On 16/06/14 20:02, Daniel Frey wrote:
On 06/16/2014 09:56 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Does someone know what causes the error? I got this when upgrading from
GCC 4.8.2 to 4.8.3:
Installing (1 of 1) sys-devel/gcc-4.8.3
* gcc-config: Could not locate 'x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.8.2' in
On 07/09/12 14:24, Tanstaafl wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my prior GCC around for a while, if not until the
next upgrade, just as something to fall back on if the current
On 2012-09-07, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
This always happens if the gcc your are upgrading to is in the same
slot as the previous one.
Well, I've been managing this gentoo server since I installed it over 8
On 10/21/2010 10:58 PM, Grant wrote:
I just upgraded from gcc-4.4.3-r2 to gcc-4.4.4-r2 and I'm wondering if
I really need to rebuild everything as it says in the guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
All libs of 4.4.3 are binary compatible with 4.4.4. There is no need to
On 10/21/2010 08:35 PM, Jarry wrote:
On 19. 10. 2010 22:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:57:18 +0200, Jarry wrote:
Especially when I have to repeat it with my 12 gentoo servers.
Sequentially, unfortunatally, as they share the same hardware...
Why not use --buildpkg the first
On 10/19/2010 09:57 PM, Jarry wrote:
On 19. 10. 2010 20:02, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 07:45:58PM +0200, Jarry wrote:
I just tried to upgrade gcc (stable amd64, from 4.4.3-r2
to 4.4.4-r2) following the procedure recommended in Gentoo
GCC Upgrade Guide:
emerge -uav
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 06:39:51 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote: SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:49:48 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote: SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:49:48 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote: SNIP
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks and
put it all back together again so that
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks and
put it all back together again so that
Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Valmor de Almeida wrote:
SNIP
So emerge -evp is useful to get those last inconsistencies out of the
system.
--
Valmor
You can add this option to help with those: --with-bdeps y I consider it
-D on steroids. I actually
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Valmor de Almeida wrote:
SNIP
So emerge -evp is useful to get those last inconsistencies out of the
system.
--
Valmor
You can add this option to help with those: --with-bdeps y I
Dale wrote:
Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
On Saturday 10 July 2010 02:57:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc to
the newer version
- gcc-config -l
[1]
On Monday 12 July 2010 10:18:48 zek...@gmail.com wrote:
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
On Saturday 10 July 2010 02:57:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc
to the
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
On Monday 12 July 2010 10:18:48 zek...@gmail.com wrote:
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
On Saturday 10 July 2010 02:57:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:02:23 -0500, Dale wrote:
assuming this all goes without trouble (will take a while), should I
unmerge version 4.3.4?
There's no reason to. Unless you don't need it anymore.
Or he doesn't like cruft or needs the drive space.
Is rebuilding the whole
On Saturday 10 July 2010 02:57:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc to
the newer version
- gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.4
[2]
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks and
put it all back together again so that not even the factory can notice...
Precisely... :-)
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks and
put it all back together again so that not even the factory
* Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and besides liking the smell of fresh baked 1 and 0's in the
morning emerge -e @world was an easy way to solve my libpng problem.
Woke up this morning to a freshly baked Gentoo machine.
Now we just need support for emerging fresh and hot coffee
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc to
the newer version
- gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.4
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.3 *
and I am trying to rebuild the whole system with
emerge -e
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc to
the newer version
- gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.4
[2]
Dale wrote:
[snip]
Is rebuilding the whole system needed for that upgrade tho?
Dale
:-) :-)
Thought it would be a good idea to have a consistent system; not sure
whether it is necessary.
Thanks for the replies.
--
Valmor
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc to
the newer version
-gcc-config -l
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded.
On 07/09/2010 07:45 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Dale wrote:
[snip]
Is rebuilding the whole system needed for that upgrade tho?
Dale
:-) :-)
Thought it would be a good idea to have a consistent system; not sure
whether it is necessary.
Thanks for the replies.
The only real need
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Dale wrote:
Cheese, I'm learning something. I already knew that it would not delete
files in /etc/ and now I know why. LOL I never put the two together
before you said that.
Well, the /etc thing is generally more due to CONFIG_PROTECT - it
won't delete files from /etc
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:15:09 -0500, Dale wrote:
So basically if I mess with a file and then unmerge the program it
belongs to, I have to remember which ones I messed with and delete them
myself?
Yes, because the file is no longer the file portage installed, so it has
no right to remove it.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:15:09 -0500, Dale wrote:
So basically if I mess with a file and then unmerge the program it
belongs to, I have to remember which ones I messed with and delete them
myself?
Yes, because the file is no longer the file portage installed, so
On Monday 11 September 2006 23:32, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:15:09 -0500, Dale wrote:
So basically if I mess with a file and then unmerge the program it
belongs to, I have to remember which ones I messed with and delete them
myself?
Yes, because the file is no longer the
Dale wrote:
Cheese, I'm learning something. I already knew that it would not delete
files in /etc/ and now I know why. LOL I never put the two together
before you said that.
Well, the /etc thing is generally more due to CONFIG_PROTECT - it won't
delete files from /etc regardless of whether
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I'm upgrading my gcc from 3.x to 4.x. I've done the gcc switching, and
now I'm
updating my system.
The recommended steps are:
# emerge -eav system
# emerge -eav world
While emerging my system I received a message suggesting I run
revdep-rebuild:
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
snip
I would run revdep-rebuild after the rebuild of
world, just to be sure.
snip
Cheers
Marc
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc
Dale schrieb:
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade. If you run it, you may want to post to make
sure it is making sense. After three
On Friday 08 September 2006 15:00, Dale wrote:
I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade.
It is bug #125728 [1]? Otherwise if it continues consider posting the output
of:
#
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Dale schrieb:
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade. If you run it, you may want to post to make
sure it is
On 9/8/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checking dynamic linking consistency...
broken /usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins/0/bankinfo/de.la (requires
/usr/lib/libaqbanking.la)
Since you don't have aqbanking installed anymore, just delete these
files, and probably the entire /usr/lib/qabanking
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:14:53 -0500, Dale wrote:
broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat.la)
broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavcodec.la)
broken /usr/lib/libqbanking.la (requires /usr/lib/libaqbanking.la)
broken
On 9/8/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So basically if these files don't belong to anything, I can safely
delete them?
Yep.
On the roach report, me sort of chicken to edit those files. Will it be
OK to let it stay like this and let the bug get fixed? It's been doing
this a while and I
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
I'm working on the list above. So far nothing belongs to anything.
Maybe I need a depclean on this thing. It is a 3 year old install if I
recall correctly.
This has nothing to do with depclean. Neils suggesting that the md5sums were
altered by
On Saturday 09 September 2006 05:33, Dale wrote:
What would be a good way of finding files that were not deleted when
something was upgraded/unmerged? I thought depclean was different from
what I wanted to say but it got the ball rolling.
Depclean is to remove packages that are no longer in
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 09 September 2006 05:33, Dale wrote:
What would be a good way of finding files that were not deleted when
something was upgraded/unmerged? I thought depclean was different from
what I wanted to say but it got the ball rolling.
Depclean is to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
At the end of that same quide there're some hints on most common errors.
So to just continue on with the recompile run:#emerge --resume --skipfirst.
But that will work only if no other emerge command was run in between.
Later you could investigate about this
46 matches
Mail list logo
