Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-10-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:20:52 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote: > I'm no expert by any stretch, I just noticed that it was acting > different and as illustrated, I could prove it. Perhaps I misunderstood > what --deep was for. I guess I thought it was the package and any > dependencies that NEEDED upgrad

RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-10-02 Thread Daevid Vincent
> Anyway, the portage-2.1.2 tracker bug [1] shows you the > differences between > portage-2.1.1 and the latest 2.1.2 prerelease. Also a comment > from zmedico > (the portage dev who is providing us with all of these new > features and > fixes) [2] clearly shows that the change is intended. W

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-10-01 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
Reordering for readability. Please don't toppost... On Monday 02 October 2006 05:14, Daevid Vincent wrote: > > From: Walter Dnes: [SNIP] > > WARN: postinst > > In portage-2.1.1, emerge --newuse is now sensitive to changes in IUSE. [SNIP] > ...and that has what to do with "emerge -Davu"? [SNIP] O

RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-10-01 Thread Daevid Vincent
eneral use this option only in combi- nation with the world or system target. > -Original Message- > From: Walter Dnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 8:21 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-30 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote > Something has changed recently with 'emerge'. Whenever I use the -D option, > which I am pretty much in the habbit of typing 'emerge -Dav' or 'emerge > -Davu world/system', I notice it pulling in more stuff than it should. It > never

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-29 Thread Graham Murray
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I belive you're seeing is that there have been new flags added or > removed from ebuilds and therefor there is need to rebuild a lot of > packages to make everything fall in line. For myself recently I saw a > lot of perl packages rebuilt because the 'minim

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 29 September 2006 01:04, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 17:53, Wolfgang Illmeyer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D > > pulling in more than it should these days?!': > > If I remember >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Alan
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote: > Something has changed recently with 'emerge'. Whenever I use the -D option, > which I am pretty much in the habbit of typing 'emerge -Dav' or 'emerge > -Davu world/system', I notice it pulling in more stuff than it should. It > never

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/28/06, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But when I do emerge -Dav sys-apps/baselayout It pulls in baselayout, python, perl, openssl (clearly the last two are not needed or related to baselayout) Not true at all. With the right USE flags, baselayout depends on coreutils, which

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 29 September 2006 01:32, Daevid Vincent wrote: > > Portage is developing quite fast at the moment so it is quite > > possible that you have discovered some change in behaviour (either due to > > a bug or due to permanent changes) but I don't see anything wrong in this > > mail... What mak

RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Daevid Vincent
> -Original Message- > Portage is developing quite fast at the moment so it is quite > possible that > you have discovered some change in behaviour (either due to a > bug or due to > permanent changes) but I don't see anything wrong in this > mail... What makes > you think it pulls in

RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Daevid Vincent
006 3:53 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it > should these days?! > > Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 23:15 schrieb Daevid Vincent: > > Something has changed recently with 'emerge'. Whenever I > use th

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Thursday 28 September 2006 17:53, Wolfgang Illmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!': > If I remember > correctly, -D usually meant "do not downgrade". That was -U (--upgrade-only

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Wolfgang Illmeyer
Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 23:15 schrieb Daevid Vincent: > Something has changed recently with 'emerge'. Whenever I use the -D option, > which I am pretty much in the habbit of typing 'emerge -Dav' or 'emerge > -Davu world/system', I notice it pulling in more stuff than it should. It > never

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it should these days?!

2006-09-28 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 28 September 2006 23:15, Daevid Vincent wrote: > Something has changed recently with 'emerge'. Whenever I use the -D option, > which I am pretty much in the habbit of typing 'emerge -Dav' or 'emerge > -Davu world/system', I notice it pulling in more stuff than it should. It > never acte