Alex Schuster [10-09-12 04:13]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
>
> > I think there is some misunderstanding:
> >
> > Before migration to 64bit:
> >
> > /dev/sda3 is mounted on / and contains the 32bit Gentoo
> >
> > /dev/sda10 is mounted on /home/mcc/migration and will contain the
> > stuff of
> What happens if portage builds a 'static' package that links against a
> library
> that was installed without the 'static-libs' useflag being set?
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/introduction.html writes:
"DL libraries aren't really a different kind of library format (both
static an
On 09/11/2010 11:24 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 11 September 2010 18:50:04 Mick wrote:
Deselect that which is deprecated and will be removed soon
I hope it won't. I have one box whose drives the new drivers cannot
detect - at least, nothing I've tried has worked so far.
That seems
On 09/11/2010 01:52 PM, walt wrote:
I don't know how portage chooses between static and dynamic libs while building
a package.
Aha! Grepping through /usr/portage/eclass/* for 'static' taught me something:
xorg-2.eclass: myopts+=" $(use_enable static-libs static)"
So there i
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:06:04 +0100 Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Saturday 11 September 2010 23:03:14 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
>
> > Makes sense?
>
> Not convinced. Sorry.
The Merriam-Webster gives this definition of "potential":
"existing in possibility : capable of development into actuality"
whic
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:47 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
> >> My point was, if the sources are say in the user group, then any user
> >> can edit them? Right now, they are in the root group and owned my root
> >> which for security reasons is a good idea. That
On Saturday 11 September 2010 23:03:14 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> Makes sense?
Not convinced. Sorry.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On Saturday 11 September 2010 22:57:12 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 11 September 2010 21:15:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:24 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
> >
> > Peter Humphrey did opine thus:
> > > On Saturday 11 September 2010 18:50:04 Mick wrote:
> > >
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2010 17:13:44 Maciej Grela wrote:
> > 2010/9/10 Paul Hartman
> >
> >:
> > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Maciej Grela
> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Is there any way to make emerge (wget) correctly behave when it trie
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:05:22 +0100
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 11 September 2010 21:28:13 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
>
> > This was actually a potential risk once upon a time:
>
> Sorry to drift from the topic, but would somebody please explain to me
> what a potential risk is? How does it d
On Saturday 11 September 2010 21:28:13 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> This was actually a potential risk once upon a time:
Sorry to drift from the topic, but would somebody please explain to me
what a potential risk is? How does it differ from a risk?
(Not getting at you, Etaoin; the world is just full
On Saturday 11 September 2010 21:15:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 20:24 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
> Peter Humphrey did opine thus:
> > On Saturday 11 September 2010 18:50:04 Mick wrote:
> > > Deselect that which is deprecated and will be removed soon
> >
> > I hope
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:49 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Gu
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:01 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
> On 09/11/2010 11:49 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2010 11:35 PM, Dale wrote:
> >>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
> I think there is some misunderstanding:
>
> Before migration to 64bit:
>
> /dev/sda3 is mounted on / and contains the 32bit Gentoo
>
> /dev/sda10 is mounted on /home/mcc/migration and will contain the
> stuff of the 64bit Gentoo
>
> After migration I will *not* mo
On 09/11/2010 11:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:34 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
On 09/11/2010 11:18 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
Albert
Hopkins did opine thus
On 09/11/2010 11:49 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
few months ag
On 09/11/2010 02:13 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
synce few days, I have a message of portage suggestiung me to use the "static-
libs" USE flag for media-libs/jpeg-6b.
