On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:17, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On 4/9/2011 4:57 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 17:02:14 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
>>
If you're using PVSCSI, go into SCSI& RAID, then SCSI Low Level
Driver, then select VMware PVSCSI as built-in, not module.
Hi all,
Has anyone run into an issue where the kernel is not detecting devices? The
issue does not show up in 2.6.37 on amd64 testing branch. I just got done
re-emerging world to rule out any hidden surprises. Any ideas?
TIA,
James Wall
On 10/4/2011, at 2:50pm, Mark Knecht wrote:
> ... loses 1 drive and
> then, while in the process of fixing the RAID, loses a second drive.
> Most of us (myself included) buy identical drives all at the same time
> from the same vendor. This means all the drives were likely from the
> same manufact
On 4/9/2011 4:57 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 17:02:14 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
If you're using PVSCSI, go into SCSI& RAID, then SCSI Low Level
Driver, then select VMware PVSCSI as built-in, not module.
Do you know which one workstation uses? AFAICT there's no option to
choo
On 4/9/2011 3:02 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
I had a working .config. Unfortunately, I left it at office.
The main 'trap' usually would be the SCSI Driver.
If you're using PVSCSI, go into SCSI & RAID, then SCSI
Low Level
Driver, then select VMware PVSCSI as built-in, not module.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:32 on Monday 11 April 2011, Mark Shields
> did opine thusly:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:28 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Dale did
> > >
>
> The main 'trap' usually would be the SCSI Driver.
>
> If you're using PVSCSI, go into SCSI & RAID, then SCSI Low Level
> Driver, then select VMware PVSCSI as built-in, not module.
>
> If you're using LSI Logic, select Fusion MPT instead.
>
Thanks - i'd missed some of the MPT options.
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:32 on Monday 11 April 2011, Mark Shields
did opine thusly:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:28 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Dale did
> > opine
> >
> > thusly:
> > > > That was it! I've now got su-abil
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 16:28 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Dale did
> opine
> thusly:
>
> > > That was it! I've now got su-ability from that normal user.
> > >
> > > Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:11 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Alan
> Mackenzie
> did opine thusly:
>
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > My new(ish) amd64 system has two 1TB HDDs in a (software) RAID1, and
> > practically the entire system is under an L
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:11 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Alan Mackenzie
did opine thusly:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> My new(ish) amd64 system has two 1TB HDDs in a (software) RAID1, and
> practically the entire system is under an LVM2.
>
> I rather unwisely made this addition to the startup stuff:
Hi, Gentoo.
My new(ish) amd64 system has two 1TB HDDs in a (software) RAID1, and
practically the entire system is under an LVM2.
I rather unwisely made this addition to the startup stuff:
ls -s /usr/bin/svscanboot /etc/init.d/
rc-update add svscanboot default
, and now the box hangs dur
Hi list,
I have this in my procmailrc:
:0 Whc: $HOME/Mail/.msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 $HOME/Mail/.msgid.cache
:0 a:
$MAILDIR/duplicates/
This is situated after a virus-check and before all other filters.
But nothing duplicates is being catched, all they are falling into main
folders.
What
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:52:39 +0530, Yohan Pereira wrote:
> > Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
> > wheel.
>
> oh thats because the wheel was invented after the previous debian
> release :D.
ROTFL
--
Neil Bothwick
Time is an illusion but never so much as w
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:28 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
That was it! I've now got su-ability from that normal user.
Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
wheel.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Yann
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:28 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> > That was it! I've now got su-ability from that normal user.
> >
> > Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
> > wheel.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> Best regards,
> >> Yann
>
> I
> Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
> wheel.
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/su-invocation.html
Bottom section.
On Sunday 10 Apr 2011 07:58:21 PM Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
> wheel.
oh thats because the wheel was invented after the previous debian release :D.
--
- Yohan Pereira
"A man can do as he will, but not will as he will" - Schopenh
That was it! I've now got su-ability from that normal user.
Funny, though, on my (very) old Debian system I don't seem to have a
wheel.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Yann
I think that is a Gentoo thing. It does add some security if you don't
want a user, like maybe some little kid
Peter Humphrey wrote:
I'm just speculating at the moment, from a dabbler's point of view; what
benefits
would accrue from switching from RAID-1 to RAID-5 or above? And, in particular,
what are the comparative virtues of the Samsung disks?
I have one 750Gb Samsung drive that I have had at
On Sunday 10 April 2011 14:50:59 Mark Knecht wrote:
[...]
More useful info - thanks to you too.
> As for hardware RAID the risk I hear about there is that if the
> controller itself fails then you need an identical backup controller
> or you risk the possibility that you won't be able to recover
Hi, Yann,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 03:19:15PM +0200, Yann Ormanns wrote:
> Subject: [gentoo-user] su doesn't work for me.
> From: Alan Mackenzie
> To: Yann Ormanns
> Date: 2011-04-10 15:17 (+)
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > When, as a normal user, I type "su", followed, when prompted, by the
> > root
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Saturday 09 April 2011 22:01:18 Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> Are you running a RAID?
>
> Yes; mdadm RAID-1, with LVM on top, as in the Gentoo how-to:
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml
>
>> Are you looking fo
On Sunday 10 April 2011 12:53:39 Stroller wrote:
> On 10/4/2011, at 8:50am, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > ...
> > I'm just speculating at the moment, from a dabbler's point of view; what
> > benefits would accrue from switching from RAID-1 to RAID-5 or above?
> > And, in particular, what are the compar
Hello Guys,
i do need some WebGUI for some Users. But the only thing i found was
webmin, witch i do not like to install.
Anyone some ideas?
Greetings Akendo
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:19 on Sunday 10 April 2011, Yann Ormanns
did opine thusly:
> Subject: [gentoo-user] su doesn't work for me.
> From: Alan Mackenzie
> To: Yann Ormanns
> Date: 2011-04-10 15:17 (+)
>
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > When, as a normal user, I type "su", followed, wh
Subject: [gentoo-user] su doesn't work for me.
From: Alan Mackenzie
To: Yann Ormanns
Date: 2011-04-10 15:17 (+)
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> When, as a normal user, I type "su", followed, when prompted, by the
> root password, I get the following error message:
>
> su: Permission denied
>
> . The
4/10/2011, "Alan Mackenzie" вы писали:
>Hi, Gentoo.
>
>When, as a normal user, I type "su", followed, when prompted, by the
>root password, I get the following error message:
>
>su: Permission denied
>
>. The return code is 1. I can't glean anything useful from the man
>page.
>
>Would someb
Hi, Gentoo.
When, as a normal user, I type "su", followed, when prompted, by the
root password, I get the following error message:
su: Permission denied
. The return code is 1. I can't glean anything useful from the man
page.
Would somebody please tell me what I'm missing.
Many thanks!
On 10/4/2011, at 8:50am, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> ...
> I'm just speculating at the moment, from a dabbler's point of view; what
> benefits
> would accrue from switching from RAID-1 to RAID-5 or above? And, in
> particular,
> what are the comparative virtues of the Samsung disks?
In your previ
On Saturday 09 April 2011 22:01:18 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Are you running a RAID?
Yes; mdadm RAID-1, with LVM on top, as in the Gentoo how-to:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml
> Are you looking for a little redundancy or a lot of redundancy?
I'm just speculating
31 matches
Mail list logo
