On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Mick wrote:
>
> I am mostly happy with openrc and therefore have no reason to move to the
> systemd monoculture, unless gentoo falls in line with Debian et al. and leaves
> me no choice.
>
I don't really see that happening anytime soon - it will be more
likely to b
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 12:18:09 Rich Freeman wrote:
> That would be udev. It has been around long before systemd, and you
> must have missed the huge flamewar when they renamed it to
> systemd-udevd. Maybe we'll see "java" renamed to
> "java-by-oracle-with-ask-toolbar" next. :)
TBH I wouldn't b
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
>> though, ready to take over the world the next time you aren't looking :-)
>
> Ha! I can already see this one:
>
>
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
> > .., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
> > and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
>
> I bet you have quite a lot of systemd component
On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
> .., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
> and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
though, ready to take over the wo
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 12:26:09 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
> >
> > Mick wrote:
> >> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> >> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
>
On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
> Mick wrote:
>
>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
>> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
>> want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
> For them to hav
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
Mick wrote:
> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
> want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
For them to have support for sleep and hibernate, someone needs
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 10:08:53 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
> >>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> >>> gentoo user will have to switch fr
On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
>>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
>>> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
>>> want/need to continue using sle
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
> > Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
> > gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
> > want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
>
> For those t
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
>>> On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
>>>
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely w
On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
> >> still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code ha
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
>> still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been
>> bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils.
>>
>> Anyone th
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
> still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been
> bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils.
>
> Anyone that feels like doing it can now step up t
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 10:39:10 »Q« wrote:
> I figured out what I wanted to do (uninstall upower, install
> upower-pm-utils) by reading the changelogs, but I don't know what my
> other options were. Could I have stuck with upower, letting it pull in
> systemd, without messing up openrc?
Apparen
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:14:56 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> (I think I'll be forced to write up some minimal news item just to
> shut up the loud minority who can't be bothered to do anything
> themselfs, like even read package ChangeLogs if they stumble upon
> something manual.)
I figured out w
17 matches
Mail list logo
