, it works fine. I can ping
On 05/22/2013 09:51 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 21/05/2013 23:36, Dale wrote:
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/20/2013 07:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I noticed over the past few weeks a interesting issue. When I leave
Seamonkey open for several hours, it looses its connection to the
internet.
Dale wrote:
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/20/2013 07:08 PM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I noticed over the past few weeks a interesting issue. When I leave
Seamonkey open for several hours, it looses its connection to the
internet. If I open Firefox, it works fine. I can ping in a Konsole
too.
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space (10.2.2.0/8).
Every host has its own address suffix (eg. host foo
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space (10.2.2.0/8).
This isn't
Hi,
I use grml livecd for various recovery/livecd purposes. I just
add an script to my boot partition to compile current zfs. Since it is
debian based it contains installation through aptitude.
Robert.
/boot/zfs # ls
install_zfs* spl-0.6.1.tar.gz zfs_create zfs-0.6.1.tar.gz
/boot/zfs #
Hello all,
1. dev-libs/openssl-1.0.1c is current stable version
2. Reliable sources on the postfix list claim c (and d) versions have
'serious' issues:
On 2013-05-22 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
1.0.1c has some known issues, you should use 1.0.1e.
and
On 2013-05-22 12:38 PM, Quanah
On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8)
On 2013-05-22 19:52, Michael Mol wrote:
On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
On 05/22/2013 02:30 PM, Samuraiii wrote:
On 2013-05-22 19:52, Michael Mol wrote:
On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg.
On 05/22/13 14:30, Samuraiii wrote:
I'm sorry for mistake the subnet mask for both spaces IS 255.255.255.0.
so it is not overlapping at all.
I apologise for my mistake in notation.
still this is not (mainly) problem with routing but problem with
assigning name to address.
If I had superfast
On Monday 20 May 2013 11:31:31 Pandu Poluan wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a simple HTTP+FTP proxy that supports upstream
authentication.
The reason is that we (that is, my employer) have a server that requires
Internet access for its setup, but for some reason* my employer does not want
On 2013-05-22 20:52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/22/13 14:30, Samuraiii wrote:
I'm sorry for mistake the subnet mask for both spaces IS 255.255.255.0.
so it is not overlapping at all.
I apologise for my mistake in notation.
still this is not (mainly) problem with routing but problem with
On 05/22/13 15:35, Samuraiii wrote:
The only result I got was a script which every 5 minutes checked all
possible addresses of given machine (my network is not big at all -
only eight machines and one network printer). So checking around 20
addreses is not big deal - but this approach feels
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
local address space for LAN
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two networks eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:35:30PM +0200, Samuraiii wrote:
Script was just checking (by sftp with public ssh keys for unprivileged
account) if LAN (eth or wifi) address is up and if not it just assigned
address to hostname from vpn range (it did not accounted if machine is
up or down).
Hi Gentoo community,
I modified apache config to have it running on non-private
port 8080. I restarted apache and verified that it is
really listening on port 8080 (netstat). But when I check
all running apache processes for owners, I see there is still
one apache process running as root (rest
On 05/22/2013 05:01 PM, Jarry wrote:
Hi Gentoo community,
I modified apache config to have it running on non-private
port 8080. I restarted apache and verified that it is
really listening on port 8080 (netstat). But when I check
all running apache processes for owners, I see there is still
I am doing something sort of similar ... use a routing protocol and set
the metrics to make the LAN more attractive so it will get used over the
wifi. Use dhcp to update dns.
I was using ospf (quagga), dns and ISC dhcp which auto-updates bind.
This is transparent to the the hosts, is a pain to
20 matches
Mail list logo
