Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:50:23 +, White, Phil wrote: > As mentioned, I was careless with copying over /var from a previous > install. The problem wasn't with the world file, but with the db/pkg > lists. emerge -e did not immediately fix it. emerge -e @world would not have fixed it unless you

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On 8 March 2017 at 11:29, Stroller wrote: > > Could you `grep -i gcc /var/lib/portage/world*` please? > > A copy of the whole world file(s) would be great, in fact, ideally as > plain text attachments. > Hi Stroller, Thanks, (and apologies for the delay). World

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

> On 7 Mar 2017, at 16:14, White, Phil wrote: > > OK - talking this through is helping. I *have* done something strange here. > The currently installed version is 4.9.4 (from gcc --version), except that > portage believes that 5.4.0 is installed. Could you `grep -i gcc

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

White, Phil wrote: > On 7 March 2017 at 19:38, Neil Bothwick > wrote: > > > Please don't top post, it is disliked on this list. > > > Sorry - a consequence of moving away from a proper mail client, and on > to a web-based thing. > > > If

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On 07/03/2017 22:00, White, Phil wrote: > On 7 March 2017 at 19:38, Neil Bothwick > wrote: > > > Please don't top post, it is disliked on this list. > > > Sorry - a consequence of moving away from a proper mail client, and on > to a

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On 7 March 2017 at 19:38, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Please don't top post, it is disliked on this list. > Sorry - a consequence of moving away from a proper mail client, and on to a web-based thing. > If you copied over /var/db/pkg you have a rather confused and messed up >

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:14:26 +, White, Phil wrote: > Hi Neil, Please don't top post, it is disliked on this list. > > Well, this is a new install. > Used Stage3-i686-20170214.tar.bz2 > There is nothing in package.accept_keywords that is currently installed > (as far as I know - although it

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

Hi Neil, Well, this is a new install. Used Stage3-i686-20170214.tar.bz2 There is nothing in package.accept_keywords that is currently installed (as far as I know - although it is possible that I might have added ~x86 to gcc, although in this instance I don't believe that i did) I have installed

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:07:32 +, White, Phil wrote: > I have a new install of Gentoo. > emerge -uDpv --newuse @system results in a new slot for gcc, > *downgrading* the current version (from 5.4.0 to 4.9.4) > No other package is selected for merging. 4.9.4 is the latest stable. Are you running

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

Sorry Alan, that results in no extra information from emerge. Still only gcc listed for installation - and nothing else. -- Phil On 7 March 2017 at 15:08, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 07/03/2017 17:07, White, Phil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm sorry. This is probably a

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

On 07/03/2017 17:07, White, Phil wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry. This is probably a really simple question. > I have a new install of Gentoo. > emerge -uDpv --newuse @system results in a new slot for gcc, > *downgrading* the current version (from 5.4.0 to 4.9.4) > No other package is selected for

[gentoo-user] Emerge @system causing gcc downgrade

Hi, I'm sorry. This is probably a really simple question. I have a new install of Gentoo. emerge -uDpv --newuse @system results in a new slot for gcc, *downgrading* the current version (from 5.4.0 to 4.9.4) No other package is selected for merging. Why??? What command line can I give to show why

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday 30 August 2016 22:51:47 Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 15:30:51 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 13:38:13 J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:56:50 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 15:30:51 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 13:38:13 J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:56:50 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > You should elaborate more and be specific on what you

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On 30/08/2016 12:56, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: You should elaborate more and be specific on what you mean by "The reason is an intermittent series of apparently unrelated things going wrong." Here's one then: In KMail (yes, I know*) the folder

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 13:38:13 J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:56:50 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > You should elaborate more and be specific on what you mean by "The > > > reason is an intermittent series of apparently

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:56:50 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > You should elaborate more and be specific on what you mean by "The > > reason is an intermittent series of apparently unrelated things going > > wrong." > > Here's one then: In

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 11:56:50 I wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > You should elaborate more and be specific on what you mean by "The > > reason is an intermittent series of apparently unrelated things going > > wrong." > > Here's one then: In KMail (yes, I know)

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 12:06:43 Alan McKinnon wrote: > You should elaborate more and be specific on what you mean by "The > reason is an intermittent series of apparently unrelated things going > wrong." Here's one then: In KMail (yes, I know*) the folder list contains an item "trash" (ugh!),

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On 30/08/2016 11:25, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 00:07:53 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Don't forget that @system only lives in a context, and the context is a >> real computer. >> >> Out of context it's just a list of strings. In context, it's strings >> that means packages, with

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Tuesday 30 Aug 2016 00:07:53 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Don't forget that @system only lives in a context, and the context is a > real computer. > > Out of context it's just a list of strings. In context, it's strings > that means packages, with deps and everything else that needs to be > built

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On 29/08/2016 21:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:04:08 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I remember someone (Dale?) some time ago being dismayed at the large number of packages that would be installed by emerge @system. Now I see what he meant: on this box 401 of the 1103 installed

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @system

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:04:08 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I remember someone (Dale?) some time ago being dismayed at the large > number of packages that would be installed by emerge @system. > > Now I see what he meant: on this box 401 of the 1103 installed > packages. I'd like to construct a

[gentoo-user] emerge @system

Hello list, I remember someone (Dale?) some time ago being dismayed at the large number of packages that would be installed by emerge @system. Now I see what he meant: on this box 401 of the 1103 installed packages. I'd like to construct a set that would create a reliable basis for building

[gentoo-user] emerge - system error

checking size of long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (long double), 77 See `config.log' for more details. !!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.6-r4 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 939: Called src_compile glibc-2.3.6-r4.ebuild, line

[gentoo-user] Emerge system fails on libperl

Trying to do a new install on an x86. Got to the step emerge --emptytree system and it bombs on emerging libperl. Something about % not being in the target string. Does this sound familiar to someone, or do I need to poke around some more? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge system fails on libperl

Michael Haan wrote: Trying to do a new install on an x86. Got to the step emerge --emptytree system and it bombs on emerging libperl. Something about % not being in the target string. Does this sound familiar to someone, or do I need to poke around some more? Does it look anything like

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge system fails on libperl

On 6/21/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Haan wrote: Trying to do a new install on an x86. Got to the step emerge --emptytree system and it bombs on emerging libperl. Something about % not being in the target string. Does this sound familiar to someone, or do I need to