Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> writes: > On 12/19/2016 10:15 AM, lee wrote: >> "Walter Dnes" <waltd...@waltdnes.org> writes: >> >>> Similarly, the vast majority of home users have a machine with one >>> ethernet port, and in the

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> writes: >> > >> >> This works for me: >> > > Nope. No change. > >> >&

Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

"Walter Dnes" writes: > Similarly, the vast majority of home users have a machine with one > ethernet port, and in the past it's always been eth0. Since 10 years or so, the default is two ports. > Now the name varies in each machine depending on the motherboard >

Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

Alan McKinnon writes: >> That doesn't keep me from noticing that what is being said is very >> different from what is being done. If the bunch of people wants to >> change that, /they/ need to do so. >> > > > I recommend you brush up on your social skills. > > Figuring

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

Jorge Almeida writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 02:48:28 -0800 Jorge Almeida wrote: >>> I tried Ctrl+click (any button) on an xterm window, to bring up the >>> menu (which I never used before; after

Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> writes: > On 18/12/2016 18:47, lee wrote: >> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: >> >>> The universe of Linux systems that are running Firefox but not >>> Pulseaudio is fairly small at this point. >>

Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

Dutch Ingraham <s...@gmx.us> writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:47:39PM +0100, lee wrote: >> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > >> Why can't they just say that they are making software for themselves the >> way they want it and don't care about what an

Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

Rich Freeman writes: > The universe of Linux systems that are running Firefox but not > Pulseaudio is fairly small at this point. Pulseaudio eats away about 10% CPU without any benefit whatsoever, not to mention that it makes things more complex and less reliable. Why would

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Well, I went about updating my system again. (day 6)

Kevin Monceaux writes: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:42:21PM -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: > >> -> Updating weekly, as I used to do is a Good Idea, Agreed. > > Sounds like a good idea. I update anywhere from daily to a few times a > week. Every once in a while I loose track

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Well, I went about updating my system again. (day 6)

Grant Edwards writes: > On 2016-12-08, Kevin Monceaux wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:42:21PM -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: >> >>> --> X11 would probably need to be shut down two which is equivalent to a >>> reboot on a desktop system anyway. >>

[gentoo-user] how to upgrade perl

Hi, how do you do an update despite perl blocking it? emerge -a --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y --keep-going @world [...] dev-lang/perl:0 (dev-lang/perl-5.22.2:0/5.22::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by =dev-lang/perl-5.22* required by

Re: [gentoo-user] how to use two graphics cards with one display

R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jun 9, 2016 4:25 PM, "lee" <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> >> R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Use Bumblebee. It is the FOSS version of Optimus. >> >> That seems to be for laptops h

Re: [gentoo-user] how to use two graphics cards with one display

Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:34:15 +0200 lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to reasonably use two graphics cards with a single >> display? >> >> SLI won't work because it's retarded in requ

Re: [gentoo-user] how to use two graphics cards with one display

R0b0t1 writes: > Use Bumblebee. It is the FOSS version of Optimus. That seems to be for laptops having peculiar hardware.

Re: [gentoo-user] Foss hardened router?

James writes: > Hello, > > > Ideally, there would be a gentoo-based hardened router for sale somewhere, > where I could merely configure iptables and add a few extra codes? > But, I cannot seem to be able to locate such a product for sale, > nor router company willing

[gentoo-user] how to use two graphics cards with one display

Hi, is there a way to reasonably use two graphics cards with a single display? SLI won't work because it's retarded in requiring the GPUs to be the same, which they aren't --- not to mention that the cards would be too far away from each other in the slots for a bridge to fit. So what I'm

[gentoo-user] speech recognition?

Hi, is there a speech recognition software or the like which is capable to listen in on a phone call in order to put on screen as text what the other person is saying? I'd like to connect that to a softphone so that someone who suffers from very bad hearing can talk to people on the phone more

Re: [gentoo-user] Arduino development on GENTOO Linux

Hi Meino Am 30.04.2016 um 12:13 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de: > One question: > Did you download the arduino-1.6.8 binary distribution or > the sources and compile those locally on your GENTOO box? I wanted a quick start so I downloaded the binary distribution:

Re: [gentoo-user] Arduino development on GENTOO Linux

Hi Meino Am 30.04.2016 um 07:36 schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de: > Hi, > > WARNING! I AM __VERY__ NEW TO ARDUINO! :) > > For a little project I need to program an Arduino board. > Since all needed lib/scatched/script - or whatever it > is called in case of the Arduino - are already implemented > by

Re: [gentoo-user] logrotate: name of log file after it's rotated?

Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> writes: > On 25/03/2016 13:46, lee wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is there a built-in way (like a place holder) to figure out what name a >> rotated log file has been given by logrotate? >> >> Here's what I'm tr

Re: [gentoo-user] New Laptop Will Be Here in Few Days

Thanks so much! On Mar 28, 2016 1:37 AM, "Adam Carter" <adamcart...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Lee <ny6...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> > FWIW i also used ~amd64 gcc, and; > CFLAGS="-march=broadwell -O2 -pipe"

Re: [gentoo-user] New Laptop Will Be Here in Few Days

Thanks! On Mar 27, 2016 11:12 PM, "Adam Carter" <adamcart...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Lee <ny6...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> New Clevo W670RZQ Laptop with 6th Gen i7 cpu, hm170 Intel chipset and on- >> board graphics. >>

[gentoo-user] New Laptop Will Be Here in Few Days

New Clevo W670RZQ Laptop with 6th Gen i7 cpu, hm170 Intel chipset and on- board graphics. Will the latest stable kernel and firmware packages work with it? Will the most recent minimal install disc be adequate for my needs, or should I go with another distribution for the purpose of having a

[gentoo-user] logrotate: name of log file after it's rotated?

Hi, is there a built-in way (like a place holder) to figure out what name a rotated log file has been given by logrotate? Here's what I'm trying to do: , [ cat /etc/logrotate.d/exim } | /var/log/exim/exim*.log { | daily | missingok | rotate 800 | compress |

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> writes: > Am Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:48:57 +0100 > schrieb lee <l...@yagibdah.de>: > >> Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Am Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:52:30 +0100 >> > schrieb lee <l...

[gentoo-user] incremental ZFS backups

Hi, when you want to use zfs send/receive to make incremental backups, do you need to keep all the snapshots you're making the backups from around indefinitely? I haven't found any documentation about how to deal with all the snapshots which would be created over time. Can they be destroyed

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> writes: > Am Sat, 20 Feb 2016 11:24:56 +0100 > schrieb lee <l...@yagibdah.de>: > >> > It uses some very clever ideas to place files into groups and into >> > proper order - other than using file mod and access times like

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> writes: > On 02/21/2016 04:36 PM, lee wrote: >> Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 02/20/2016 02:27 AM, lee wrote: >>>> Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> I looked up x2

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> writes: > On 02/20/2016 02:27 AM, lee wrote: >> Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> writes: >>> I looked up x2go and rebuilt openssh on my home server as it suggested >>> to try it out. > > I should mention I undid the h

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman writes: > develop. (Before somebody points out LUKS, be aware that Bitlocker > lets you do full-disk encyption that is secure without having to > actually type a decryption key at any point. Remove the hard drive or > boot from a CD, and the disks are unreadable

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:57 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 7:26 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >>>> Rich Freeman <ri...@

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> writes: > Am Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:46:29 +0100 > schrieb lee <l...@yagibdah.de>: > >> The time before, it wasn't >> a VM but a very slow machine, and that also took a week. You can have >> the fastest machine on the wo

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> writes: > Am Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:52:30 +0100 > schrieb lee <l...@yagibdah.de>: > >> Is WSUS of any use without domains? If it is, I should take a look at >> it. > > You can use it with and without domains. What domains g

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> writes: > Am Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:46:29 +0100 > schrieb lee <l...@yagibdah.de>: > >> >> Overcommitting disk space sounds like a very bad idea. >> >> Overcommitting memory is not possible with xen. >> &g

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Daniel Frey writes: > On 01/17/2016 10:10 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:03 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: >>> >>> I would prefer a method that is independent of OS used. And provides server >>> side limitations with regards to filesharing

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:22:02 PM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> > [...] >> > If disk-space is considered too expensive, you could even have every VM

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: > On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 01:46:29 AM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 01:46:45 AM lee wrote: >> >> "J. Roeleveld"

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:08 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> >> BTW, is it as easy to give a graphics card to a container as it is to >> give it a network card? > > I've never tried it, but I'd think that the co

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> >> How does that work? IIUC, when you created a snapshot, any changes you >> make

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Alec Ten Harmsel <a...@alectenharmsel.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:56:21PM +0100, lee wrote: >> Alec Ten Harmsel <a...@alectenharmsel.com> writes: >> > >> > Depends on how the load is. Right now I have a 500GB HDD at work. I use >>

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 01:46:45 AM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> > On Monday, January 18, 2016 02:02:27 AM lee wrote: >> >> "J. Roeleveld" &l

