Peter Humphrey writes:
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
Because KDE is so weird all over the place.
Well I just hope
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 16:27:50 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
Wouldn't this particular topic be best answered by the dev's of said file
systems and
what, if any, fragmentation etc, could and can and will happen with the
different
arguments ie -m 0, etc.? All it is now between everyone discussing this here in
a Gentoo
list is more or less conjecture,
John wrote:
Wouldn't this particular topic be best answered by the dev's of said file
systems and
what, if any, fragmentation etc, could and can and will happen with the
different
arguments ie -m 0, etc.? All it is now between everyone discussing this here
in a Gentoo
list is more
Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
Because KDE is so weird all over the place.
I can't see any material difference between the two links.
Yes, there is none.
This doesn't happen here,
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
Because KDE is so weird all over the place.
Well I just hope the team get it sorted out
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage would
put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run emerge
world command.
I've seen lately that this no longer happens, portage updates
On Monday 27 February 2012 21:05:24 Mike Gilbert wrote:
Relevent commits:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=d3f7
04a425a50b5cfa997a25866929b30f1b7d0f
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=458
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:36:00 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with
some update to the tree pedantic old fart mode ON
What does co-coincides mean?
It's when two coincidences are mutually coincident.
That or something involving a
On Feb 24, 2012 4:08 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:36:00 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with
some update to the tree pedantic old fart mode ON
What does co-coincides mean?
It's when two
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:27:52 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Feb 24, 2012 4:08 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:36:00 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides
with some update to the
Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage would
put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run emerge
world command.
I've seen lately that this no longer happens, portage updates are any
old place in the list just like all other packages.
I'm wondering why
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:16:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage would
put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run emerge
world command.
I've seen lately that this no longer happens, portage updates are any
old place
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:24:17 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:16:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage
would put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run
emerge world command.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:48:59PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked:
I'm not worried about broken portage commits, I have
FEATURES=buildsyspkg enabled so as long as I have a working tar I'm
good to go with any fix.
Wait... isn't portage itself no longer in the system set?
W
--
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:07:46 +0100
Willie WY Wong wong...@member.ams.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:48:59PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon
squawked:
I'm not worried about broken portage commits, I have
FEATURES=buildsyspkg enabled so as long as I have a working tar
I'm good to
On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:48:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with some
update to the tree pedantic old fart mode ON
What does co-coincides mean? I know that various versions of English exist
out there, but this one has me foxed.
--
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:36:00 +
Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:48:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with
some update to the tree pedantic old fart mode ON
What does co-coincides mean?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:36:00AM +, Penguin Lover Peter Humphrey squawked:
On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:48:59 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with some
update to the tree pedantic old fart mode ON
What does co-coincides mean? I
19 matches
Mail list logo
