Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's
Hi,
I'm interested in using Ingo Molnar's realtime-preempt kernel
patches with a Gentoo kernel. I already use them with a Kernel.org
kernel but would prefer to one day see these be part of what Gentoo
supplies. This morning I did a --dry-run and see some messages like
this:
patching file
Mark Knecht wrote:
QUESTIONS:
1) Can I assume that whatever happened with the Hunk #x succeeded
that everything is OK? Maybe this was just a line number issue?
Yeah .. or and indent change or something similar.
2) What can I do about the Hunk #x FAILED messages?
Well to get that patch
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
QUESTIONS:
1) Can I assume that whatever happened with the Hunk #x succeeded
that everything is OK? Maybe this was just a line number issue?
Yeah .. or and indent change or something similar.
2) What can I do
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the response. There were just two problems, as best I
can tell. One was in the upper level makefile which the second was in
a more tecnical piece of code. I'm providing the output here more for
Christian,
Again, thanks for the info. It's very helpful. I'll investigate
this more this evening.
cheers,
Mark
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the response. There
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's what
this means.
Or am
7 matches
Mail list logo
