-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH28bX8hUIAnGfls4RAvPaAJ9iVi3RdAD798CYdMQJC0AsGuNjIQCgiRD/
Chris Brennan wrote:
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
We got this one. I saw one other one too.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| Dale
|
| :-) :-)
Ya but you didn't answer my question :D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7
Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| Dale
|
| :-) :-)
Ya but you didn't answer my question :D
Sometimes the mail server filters them out. I read that ?gmail? and a
few
Chris Brennan wrote:
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On 16/03/2008, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes the mail server filters them out. I read that ?gmail? and a
few others do that. Not sure why or how to over come it tho. Somewhat
common from my reading.
I concur with that... gmail seems to filter out duplicates from all my
mail
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| Dale
|
| :-) :-)
Ya but you didn't answer my question :D
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norberto Bensa wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
|
|
|
Indeed I am, appeears to be the only reliable free mail service I have
access to at the moment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
| Dale wrote:
| | Chris Brennan wrote:
| | How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
| |
| | We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| | Dale
| |
| | :-) :-)
|
| Ya
I believe that is true.
In gmail we usually see our own posts because it composes the
conversations not only with the received messages, but also with the
sent ones (in the sent messages label)
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008,
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:53:43 -0400
Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
/* offtopic
Please, don't hijack threads. It is irritating for people using
thread-aware e-mail clients. Even more it is offending to the original
poster, because they
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I saw one other one too.
| Dale
|
| :-) :-)
Ya
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| We got this one. I
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same
address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour for any
list run by a non-idiot (like this one)
Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do people get their
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 16:31 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I
On 15/03/2008, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address
as what sent it.
That's unfortunate as it screws up GMail's conversation feature - also
the list email serves as confirmation that your message has got
through.
Can
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the
same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour
for any list run by a non-idiot (like this one)
Is that so?
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
OK, lets go back to step 1, and try to think it through this time.
- a user sends a mail from account X to list Y
- same user is also subscribed to list Y from account X
- if list Y sends a copy of the mail to the user at account X, then
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
| On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
| On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
| The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the
| same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes well, I am using thunderbird and my mail is stored on a remote
server on my lan, so I can check my mail from any machine in my house.
So yes, I am using Google Apps to host my e-mail, it's convenient for me
and meets me needs and requirements.
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:31:53 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Dale wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address
as what sent it.
Of course it does.
That you don't see it doesn't mean the list server doesn't send it.
This is pretty usual behaviour for any list run by a
non-idiot (like this one)
No it
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the
same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour
for any list
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Alan Milnes wrote:
On 15/03/2008, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address
as what sent it.
That's unfortunate as it screws up GMail's conversation feature - also
the list email serves as
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Norberto Bensa wrote:
| Chris Brennan wrote:
| How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
|
| You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
Indeed I am, appeears to be the only reliable free mail service I have
access to at the moment
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag, 15. März 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
OK, lets go back to step 1, and try to think it through this time.
- a user sends a mail from account X to list Y
- same user is also subscribed to list Y from account X
- if list Y sends a copy of the mail to the
On 15 Mar 2008, at 13:35, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same
address
as what sent it.
It does here.
This is pretty usual behaviour for any list run by a
non-idiot (like this one)
Usually it's a user-configurable option, obviously
On 15 Mar 2008, at 13:27, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Chris Brennan wrote:
How come I don't see my own posts to this list?
You seem to be using google for mx... ;-)
And to expand on that, this is an FAQ for Gmail users.
http://tinyurl.com/32h53h
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:31:53 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do people get their
original messages back?
There's a copy already in their outbox? And a sane mailer (like say
kmail) will have put the sent copy there already.
The original goes
29 matches
Mail list logo