What may be the consequence ? Please be gentle with explaining this sorte of
things, as I have not the knowledges to understand the
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:34 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
> On 09/11/2010 11:18 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
> > Albert
> >
> > Hopkins did opine thusly:
> >> On Sat, 2010-09-11 at
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:28 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Etaoin
Shrdlu did opine thusly:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:35:58 -0500 Dale wrote:
> > If they are accessible by a user, couldn't a user then edit or add
> > something that would then cause a security problem? If they can edit
>
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:35:58 -0500 Dale wrote:
> If they are accessible by a user, couldn't a user then edit or add
> something that would then cause a security problem? If they can edit
> them and no one know it, then root comes along and builds a shiney new
> kernel with a really nice secur
On 09/11/2010 11:35 PM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010,
Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author
wrot
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author
wrote we shouldn't do kernel op
On 09/11/2010 11:18 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author
wrote we shouldn'
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:46 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Albert
Hopkins did opine thusly:
> On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author
> > wrote we shouldn't do kernel operations (config and bui
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:24 on Saturday 11 September 2010, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
> On Saturday 11 September 2010 18:50:04 Mick wrote:
> > Deselect that which is deprecated and will be removed soon
>
> I hope it won't. I have one box whose drives the new drivers cannot
> dete
Mark Knecht [10-09-11 20:40]:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:23 AM, wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Why not mount /dev/sda10 as root and be done with it.? No need to move
> >> anything.
> >
> > ...because data access at the outer partitions are faster than those
> > in the middle...
> >
>
> OK, assuming it
On Saturday 11 September 2010 18:50:04 Mick wrote:
> Deselect that which is deprecated and will be removed soon
I hope it won't. I have one box whose drives the new drivers cannot
detect - at least, nothing I've tried has worked so far.
> and select the appropriate SCSI drivers for your drives.
Selon Mick :
> On Saturday 11 September 2010 17:01:29 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > Selon Stéphane Guedon :
> > > Le Monday 06 September 2010 17:11:17, alain.didierj...@free.fr a écrit :
> > > > Selon Stroller :
> > > > > On 6 Sep 2010, at 09:55, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > > > >
Mick wrote:
> > > If you call cdrecord (release 3.00):
> > > cdrecord -scanbus
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > cdrecord -checkdrive
> > >
> > > and it finds a drive, then there is a bug in k3b.
> >
> > al...@isba ~ $ cdrecord --checkdrive
> > Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (x86_64-unknown-li
On 09/11/2010 11:24 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell, and the author wrote we
shouldn't do kernel operations (config and build) as root.
Is sudo (or kdesudo ?) a good replacement to that ?
Kdesudo works good to have xconfig, which is more comfortable
On Saturday 11 September 2010 17:01:29 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> Selon Stéphane Guedon :
> > Le Monday 06 September 2010 17:11:17, alain.didierj...@free.fr a écrit :
> > > Selon Stroller :
> > > > On 6 Sep 2010, at 09:55, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > > > For some unknown reason, m
On Saturday 11 September 2010 16:57:18 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> Selon Joerg Schilling :
> > alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > For some unknown reason, my DVD r/w device is not detected as such by
> > > udev: I can mount /dev/hda and read a data CD, but /dev/cdrom is not
> > > created a
On Thursday 13 May 2010 11:08:48 you wrote:
> In the last two weeks I renewed an SSL certificate from Comodo for
> email usage. This time round Kleopatra is having problems with
> recognising the passphrase I use.
>
> I partially suspect a gnupg bug here probably relating to mime
> characters, bu
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:23 AM, wrote:
>>
>> Why not mount /dev/sda10 as root and be done with it.? No need to move
>> anything.
>
> ...because data access at the outer partitions are faster than those
> in the middle...
>
OK, assuming it's really measurable in real life, but I'll point out
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Extremely bad idea. It's no wonder something did break. You can't just
"silentoldconfig" between kernel versions and expect it to always work. At
least "oldconfig" would catch new options (which might be options replacing
old ones.)
silentoldc
Selon Stéphane Guedon :
> Le Monday 06 September 2010 17:11:17, alain.didierj...@free.fr a écrit :
> > Selon Stroller :
> > > On 6 Sep 2010, at 09:55, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > > For some unknown reason, my DVD r/w device is not detected as such
> > > > by udev:
> > > > I can mount /d
Selon Joerg Schilling :
> alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
>
> >
> > For some unknown reason, my DVD r/w device is not detected as such by udev:
> > I can mount /dev/hda and read a data CD, but /dev/cdrom is not created at
> boot
> > time and k3b returns
> > " No optical drive found.
> > K3b did no
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 05:46 -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> In a perfect, tidy world we'd all do that. This world, however does
> not
> exist. Even portage, by default does configure and make as root
> (albeit
> in a sandbox so it is safe(r).
