On 10/11/11 13:58, Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Sunday 09 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be plugins
Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said,
perl: enable the following plugins (written
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 08 October 2011 19:43:53 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I'm going to start a bug-filing campaign against packages like this
some day. The only description we ever get for use flag foo is
'enable support for foo', which doesn't tell you
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected
in a bad way by this move.
Comment here? The devs are
On Sunday 09 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be plugins
Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said,
perl: enable the following plugins (written in perl): tabs,
transparency, etc.
In
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected
in a bad way by this move.
Comment here? The devs are
AM USE=perl tells you squat, you don't even know what effect it will
AM have. You'd have to read the ebuild and the source to figure that out.
AM A MUCH better name is USE=tabs with a description like this Provide
AM multiple tabs, requires perl.
No, that is not a better name for the USE flag.
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:48:09 -0400
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
AM USE=perl tells you squat, you don't even know what effect it
AM will have. You'd have to read the ebuild and the source to figure
AM that out.
AM A MUCH better name is USE=tabs with a description like this
AM
On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be plugins
Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said, perl:
enable the following plugins (written in perl): tabs, transparency, etc.
In fact, that would be my favorite solution.
On Oct 10, 2011 2:01 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 10/09/11 13:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For rxvt, a suitable flag name would be plugins
Or if there were some package-specific documentation that said, perl:
enable the following plugins (written in perl): tabs,
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/08/11 13:43, Francesco Talamona wrote:
x11-terms/rxvt-unicode is one of the program I use the most, today
I lost the ability to have multiple tabs and almost panicked.
I found the solution to have back this essential feature:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 21:09:48 +0200
Francesco Talamona francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/08/11 13:43, Francesco Talamona wrote:
x11-terms/rxvt-unicode is one of the program I use the most, today
I lost the ability to have multiple
I second this!
On Sat Oct 8 12:23:57 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 21:09:48 +0200
Francesco Talamona francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/08/11 13:43, Francesco Talamona wrote:
x11-terms/rxvt-unicode is one of the
On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected in a
bad way by this move.
Comment here? The devs are still CCed even though it's closed:
13 matches
Mail list logo
