[gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-30 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Colquhoun writes: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:54:51 Harry Putnam wrote: >> Paul Hartman writes: >> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> >> I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to >> >> learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:58 on Friday 29 October 2010, Fatih Tümen did opine thusly: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 21:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih Tümen wrote: > >> I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the > >> packages

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-29 Thread Fatih Tümen
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 21:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih Tümen wrote: > >> I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the >> packages that need hal. But I think there is a third option here > > Packages that need hal won't have a hal use

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih Tümen wrote: > I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the > packages that need hal. But I think there is a third option here Packages that need hal won't have a hal use flag. -- Neil Bothwick Oxymoron: Reagan memoirs. signa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Philip Webb
101028 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Harry Putnam did opine thusly: >> Philip Webb writes: >>> From my notes, having done it on 2 desktops machines + 1 netbook : >>> To remove Hal : drop '-hal' flag, add 'udev' flag ; >> So no kind of hal flag in make.conf > or is `-hal' a typo that should be `drop

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Fatih Tümen
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:26, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 05:22 on Thursday 28 October 2010, Harry > Putnam did opine thusly: > >> Philip Webb writes: >> > 101027 Harry Putnam wrote: >> >> I wondered if there is some kind of guide to scrap hal. >> > >> > From my notes,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 05:22 on Thursday 28 October 2010, Harry Putnam did opine thusly: > Philip Webb writes: > > 101027 Harry Putnam wrote: > >> I wondered if there is some kind of guide to scrap hal. > > > > From my notes, having done it on 2 desktops machines + 1 netbook : > Ni

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Paul Colquhoun
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:54:51 Harry Putnam wrote: > Paul Hartman writes: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to > >> learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf to keep > >> using my huge desk

[gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Hartman writes: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to >> learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf to keep >> using my huge desktops I like to use.  For yrs I've >> used. >> >>    Subsec

[gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Philip Webb writes: > 101027 Harry Putnam wrote: >> I wondered if there is some kind of guide to scrap hal. > > From my notes, having done it on 2 desktops machines + 1 netbook : Nice .. many thanks but one question > > To remove Hal : drop '-hal' flag, add 'udev' flag ; So no kind of

[gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Philip Webb writes: > 101027 Harry Putnam wrote: >> I wondered if there is some kind of guide to scrap hal. > > From my notes, having done it on 2 desktops machines + 1 netbook : Nice .. many thanks but one question > > To remove Hal : drop '-hal' flag, add 'udev' flag ; So no kin