On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 15:51:15 BST Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 15:58, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > I don't see them when syncing from a cron script, when all output is
> > captured and emailed, but do when running sync on a shell. It seems you
> > only see this when running sync
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 15:58, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I don't see them when syncing from a cron script, when all output is
> captured and emailed, but do when running sync on a shell. It seems you
> only see this when running sync interactively.
I see these messages in the output from my cron
On 8/3/21 3:58 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:35:41 +0200, n952162 wrote:
You should have seen a message from emerge --sync telling you that a
new version of portage was available and to run emerge -1au portage
before updating anything else.
I find no informational messages
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:35:41 +0200, n952162 wrote:
> > You should have seen a message from emerge --sync telling you that a
> > new version of portage was available and to run emerge -1au portage
> > before updating anything else.
> I find no informational messages containing "portage", "emerge",
On 8/3/21 12:52 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:20:47 +0200, n952162 wrote:
I read that, but I last updated 2 months ago. So, this update breaks
because portage was updated and new ebuilds using that are already being
pushed out?
You should have seen a message from emerge
On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 07:45:27 -0400, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> >$ emerge --ask --depclean | less
> >
> > did not work when tested with a single package to be removed: the
> > output from "emerge" was displayed on less than a single screen
> > causing "less" to just terminate due to my
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021, at 09:33, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> What I'm trying to solve is reading the
> output from "emerge --depclean" one screen full at a time and at the end
> being asked whether or not I really want to unmerge all packages listed.
> And just running
>
>$ emerge --ask
On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 11:49:23 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:55:46 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > Anyhow, I recall using git to sync a live ebuild - from some repo
> > and portage started downloading gigabytes of cruft. Presumably whole
> > decades of old commits I didn't
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:20:47 +0200, n952162 wrote:
> I read that, but I last updated 2 months ago. So, this update breaks
> because portage was updated and new ebuilds using that are already being
> pushed out?
You should have seen a message from emerge --sync telling you that a new
version of
On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:55:46 +0100, Michael wrote:
> Anyhow, I recall using git to sync a live ebuild - from some repo
> and portage started downloading gigabytes of cruft. Presumably whole
> decades of old commits I didn't need or have space for. I subsequently
> discovered I had to set
On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 02:28:09 BST John Covici wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:42:29 -0400,
>
> Michael wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, 2 August 2021 22:17:35 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > > > > I have this problem every month. Why does it
Am Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 07:10:03AM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> >> Keep in mind that both repos have the same ID - you should also rsync
> >> the cache and security directories as well as they are now out of sync
> >> (hence the warning).
> > That thought crossed my mind recently but I was
On 8/3/21 8:29 AM, cal wrote:
On 8/2/21 11:03 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/3/21 7:37 AM, cal wrote:
On 8/2/21 10:26 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/3/21 7:20 AM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/2/21 10:10 PM, David Haller wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
On 8/2/21 11:03 PM, n952162 wrote:
> On 8/3/21 7:37 AM, cal wrote:
>> On 8/2/21 10:26 PM, n952162 wrote:
>>> On 8/3/21 7:20 AM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/2/21 10:10 PM, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
>>
On 8/3/21 7:13 AM, n952162 wrote:
Hello,
can someone explain why rR?
[ebuild rR ] virtual/perl-Pod-Parser-1.630.0-r8::gentoo 0 KiB
Why would this be happening?
r reinstall (forced for some reason, possibly due to
slot or sub-slot)
R replacing
On 8/3/21 7:37 AM, cal wrote:
On 8/2/21 10:26 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/3/21 7:20 AM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/2/21 10:10 PM, David Haller wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
16 matches
Mail list logo
