[gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Eric S. Johansson
updated a couple of machines to 2005.1+ sometime in the past month. Everything went fine or so I thought. Had to reboot one of the machines today. It wouldn't boot. Everything started okay or so it seemed except eth0 wasn't present. The module was compiled in the kernel, the configuration

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Renat Golubchyk
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 Eric S. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did something go

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Renat Golubchyk wrote: On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 Eric S. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened?

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Willie Wong
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:34:25PM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: Renat Golubchyk wrote: On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 Eric S. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo

Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0

2005-10-24 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Willie Wong wrote: Is net.eth0 a symlink to net.lo? If not, remove net.eth0 and symlink it to net.lo. wasn't and did. now fighting with squirrelmail upgrade and apache ssl not fun day. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list