Re: [gentoo-user] Codeblocks Fails to Exit Cleanly in Awesome WM

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Specifically, when exiting in any manner, the GUI will disappear, > but the Codeblocks process continues to run. > ​Maybe related to https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1193?

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

>>I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My >>remote server is booted to a Gentoo LiveCD and I've SSH'ed in but it >>looks like the CD doesn't have ZFS tools: >> >>livecd ~ # zpool status >>-bash: zpool: command not found >> >>Can I pull this off from here or do I need to

Re: [gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Yes, and in fact it is in the output when emerge fails: > /var/tmp/portage/sys-kernel/spl-0.7.1/work/spl-0.7.1/config.log Ah-ha! I see it now. That['s valuable, and I'll take a closer look. Thanks! John

Re: [gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:54 PM, John Covici wrote: > What is your umask? I had troubles like this when I had too > aggressive umask of I think 027 rather than 022. It is indeed 027, and I wondered whether that might have been what was behind the error, hence I tried

Re: [gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:46:59 -0400, John Blinka wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > First, I appreciate your thoughts and comments. > > > > > I suspect your sources have gotten messed up in some way. I've run > > into issues like this when I

Re: [gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:46 PM, John Blinka wrote: > > I think it would be informative if I could somehow see exactly what > commands are being run when the error occurs. Is there a way of doing > that? > Yes, and in fact it is in the output when emerge fails:

Re: [gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: First, I appreciate your thoughts and comments. > > I suspect your sources have gotten messed up in some way. I've run > into issues like this when I do something like build a kernel with an > odd umask so that the portage

Re: [gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:19 PM, John Blinka wrote: > > Hope someone can shed some light on continuing emerge failures for zfs > since gnetoo-sources-4.4.39 and zfs-0.6.5.8. I was able to install > that version of zfs with that kernel last November on one of my > machines,

[gentoo-user] zfs emerge failure

Hi, Gentoo, Hope someone can shed some light on continuing emerge failures for zfs since gnetoo-sources-4.4.39 and zfs-0.6.5.8. I was able to install that version of zfs with that kernel last November on one of my machines, but have been unable to upgrade zfs since then, or to install it in any

Re: [gentoo-user] efibootmgr "Could not prepare Boot variable: Read-only file system"

On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 16:02:19 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote: > >> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced > >> inspiration. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 16:14:21 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:08 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I do suggest using libvirt, and found that > >> app-emulation/virt-manager gives you a lot of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:08 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I do suggest using libvirt, and found that >> app-emulation/virt-manager gives you a lot of the benefits of >> something with a pretty GUI like

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:02 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >>> Helmut Jarausch: >>> I'm running linux-4.12.7-gentoo with Virtualbox

Re: [gentoo-user] efibootmgr "Could not prepare Boot variable: Read-only file system"

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote: >> >> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced >> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:02 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Helmut Jarausch: >> >>>I'm running linux-4.12.7-gentoo with Virtualbox >>>BUT you need app-emulation/virtualbox and Co in version 5.1.26 >> >> Hm. My

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Helmut Jarausch: > >>I'm running linux-4.12.7-gentoo with Virtualbox >>BUT you need app-emulation/virtualbox and Co in version 5.1.26 > > Hm. My Gentoo is mostly stable. That would mean to add virtualbox to the > unstable

Re: [gentoo-user] efibootmgr "Could not prepare Boot variable: Read-only file system"

On 15 August 2017 20:17:20 GMT+02:00, Rich Freeman wrote: >On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick >wrote: >> >> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced >> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is

Re: [gentoo-user] efibootmgr "Could not prepare Boot variable: Read-only file system"

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote: > > I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced > inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is responsible for > mounting this fs? > It looks like this never did turn into a news

[gentoo-user] efibootmgr "Could not prepare Boot variable: Read-only file system"

After some years of trouble free UEFI use on a PC with a Kaveri APU, I've suddenly come across a problem of incorrectly mounted efivarfs. I realised something was amiss when I tried to set up a new kernel I had just copied into /boot/EFI/BOOT/ # tree /boot /boot ├── 42GHz2400MHz.CMO └── EFI

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Helmut Jarausch: > >>I'm running linux-4.12.7-gentoo with Virtualbox >>BUT you need app-emulation/virtualbox and Co in version 5.1.26 > > Hm. My Gentoo is mostly stable. That would mean to add virtualbox to the > unstable

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 19:01:02 Hartmut Figge wrote: > Alan McKinnon: > >Wait one day, try again. > >Wait another day, try again. > >Repeat. > > *g* > > I'm currently doing that for a new bug of SeaMonkey-Trunk. Maybe I will > determine the responsible checkin later. > > But waiting a little is

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

Alan McKinnon: >Wait one day, try again. >Wait another day, try again. >Repeat. *g* I'm currently doing that for a new bug of SeaMonkey-Trunk. Maybe I will determine the responsible checkin later. But waiting a little is a good advice. :) Hartmut