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman writes: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel > wrote: >> >> All Joost is saying is that most resources can be overcommitted, since >> all the users will not be using all their resources at the same time. >> > > Don't want to

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Alec Ten Harmsel <a...@alectenharmsel.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:46:45AM +0100, lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> >> > On Monday, January 18, 2016 02:02:27 AM lee wrote: >> >> "J. Roeleveld

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" writes: > [...] > If disk-space is considered too expensive, you could even have every VM use > the same base image. And have them store only the differences of the disk. > eg: > 1) Create a VM > 2) Snapshot the disk (with the VM shutdown) > 3) create a new

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: > On Monday, January 18, 2016 02:02:27 AM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> > On 17 January 2016 18:35:20 CET, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> &

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

<waben...@gmail.com> writes: > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > >> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:38 AM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> >> Suppose you use a VPN connection. H

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 7:26 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: >> >>> However, while an RDP-like solution protects you from some types of >>> attacks, it stil

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" writes: > On 17 January 2016 18:35:20 CET, Mick wrote: > [...] >>I use the icaclient provided by Citrix to access my virtual desktop at >>work, >>but have never tried to set up something similar at home. What >>opensource

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:38 AM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> Suppose you use a VPN connection. How do does the client (employee) >> secure their own network and the machine they're using to work remotely >> then? &g

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Mick writes: > On Saturday 16 Jan 2016 09:39:24 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 16/01/2016 06:17, Grant wrote: >> > I'm considering allowing some employees to work from home but I'm >> > concerned about the security implications. Currently everybody shows up >> > and logs

Re: [gentoo-user] (Re-) Configuring X11 with two graphic cards (NVidia)

meino.cra...@gmx.de writes: > Hi, > > previously there were two graphic cards installed in my Gentoo box: > > Geforce GT 430 > Geforce GT 560TI > > The first was used for desktop purposes only and the second was used > only by Blender as "render engine". > > Then the Geforce GT 560TI went crazy

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:55:27 +0100, lee wrote: > >> > Firstly, things like Flash and Skype are not special cases, they are >> > widely used and many of us have to use them, whether we like it or >> > not. >

Re: [gentoo-user] snapshots?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: >> >>> >>> I would run btrfs on bare partitions and use btrfs's raid1 >>> capabilities.

Re: [gentoo-user] Nouveau blank screen

Håkon Alstadheim writes: > I have an old but good graphics card, "NVIDIA Corporation GT200GL > [Quadro FX 3800]". The proprietary driver is EOL, not supported after > kernel 3.14.*, so I'd like to switch to nouveau. I'm having trouble > getting nouveau to work at all,

Re: [gentoo-user] snapshots?

Neil Bothwick writes: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:22:59 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> > There's no need to use RAID for swap, it's not like it contains >> > anything of permanent importance. Create a swap partition on each >> > disk and let the kernel use the space as it wants.

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:25:05 +0100, lee wrote: > > [...] >> >> That there are a few special cases for which some people still need it >> doesn't mean that everyone should be forced to use a multilib profile >

Re: [gentoo-user] snapshots?

Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 23:16:48 +0100, lee wrote: > >> > I would run btrfs on bare partitions and use btrfs's raid1 >> > capabilities. You're almost certainly going to get better >> > performance, a

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:37:55 +0100, lee wrote: > >> > What about things like flash plugins? Those are often wanted on >> > desktops and need multilib. >> >> Flash sucks, and fortunately, it's dead. >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:41:25 +0100, lee wrote: > >> > Try Neil's suggestion of using a chroot and NFS exporting. I use it >> > here to good effect. >> >> I must be missing his posting? > > It's in the

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE5 stuff and media-libs/mlt conflict

Peter Humphrey writes: > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 04:26:20 Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I was going to try out some of the KDE5 stuff just to see if I'm going >> to like it or not. Anyway, I added a BUNCH of stuff to a keywords file >> related to KDE and got past that

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE5 stuff and media-libs/mlt conflict

Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> writes: > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 14:34:38 lee wrote: >> Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> writes: >> > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 04:26:20 Dale wrote: >> >> Howdy, >> >> >> >> I wa

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> writes: > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 14:18:12 lee wrote: > >> Is there a way to offload the preprocessing to the server, and can >> compiling on localhost be avoided as much as possible somehow? > > Try Neil's suggestion of us

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Jeremi Piotrowski <jeremi.piotrow...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:49 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> The gui monitor doesn't seem to exist. > > Recompile distcc with the gtk use flag. Oh, I thought that was an extra package ...

Re: [gentoo-user] snapshots?

