On Di, 01 Aug 16:09:07 +
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2017-08-01, Floyd Anderson wrote:
If you look at
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
It showls eleven versions for amd64 in green with a '+' symbol. I
thought that meant they
On 2017-08-01, Floyd Anderson wrote:
>>If you look at
>>
>> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
>>
>>It showls eleven versions for amd64 in green with a '+' symbol. I
>>thought that meant they were stable. But, as there's no key on that
>>page explaining what the
On Di, 01 Aug 15:33:11 +
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2017-08-01, Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>>
On 2017-08-01, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now.
>> >
>> > OK, next dumb
On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now.
> >
> > OK, next dumb question:
> >
> > There are 11 versions marked as stable for
On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
>> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now.
>
> OK, next dumb question:
>
> There are 11 versions marked as stable for amd64. How does one find
> out which version of GCC one is
Hi,
I guess most devs test their ebuilds with the latest stable version of gcc.
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 1 Aug 2017, 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
>> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now.
>
> OK, next dumb
On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now.
OK, next dumb question:
There are 11 versions marked as stable for amd64. How does one find
out which version of GCC one is "expected to be on"?
--
Grant Edwards
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 31.07.2017 kell 21:00, kirjutas Grant Edwards:
> On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-
> > > layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
> > > note: use
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote:
>
>> otherwise you'd have to pass one of the suggested flags to the
>> compiler somehow.
>
> Aren't required gcc versions and/or flags supposed to be specified
>
On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
>> note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to
>> compile your code
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo