Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-08 Thread Ptitjack
JimD a gentiment tapote: However, I do like being able to customize my system and Gentoo gives me a very nice way to do that. The only current issue I with Gentoo that I want to address is a recovery option. I will probably post a thread on that topic soon. I have about 1GB in

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-08 Thread JimD
Ptitjack wrote: Hi, I backup and restore my Gentoo system with Partimage and the SysRescueCd live CD. It is very easy to use and it takes about 30 minutes to restore my system (/ , usr/, boot and home). http://www.sysresccd.org/Main_Page Regards --- Ptitjack -- Thanks. I will check

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-07 Thread Robert Persson
In my recent experience the frequent changes to the xorg7 versions in portage are getting pretty hairy. I have been constantly adding things to package.keywords and package.unmask every time I do a world upgrade. And then it got 1000 times worse... Yesterday I did an emerge -u world which

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-07 Thread JimD
Robert Persson wrote: Stick with 6.8.2 for the time being. 7 works a little better with wine, but overall it is the kind of pain in the arse that shoots most of the way back up your digestive tract. Robert Or stick with xorg-7 and don't do all the little updates? If i have a working

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-07 Thread Robert Persson
On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:31 JimD was like: Or stick with xorg-7 and don't do all the little updates?  If i have a working package, I won't do an update unless the *package* changes.  For example I wouldn't update a working foo-1.0-r1 to foo-1.0-r2.  I would (probably) do an update to foo-1.0.1

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-07 Thread JimD
Robert Persson wrote: On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:31 JimD was like: Or stick with xorg-7 and don't do all the little updates? If i have a working package, I won't do an update unless the *package* changes. For example I wouldn't update a working foo-1.0-r1 to foo-1.0-r2. I would (probably) do

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-07 Thread Robert Persson
On Sunday 07 May 2006 22:07 Philip Webb was like: glsa-check -l | grep \[N\] Thanks for that. That will be handy. On the other hand it failed to report the security hole that is supposed to have been the reason for the xorg-server update that caused me all that grief earlier today, which is

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-05 Thread Allan Spagnol Comar
thanks for the explanation. On 5/5/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/4/06, Allan Spagnol Comar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I am instaling a new gentoo box with x86, and I have a doubt about instaling xorg, I know that 7.0 is masked but almost getting stable, and I

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-05 Thread Mick
On 05/05/06, Allan Spagnol Comar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the explanation. On 5/5/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/4/06, Allan Spagnol Comar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if not, wait for it to get stable, this MAY save you some trouble. The real question here is: If

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 7.0 or 6.8. What of then is better ?

2006-05-04 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 5/4/06, Allan Spagnol Comar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I am instaling a new gentoo box with x86, and I have a doubt about instaling xorg, I know that 7.0 is masked but almost getting stable, and I know that migrating from one another is a little traumatic, so here is my question, I