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 5:42 AM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> "Stefan G. Weichinger" <li...@xunil.at> writes: >> >>> btrfs offers RAID-like redundancy as well, no mdadm involved here. >>> >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Frank Steinmetzger writes: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 04:38:56PM -0600, Dale wrote: > >> >>> what's taking so long when emerging packages despite distcc is used? >> >>> […] >> >>> Some compilations are being run on the remote machine, so distcc does >> >>> work. The log file on

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

<waben...@gmail.com> writes: > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > >> <waben...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> what's taking so long when emergin

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

writes: > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:48:42PM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> > P.S.: distccmon is a good tool to watch the compilation processes. >> >> I never got it to display anything. I just tried it again: synced >>

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Frank Steinmetzger writes: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:48:42PM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > >> P.S.: distccmon is a good tool to watch the compilation processes. > > I never got it to display anything. I just tried it again: synced portage > and ran a world update -- 16

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

writes: > wrote: > >> >> I used a pentium 4 laptop as client and two phenom2 quadcore pc as >> server. I don't remember the settings that I used but I think it >> was something about -j10 or so. > > Sorry, I think it was about -j16 (twice the totally

[gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

Hi, what's taking so long when emerging packages despite distcc is used? I have disallowed compiling on the local machine (which is the one emerge is running on) through distcc settings because the local machine is relatively slow. Yet I can see some gcc processes running on the local machine,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerging with distcc: What's taking so long?

<waben...@gmail.com> writes: > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> what's taking so long when emerging packages despite distcc is used? >> >> I have disallowed compiling on the local machine (which is the one >> emerge is running on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gcc 5.3

Paul Colquhoun <paul...@andor.dropbear.id.au> writes: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:32:44 lee wrote: >> Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: >> > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:21:01 +0100, lee wrote: > [...] >> >> So if I'd never explicitly update ever

Re: [gentoo-user] Kmail2 - I have not given up ... yet

"J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: > On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 09:32:55 PM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: >> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 29 Dec 20

Re: [gentoo-user] snapshots?

"Stefan G. Weichinger" <li...@xunil.at> writes: > On 12/30/2015 10:14 PM, lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> soon I'll be replacing the system disks and will copy over the existing >> system to the new disks. I'm wondering how much merit there would be in

Re: [gentoo-user] major problem after samba update

cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > >> cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: >> >> > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> > >> >> cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: >> >> >> >> > lee <l...@yagi

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gcc 5.3

Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:21:01 +0100, lee wrote: > >> > As 4.9.3 is marked stable, I guess that's what'd you get per >> > default. >> >> 4.8.5 >> >> I'd have to run emerge --sync to know about mor

Re: [gentoo-user] Maybe bug? (glibc related?)

Elias Diem writes: >> Whether this is a bug or not depends on what you're supposed to expect, >> which I don't know. If someone would run the test suite on a >> non-hardened profile and got the same warning from gcc, but vim wouldn't >> be terminated when the segmentation

Re: [gentoo-user] Kmail2 - I have not given up ... yet

"J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> writes: > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote: >> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote: >> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and >> > maintain a fully fledge

[gentoo-user] snapshots?

Hi, soon I'll be replacing the system disks and will copy over the existing system to the new disks. I'm wondering how much merit there would be in being able to make snapshots to be able to revert back to a previous state when updating software or when installing packages to just try them out.

Re: [gentoo-user] Maybe bug? (glibc related?)

Elias Diem <li...@webconect.ch> writes: > Hi lee > > On 2015-12-29, lee wrote: > >> Elias Diem <li...@webconect.ch> writes: >> >> > Hi >> > >> > I just got the following while running Vim's testsuite. >> > >> &

Re: [gentoo-user] Kmail2 - I have not given up ... yet

Mick writes: > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications. >> For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more >> advanced needs to be used. > > I like sqlite because it is

Re: [gentoo-user] major problem after samba update

cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > >> cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: >> >> > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> > >> >> cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: >> >> >> >> > Hi. I just u

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gcc 5.3

David Haller <gen...@dhaller.de> writes: > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, lee wrote: >>Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> writes: >>> There will be no 5.3.1 likely. Numeration scheme is changed from 5.x >>> series: what was middle version is now ma

Re: [gentoo-user] major problem after samba update

cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: > lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > >> cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: >> >> > Hi. I just upgraded from samba 4.1.x to 4.2.7 and in one of my shares, >> > I can not access any subfolders of that share. It usually gives me

Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES

"siefke_lis...@web.de" writes: > Hello, > > i try to run iptables, block bad ips and close the system. > > I want run firewall which block all INPUT, only ALLOW services i defined. > Ipset want to use to block spam ips, make it sure awesome as ever set rules > manuell.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gcc 5.3

Andrew Savchenko writes: > On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:40:48 -0800 walt wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:18:27 -0500 >> Alan Grimes wrote: >> >> > Hey, thanks for putting out gcc 5.3... >> > >> > Unfortunately, it fails to bootstrap on my machine. I am

Re: [gentoo-user] Maybe bug? (glibc related?)

