On 1/24/24 13:24, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:01 AM Thelma mailto:the...@sys-concept.com>> wrote:
>
> Is anybody using extension: net-misc/chrome-remote-desktop in Gentoo?
>
> The package installed OK, but Google I think only supports Windows and Mac.
OK, I hesitate to
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:01 AM Thelma wrote:
>
> Is anybody using extension: net-misc/chrome-remote-desktop in Gentoo?
>
> The package installed OK, but Google I think only supports Windows and
Mac.
OK, I hesitate to delve into this too much but I did use it a 5-6 years ago
on Gentoo, but
Is anybody using extension: net-misc/chrome-remote-desktop in Gentoo?
The package installed OK, but Google I think only supports Windows and Mac.
After installing Google Chrome, when I go to a login page, a window pops up asking to
"Enter password for keyring 'default' to unlock".
Clicking Cancel starts the browser but keyboard is disable and mouse doesn't
response either in the browser.
So the solution to delete:
rm
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 21:49:59 - (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> verything seemed to be fine (IIRC, it upgraded chrome).
>
> emerge --depeclean --ask
>
> That removed a couple wayland packages (yay! I didn't really want
> wayland). Then it warned me
>
>!!! existing preserved libs:
>
I just did my usual
emerge --sync
emerge -auvND world
Everything seemed to be fine (IIRC, it upgraded chrome).
emerge --depeclean --ask
That removed a couple wayland packages (yay! I didn't really want
wayland). Then it warned me
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 5:58 PM Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021, 8:19 AM Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>>
>> Am Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:53:57AM -0700 schrieb Mark Knecht:
>>
>> > Starting yesterday morning both of my KDE machines no longer show a
system
>> > title bar or border for
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021, 8:19 AM Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:53:57AM -0700 schrieb Mark Knecht:
>
> > Starting yesterday morning both of my KDE machines no longer show a
> system
> > title bar or border for Chrome, and only Chrome. All other apps are fine.
> > Right
Am Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:53:57AM -0700 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> Starting yesterday morning both of my KDE machines no longer show a system
> title bar or border for Chrome, and only Chrome. All other apps are fine.
> Right clicking the Chrome tab area has a checkbox for 'Use system title bar
>
On 2021/09/24 at 09:42am, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Kubuntu updated Chrome this morning but the problem still exists.
I use Fluxbox and had the same issue. Found this today:
https://piunikaweb.com/2021/09/23/google-chrome-94-use-system-title-bar-and-borders-checkbox-broken/
To fix the problem:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:10 AM Steve Evans wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:53:57 -0700
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Sorry to cross post. I put this on the KDE list yesterday but no
> > responses. As I run Kubuntu I thought that it would be a better place
> > to start.
> >
> > Starting
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:53:57 -0700
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Sorry to cross post. I put this on the KDE list yesterday but no
> responses. As I run Kubuntu I thought that it would be a better place
> to start.
>
> Starting yesterday morning both of my KDE machines no longer show a
> system title bar
Sorry to cross post. I put this on the KDE list yesterday but no responses.
As I run Kubuntu I thought that it would be a better place to start.
Starting yesterday morning both of my KDE machines no longer show a system
title bar or border for Chrome, and only Chrome. All other apps are fine.
Hello,
since V 40 from Google Chrome the Browser will not imaging the complete
window. Only when open tab or open link the complete window will work
Has someone same expierence and found fix?
http://pasteboard.co/IZI3x7U.png
Thank you for help Nice Day
Silvio
Dear All,
Has anybody experienced that the Chrome browser is able to eat all of
memory? I have this issue on both Linux and Win 7 as well. I assume
flash could be the main issue. However, facebook, gmail and g+ eat
more than 100 MByte memory.
It's annoying...
--
- -
-- Csanyi Andras (Sayusi
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:36 +0100, András Csányi wrote:
Has anybody experienced that the Chrome browser is able to eat all of
memory? I have this issue on both Linux and Win 7 as well. I assume
flash could be the main issue. However, facebook, gmail and g+ eat
more than 100 MByte memory.
On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Chromium is not the problem, Flash is the problem.
Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe are a bunch of
fools that cannot code properly or securely. I can comfortably say this based
on long hard
On Saturday 25 June 2011 18:38:10 András Csányi did opine thusly:
On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Chromium is not the problem, Flash is the problem.
Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe
are a bunch of fools that cannot code
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This will never change, because you can't pick up a turd by the clean end.
ROFLMBO That is so true.
I have to add. I subscribe to some service that emails security
problems, usually when they are fixed but anyway. I get a LOT of those
related to flash. If you
On Saturday 25 June 2011 13:39:33 Dale did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This will never change, because you can't pick up a turd by the
clean end.
ROFLMBO That is so true.
I have to add. I subscribe to some service that emails security
problems, usually when they are fixed but
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Well there's a few options:
Adobe could publish the entire Flash spec so that projects like gnash
could implement them fully
or the web could largely use something else instead like HTML5
Both options are unlikely, more's the pity
I know HTML5 is a ways off but I'm
On Saturday 25 June 2011 14:39:40 Dale did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Well there's a few options:
Adobe could publish the entire Flash spec so that projects like
gnash could implement them fully
or the web could largely use something else instead like HTML5
Both options
On 2011/06/03 19:49 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 12:50:02AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Mick wrote:
Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably well coded to
replace flash,
I do hope that html5 will do away with it altogether.
you can
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:49 on Thursday 02 June 2011, András Csányi
did opine thusly:
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is very new for me!
I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
really like it.
On Thursday 02 June 2011 10:49:44 András Csányi wrote:
what is hard about a killall -9 chrome?
On 2 June 2011 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thursday 02 June 2011 10:49:44 András Csányi wrote:
what is hard about a killall -9 chrome?
Nothing. But as far I remember the process called chromium not chrome
and you know before I type something into console I
I don't have spare time for philosophical stuff (and it's not amongst
my insterests anyway). But, you can always use some extension to block
flash contents. Then you click only in the flashes you want to see.
That will probably help to narrow down the scope of the problem. So,
try adblock and
On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
While I wrote this letter Chromium become crazy again - thanks the
automatic save few words has lost this letter - and I know that the
root cause the Chromium itself and the flash isn't matter. Flash just
make faster that
Am 02.06.2011 14:27, schrieb András Csányi:
Why die another applications if the browser crashes? For example
console stuffs as htop, grep, less and others? Harmed seriously the
graphic abilities of the system in this case?
For me that looks like a problem of some other kind (maybe hardware
On 2 June 2011 14:38, Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 14:27, schrieb András Csányi:
Why die another applications if the browser crashes? For example
console stuffs as htop, grep, less and others? Harmed seriously the
graphic abilities of the system in this
On 02.06.2011 13:42, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
I don't have spare time for philosophical stuff (and it's not amongst
my insterests anyway). But, you can always use some extension to block
flash contents. Then you click only in the flashes you want to see.
That will probably help to narrow
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:30:02AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:49 on Thursday 02 June 2011, András Csányi
did opine thusly:
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is very new for me!
I have this
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is very new for me!
I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
really like it. But, sometimes, when I see
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is very new for me!
I have this fantastic
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:47 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
Maybe before throwing out the baby with the bathwater he should do some
more testing in another browser. In the past I've seen behavior not
unlike that described due to flash, but if flash is the culprit
On Thursday 02 June 2011 11:44:26 András Csányi wrote:
On 2 June 2011 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 02 June 2011 10:49:44 András Csányi wrote:
what is hard about a killall -9 chrome?
Nothing. But as far I remember the process called
2011/6/2 András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is very new for me!
I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
really like it. But, sometimes, when I see flash videos on different
On Thursday 02 June 2011 09:23:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is very new for me!
I have this fantastic browser called Chromium
On 6/2/2011 10:40 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
but this is
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:27 on Thursday 02 June 2011, András Csányi
did opine thusly:
On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
While I wrote this letter Chromium become crazy again - thanks the
automatic save few words has lost this letter - and I know
On 2 June 2011 20:22, Leonardo Guilherme leonardo.guilhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Those lockups reminds me of hard disks lockups, when nothing works anymore
exepct what was already been loaded on RAM. Maybe flash/chrome is writing to
a broken area of your disk. Check the HD light, weird noises. Or
41 matches
Mail list logo
