On 2010-04-17 6:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 6:06 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile
everything *but* gcc)?
Of course I meant:
emerge -e
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 6:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 6:06 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile
everything *but* gcc)?
Of course I meant:
On 4/18/10, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
You could try temporarily masking it:
#echo sys-devel/gcc /etc/portage/package.mask
Then updating:
#emerge -e system
Then removing the mask:
#sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask
I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc compiles.
not very nice, but will work without breaking anything.
Dang - I already started the emerge...
I'm surprised there's no easy way to do this... I guess just because you
don't
On 2010-04-18 11:54 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
On 4/18/10, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
You could try temporarily masking it:
#echo sys-devel/gcc /etc/portage/package.mask
Then updating:
#emerge -e system
Then removing the mask:
#sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask
I don't
On 2010-04-18 11:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc compiles.
not very nice, but will work without breaking anything.
Hmmm... clarification though... when you say 'kill something'... how
would I
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc compiles.
not very nice, but will work without breaking anything.
Dang - I already started the emerge...
You can still
On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc
compiles. not very nice, but will work without breaking
anything.
Dang - I
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 04:59:07PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Is there a way to emerge, say, system, but omit one package in it?
For example, I've already recompiled gcc 4.3.4 with itself... is there a
way to now do something like:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc
compiles. not very
On 04/18/10 11:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
Crap, doesn't look like this will work...
After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get:
emerge -pev world
snip
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/libc have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to
On 2010-04-18 1:11 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
On 04/18/10 11:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
Crap, doesn't look like this will work...
After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get:
emerge -pev world
snip
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/libc have been masked.
!!! One
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:00:40 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get:
emerge -pev world
snip
Total: 351 packages (351 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 5 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
[0] /usr/portage
[?] indicates that the source repository
On 2010-04-18 1:09 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
well... you could use --keep-going and kill
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 03:54:38PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 3:49 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 1:09 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400,
On 2010-04-18 3:57 PM, YoYo siska wrote:
Will etc-update still prompt for all necessary changes for config
files for *all* of the installs done, considering I did ctrl-c 3
times (glibc, and both gcc's)?
yes, if new config files got installed, etc-update will show them (I
think it uses 'find'
On 2010-04-18 1:58 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:00:40 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get:
emerge -pev world
snip
Total: 351 packages (351 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 5 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
[0] /usr/portage
On Sunday 18 April 2010 17:29:12 YoYo siska wrote:
You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it
starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge
--resume --skipfirst
that's what I usually do with openoffice and similar apps when I do a
quick update and
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:36:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I assume you aren't specifying --jobs=[2,3,4,...]. Very useful
embellishment of emerge: gets things done in half the time.
--jobs=2 doubles the number of ebuilds being merged, not the number of
cores in your processor :-O
It is
Is there a way to emerge, say, system, but omit one package in it?
For example, I've already recompiled gcc 4.3.4 with itself... is there a
way to now do something like:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile
everything *but* gcc)?
Its not a big deal, I'm just
On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile
everything *but* gcc)?
Of course I meant:
emerge -e system -gcc
On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile
everything *but* gcc)?
Of course I meant:
emerge -e system -gcc
You could try temporarily masking it:
#echo sys-devel/gcc
On 2010-04-17 6:06 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile
everything *but* gcc)?
Of course I meant:
emerge -e system -gcc
You could try temporarily
23 matches
Mail list logo