Elias Diem writes: > Hi > > I just got the following while running Vim's testsuite. > > > *** buffer overflow detected ***: vim terminated; report to > > Makefile:151: recipe for target 'af.ck' failed > make[2]: *** [af.ck] Killed > > > The

Re: [gentoo-user] major problem after samba update

cov...@ccs.covici.com writes: > Hi. I just upgraded from samba 4.1.x to 4.2.7 and in one of my shares, > I can not access any subfolders of that share. It usually gives me some > kind of windows permission error, or just location not available. > Windows tells me I can't even display the

Re: [gentoo-user] arp question

Adam Carter writes: >> Yes, I already tried that and didn't get any traffic listed. >> > > In that case it sounds like linux has bridged them across from the other > interface. Does this find anything? > tcpdump -i enp2s0 net 192.168.1.0/24 > > If it doesn't maybe generate

Re: [gentoo-user] arp question

Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:14 AM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: >> >> They are connected to different vlans on the same switch, so they don't >> share the same broadcast domain. The switch shows the mac addresses of >&g

Re: [gentoo-user] arp question

Adam Carter writes: >> They are wrong because there is no way for network traffic from the >> devices on the LAN to make it to the interface enp2s0. Or, if they do >> make it there, then there is something else seriously wrong. >> > > tcpdump -i enp2s0 arp > > will tell

Re: [gentoo-user] arp question

Rich Freeman writes: > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Adam Carter wrote: >>> grandstream.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.80) auf 00:0b:82:16:ed:9e [ether] auf >>> enp2s0 >>> grandstream.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.80) auf 00:0b:82:16:ed:9e [ether] auf >>> enp1s0 >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] arp question

Adam Carter writes: >> >> grandstream.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.80) auf 00:0b:82:16:ed:9e [ether] auf >> enp2s0 >> grandstream.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.80) auf 00:0b:82:16:ed:9e [ether] auf >> enp1s0 >> spa.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.81) auf 88:75:56:07:44:c8 [ether] auf enp2s0 >>

[gentoo-user] arp question

Hi, any idea why I have entries in the arp table like this: grandstream.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.80) auf 00:0b:82:16:ed:9e [ether] auf enp2s0 grandstream.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.80) auf 00:0b:82:16:ed:9e [ether] auf enp1s0 spa.yagibdah.de (192.168.3.81) auf 88:75:56:07:44:c8 [ether] auf enp2s0

[gentoo-user] mouse cannot use until retach

Hi, everyone. I have a very starge phenomenon for a long time. I note that when I boot my computer with mouse attached, the mouse couldn't be recognized on sddm login ui. But I can see my mouse powered before sddm started. Strangely mouse can be recognized after I pull it out and insert it in

Re:[gentoo-user] mouse cannot use until retach

I cannot use my mice at sddm-greeter but I can use my synaptics. When I login my kde, I just retach my mice, and it works again. I am use sddm 0.13-r1 and kf-5.15, plasma-5.4.1, qt-5.4.2, gcc-4.9.3, glibc-2.21-r1. -- 为爱上色 公益活动 在 2015-12-06 08:46:41，"Wallance Lee" <ha...@126

Re: [gentoo-user] resolving names of local hosts locally

Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> writes: > On Wednesday 02 December 2015 20:37:34 lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to configure bind so that the names of local hosts, >> i. e. the ones bind is authoritative for, can be resolved without a >> con

Re: [gentoo-user] resolving names of local hosts locally

Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> writes: > On 02/12/2015 21:37, lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to configure bind so that the names of local hosts, >> i. e. the ones bind is authoritative for, can be resolved without a >> connection to the

[gentoo-user] resolving names of local hosts locally

Hi, is there a way to configure bind so that the names of local hosts, i. e. the ones bind is authoritative for, can be resolved without a connection to the internet? I don't like it at all that when the internet connection goes out, no name resolution at all is possible. Since the information

Re: [gentoo-user] Weird "df" output

waltd...@waltdnes.org writes: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:57:20AM +0100, lee wrote > >> He said that he "has a primary partition 1, which covers the entire >> hard drive" and "a small / partition". That made me think that he >> has two disks. >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >