Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Floyd Anderson
On Di, 01 Aug 16:09:07 + Grant Edwards wrote: On 2017-08-01, Floyd Anderson wrote: If you look at https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc It showls eleven versions for amd64 in green with a '+' symbol. I thought that meant they

[gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-08-01, Floyd Anderson wrote: >>If you look at >> >> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc >> >>It showls eleven versions for amd64 in green with a '+' symbol. I >>thought that meant they were stable. But, as there's no key on that >>page explaining what the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Floyd Anderson
On Di, 01 Aug 15:33:11 + Grant Edwards wrote: On 2017-08-01, Mick wrote: On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote: On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >>

[gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-08-01, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: >> > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. >> > >> > OK, next dumb

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. > > > > OK, next dumb question: > > > > There are 11 versions marked as stable for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. > > OK, next dumb question: > > There are 11 versions marked as stable for amd64. How does one find > out which version of GCC one is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Rasmus Thomsen
Hi, I guess most devs test their ebuilds with the latest stable version of gcc. Regards, Rasmus Original Message On 1 Aug 2017, 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. > > OK, next dumb

[gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-08-01 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. OK, next dumb question: There are 11 versions marked as stable for amd64. How does one find out which version of GCC one is "expected to be on"? -- Grant Edwards

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-07-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 31.07.2017 kell 21:00, kirjutas Grant Edwards: > On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > > > ../../third_party/vulkan-validation- > > > layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:  > > > note: use

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-07-31 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > >> otherwise you'd have to pass one of the suggested flags to the >> compiler somehow. > > Aren't required gcc versions and/or flags supposed to be specified >

[gentoo-user] Re: chromium 60 build failure

2017-07-31 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: >> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5: >> note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to >> compile your code >>