Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what? I'm not convinced.
What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal
with a problem that is not the general case.
I find it funny that perhaps you did not realize that you repeated
the main argument *in favour
On Tuesday 05 Nov 2013 10:52:36 Martin Vaeth wrote:
Note, however, in the long run: The process of transforming all
packages to subslot dependencies is not yet complete.
I guess it will take many years until it is: Up to some corner cases
you can check whether the process is complete for your
On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what? I'm not convinced.
What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal
with a problem that is not the general case.
I find it funny that perhaps you did not realize
Am Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:59 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what? I'm not convinced.
What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal
with a
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:04:52PM +0100, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Another round of questioning the users here.
more specifically:
* how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
* do you really have a problem with running
Alan McKinnon writes:
Excuse the top-posting; if I try inter-post between all those blockers
you'll never find what I reply :-)
I would, but for everyone else it's a mess. E-mail with line breaks is
not suited for this kind of output.
First I recommend to sync your tree again, just in case
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:29:28AM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:04:52PM +0100, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Another round of questioning the users here.
more specifically:
* how often do you experience useless rebuilds?
*
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 06:15:56AM +, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On Monday 04 Nov 2013 19:51:32 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 11/03/2013 02:27 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
For starters, you should probably merge package.keywords into
package.accept_keywords; the latter is the new
On 05/11/2013 14:11, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:59 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what? I'm not convinced.
What I'm seeing is a rather large towering
On 05/11/2013 15:37, Alex Schuster wrote:
Portage and the tree by itself isn't doing it, here's my output:
$ emerge -pvt fsrunner
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] kde-misc/fsrunner-0.7.5:4 USE=(-aqua) -debug
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:44:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I too see your viewpoint, as you see mine. There's nothing wrong with
your logic within the narrow domain of making the code that implements
this specific feature (subslots) work correctly per spec.
Background: I'm a Linux
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that you didn't read the whole post fully, and have
cherry-picked a part that you think bolsters your position.
I do not think that I have a position here.
Subslots solve some problem. If they cause inconveniences
like portage
On 05/11/2013 17:21, Bruce Hill wrote:
That is good practice, to say the least. Wish it would happen in Gentoo. But
then again, may I ask, do you have as many devs and as many pkgs that must
co-exist on so many differently configured machines?
Not even close :-)
What we lack in package
On 05/11/2013 20:06, Martin Vaeth wrote:
I predict once a week fallout from sub-slots induced bugs that was
intended to fix once a year problem.
Let's see: Forgetting to bump a subslot means that the purpose of
subslots for that package fails. A problem, but not worse than
without subslots.
I was referred back to my distro supplier for a kernel crash. Isn't
that a kernel problem?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62981
- Grant
On Tuesday 05 Nov 2013 06:15:56 Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-11-05, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:43:07PM +, Mick wrote:
On Monday 04 Nov 2013 19:51:32 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 11/03/2013 02:27 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:29:59 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
I can't understand the *need* for the new slot/subslot philosophy.
The need to it is clear. Previous methods worked by breaking things and
then fixing them, hopefully before the breakage became a problem,
whenever library APIs changed.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:28:05PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:29:59 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
I can't understand the *need* for the new slot/subslot philosophy.
The need to it is clear. Previous methods worked by breaking things and
then fixing them, hopefully before
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:02:00PM -0800, Grant wrote:
I was referred back to my distro supplier for a kernel crash. Isn't
that a kernel problem?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62981
The first thing for any crash is logs. And btw ... don't go to the Linux
kernel if you're
Re , Nikos Chantziaras said:
Since quite a while ago (months), acroread stopped working.
Side note, evince works for me on ~amd64 for viewing pdf. It also seems
to work ok with fillable pdf.
https://projects.gnome.org/evince/
-- Keith
--
Hello,
poppler fails to build for me and i don't know why.
Does someone got an idea about this?
[ 97%] Building CXX object
qt4/src/CMakeFiles/poppler-qt4.dir/ArthurOutputDev.cc.o
cd
/var/tmp/portage/app-text/poppler-0.24.3/work/poppler-0.24.3_build/qt4/src
/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't have to keep explaining subslots to me
But not every reader knows the details - this is not a private
conversation.
What I have maintained all along is that I don't see the solution as
tested to be production-ready
It has been in ~arch
22 matches
Mail list logo