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

Helmut Jarausch: >I'm running linux-4.12.7-gentoo with Virtualbox >BUT you need app-emulation/virtualbox and Co in version 5.1.26 Hm. My Gentoo is mostly stable. That would mean to add virtualbox to the unstable part. Hm. Hartmut

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On 15/08/2017 18:14, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Greeting, > > todays update brought me a new kernel, kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo, which > required me to recompile virtualbox-modules-5.0.40. That failed. > > Searching in build.log for error 1 gives > >

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

On 08/15/2017 06:14:21 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Greeting, todays update brought me a new kernel, kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo, which required me to recompile virtualbox-modules-5.0.40. That failed. Searching in build.log for error 1 gives

Re: [gentoo-user] Codeblocks Fails to Exit Cleanly in Awesome WM

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Hi all: > > I'm having a problem with Codeblocks not exiting cleanly when using the > Awesome WM. I've filed a bug report[1] but the wrangler closed it almost > immediately without any testing or attempt to confirm, so I'm

[gentoo-user] kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo & virtualbox-modules-5.0.40

Greeting, todays update brought me a new kernel, kernel linux-4.12.5-gentoo, which required me to recompile virtualbox-modules-5.0.40. That failed. Searching in build.log for error 1 gives /usr/src/linux-4.12.5-gentoo/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:182:2: error: undefined named operand

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

On 15 August 2017 16:13:37 GMT+02:00, "C." wrote: >Rich Freeman writes: >> Is this your first Gentoo install, or your first Gentoo+ZFS install? >> If the former, you're definitely not doing this the easy way... > >Not easy, no. But definitely possible. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

On 15 August 2017 15:44:21 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: >John Covici wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:52:45 -0400, >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 15/08/2017 14:49, Grant wrote: I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My remote server is booted to a

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

On 15 August 2017 14:49:43 GMT+02:00, Grant wrote: >I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My >remote server is booted to a Gentoo LiveCD and I've SSH'ed in but it >looks like the CD doesn't have ZFS tools: > >livecd ~ # zpool status >-bash: zpool:

[gentoo-user] Codeblocks Fails to Exit Cleanly in Awesome WM

Hi all: I'm having a problem with Codeblocks not exiting cleanly when using the Awesome WM. I've filed a bug report[1] but the wrangler closed it almost immediately without any testing or attempt to confirm, so I'm asking for your help here. I am using Codeblocks-16.01 (the only unmasked

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

Rich Freeman writes: > Is this your first Gentoo install, or your first Gentoo+ZFS install? > If the former, you're definitely not doing this the easy way... Not easy, no. But definitely possible. I managed to do so. One thing to keep in mind, though, is that it might be best

[gentoo-user] Re: No beep.

On 14/08/17 21:22, Alan Mackenzie wrote: However, during the building, I discovered to my disgust that there was no loudspeaker in my new case. You sure? These days, it's not shaped like a speaker anymore, but more like... a clip-on microphone? Not sure how to describe it. It's really small

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:31 AM, John Covici wrote: > > I would like to know which cd has zfs support. I could not find one, > so I wrote some catalyst stuff to make an install cd with zfs support, > but it would be nice if I would not have to do that, a fair bit of >

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

John Covici wrote: > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:52:45 -0400, > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 15/08/2017 14:49, Grant wrote: >>> I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My >>> remote server is booted to a Gentoo LiveCD and I've SSH'ed in but it >>> looks like the CD doesn't have ZFS

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:52:45 -0400, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 15/08/2017 14:49, Grant wrote: > > I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My > > remote server is booted to a Gentoo LiveCD and I've SSH'ed in but it > > looks like the CD doesn't have ZFS tools: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

On 15/08/2017 14:49, Grant wrote: > I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My > remote server is booted to a Gentoo LiveCD and I've SSH'ed in but it > looks like the CD doesn't have ZFS tools: > > livecd ~ # zpool status > -bash: zpool: command not found > > Can I pull

[gentoo-user] Install on ZFS

I'm trying to get started on my first Gentoo install on ZFS. My remote server is booted to a Gentoo LiveCD and I've SSH'ed in but it looks like the CD doesn't have ZFS tools: livecd ~ # zpool status -bash: zpool: command not found Can I pull this off from here or do I need to mail a different

[gentoo-user] Warnings on shutting down bcache: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4378 at lib/idr.c:383

I'm getting some noise in my logs when shutting down bcache. My system: Linux gentoo 4.12.7-gentoo #1 SMP Sun Aug 13 22:56:20 CEST 2017 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Running as dom0 under Xen-4.9.0 My shutdown script loops over the bcache devices like so:

Re: [gentoo-user] mount: Permission Denied in CHROOT

On 15 August 2017 05:32:48 GMT+02:00, symack wrote: >Hello Everyone, > >New installation on an older x346 system that has a HW raid >serveraid7k. I >have the appropriate kernel driver compiled `aic79xx`. > >lscpi: > >00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation E7520 Memory Controller