I suppose one could compile the kernel sources as roo
Mark Knecht [10-09-11 17:08]:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:19 AM, wrote:
>
> > I think there is some misunderstanding:
> >
> > Before migration to 64bit:
> >
> > /dev/sda3 is mounted on / and contains the 32bit Gentoo
> >
> > /dev/sda10 is mounted on /home/mcc/migration and will contain the
> >
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:19 AM, wrote:
> I think there is some misunderstanding:
>
> Before migration to 64bit:
>
> /dev/sda3 is mounted on / and contains the 32bit Gentoo
>
> /dev/sda10 is mounted on /home/mcc/migration and will contain the
> stuff of the 64bit Gentoo
>
> After migration I wil
On Saturday 11 September 2010, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> Le Saturday 11 September 2010 11:46:59, Albert Hopkins a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > > few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author
> > > wrote we shouldn't do kernel ope
On 11 Sep 2010, at 07:38, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
...
AFAICT, you didn't say if you read the earlier thread cited by
Stroller:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/216290
Sure did. didn't help much.
No, it wouldn't if you didn't bother to read it or actually follow
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:08:49 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> I would mount -o bind / /mnt/binroot and cp -a or
> something /mnt/bindroot to the 32bit-/, so you don't copy things
> as /proc and /dev as well.
Or use the -x option with cp, although I prefer to use rsync -ax for this
type of thing.
-
Alex Schuster [10-09-11 12:08]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
>
> > I plan to "convert" (==reinstall) my system to be 64bit.
> > Since I have an already working and configure 32bit Gentoo-
> > system I would like to do the migration as follows:
> >
> > Create another / partition somwhere on my h
Le Monday 06 September 2010 17:11:17, alain.didierj...@free.fr a écrit :
> Selon Stroller :
> > On 6 Sep 2010, at 09:55, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> > > For some unknown reason, my DVD r/w device is not detected as such
> > > by udev:
> > > I can mount /dev/hda and read a data CD, ...
> >
>
Le Saturday 11 September 2010 11:46:59, Albert Hopkins a écrit :
> On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author
> > wrote we shouldn't do kernel operations (config and build) as root.
>
> I call bullsh*t. I'v
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
> I plan to "convert" (==reinstall) my system to be 64bit.
> Since I have an already working and configure 32bit Gentoo-
> system I would like to do the migration as follows:
>
> Create another / partition somwhere on my harddisk
> Install/Create a new 64bit Gentoo roo
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:24 +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell(sic), and the author wrote
> we
> shouldn't do kernel operations (config and build) as root.
I call bullsh*t. I've been compiling kernels for 17 years and for the
most part have done i
synce few days, I have a message of portage suggestiung me to use the "static-
libs" USE flag for media-libs/jpeg-6b.
What may be the consequence ? Please be gentle with explaining this sorte of
things, as I have not the knowledges to understand the full compile process,
otherwise I am a little
On Saturday 11 September 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the command "sensors" (lm_sensor) I can read out the
> temperatures/voltages of my mobo/cpu:
>
> atk0110-acpi-0
> Adapter: ACPI interface
> Vcore Voltage: +1.35 V (min = +0.80 V, max = +1.60 V)
>
few months ago, I read linux kernel in a nutschell, and the author wrote we
shouldn't do kernel operations (config and build) as root.
Is sudo (or kdesudo ?) a good replacement to that ?
Kdesudo works good to have xconfig, which is more comfortable that menuconfig.
But is it a good manner of ma
Hi,
I plan to "convert" (==reinstall) my system to be 64bit.
Since I have an already working and configure 32bit Gentoo-
system I would like to do the migration as follows:
Create another / partition somwhere on my harddisk
Install/Create a new 64bit Gentoo root there.
If everything works fine:
On Friday 10 September 2010 17:13:44 Maciej Grela wrote:
> 2010/9/10 Paul Hartman :
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Maciej Grela
wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there any way to make emerge (wget) correctly behave when it tries
> >> to download a non-existing file from FTP
> >> in a network us
On Saturday 11 September 2010 07:57:32 you wrote:
> I just compiled and installed gentoo 2.6.35-r4 on an x86 machine and it
> failed miserably on boot up. As this kernel configuration of mine is not
> materially different to the 2.6.34 version, I am wondering if it is
> suffering from some congeni
56 matches
Mail list logo