On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:27:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
> From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
> system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
> ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
> thing is, I use googles DNS serv
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 03:18:47 Adam Carter wrote:
> > Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
> >
> > Test with IPv6 DNS record
> > bad (0.261s)
>
> Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
> transport.
>
> /home/adam$ host -t www.googl
>
> Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
>
> Test with IPv6 DNS record
> bad (0.261s)
>
Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
transport.
/home/adam$ host -t www.google.com
www.google.com is an alias for www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system.
I complained about KDE stuff being in the system set lo
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I u
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I use googles DN
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
>> it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system.
>
> I complained about KDE stuff being in the system set long ago. It is
> because of USE
Mark Knecht wrote:
That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system. Prior to
switching to that profile I think @system as about 150 packages. Today
it's 389:
2stable ~ # emerge -epv @system
These are the packages tha
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:39 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
> opine thusly:
>
>> I have no problem with saying someone needs to understand what less
>> does. less isn't important. It's just the example at hand today. The
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:39:34 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> What I didn't like about this issue popping up yesterday is that it
>> altered the idea that average users never touch anything in @system.
>> Iin fact, TTBOMK I've never in 11 or 1
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:03 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Walter
> > Dnes
> >
> > did opine thusly:
> >> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
> >>
> >
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Walter Dnes
did opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed
Alan McKinnon wrote:
OK, now we're tracking.
In the specific case of less, the answer is self-evident - it isn't needed. A
dev would just know that. More likely, he would assume he knows that.
In the general case, they suck their thumbs and guess. Some think more than
others before they guess,
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Walter Dnes
did opine thusly:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
>
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > > Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Abhishek Gupta
wrote:
> Hello
>
> We need to setup a local repository for Gentoo, to serve the needs of our
> Academic institution IIT Delhi, India. Please tell me where can we request
> the access to the master repository for setting up the Gentoo repository in
> o
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:39:34 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>What I didn't like about this issue popping up yesterday is that it
> altered the idea that average users never touch anything in @system.
> Iin fact, TTBOMK I've never in 11 or 12 years of running Gentoo ever
> done an emerge -C on a @sys
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:38AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
> > depclean handling. It now shows this:
> >
> > !!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
> >
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:39 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
>I have no problem with saying someone needs to understand what less
> does. less isn't important. It's just the example at hand today. The
> 'problem' that I'm trying to get closer to answering is ho
Hello
We need to setup a local repository for Gentoo, to serve the needs of our
Academic institution IIT Delhi, India. Please tell me where can we request
the access to the master repository for setting up the Gentoo repository in
our institution.
--
Abhishek
3rd Year, CSE, IIT Delhi
http://abhis
On 06/08/2011 12:17 AM, Matt Harrison wrote:
[...]
Well I eventually managed to get the vmwgfx gallium driver to compile,
but I get an undefined symbol when trying to load it with xorg. I'll
give up with it now unless anyone else has an idea. It was a nice
thought that I might get to see the powe
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:51 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
> opine thusly:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> #370295
>> >
>> > Zac responded (comment #21) to my post in that bug with qu
On 07/06/2011 21:40, Matt Harrison wrote:
On 07/06/2011 20:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the lat
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:51 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
> >> #370295
> >
> > Zac responded (comment #21) to my post in that bug with quite a
> > well-reasoned rationale. It makes interesting readin
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> #370295
>
> Zac responded (comment #21) to my post in that bug with quite a well-reasoned
> rationale. It makes interesting reading.
It was a good response.
One question left hanging for me goes like this:
I understand nano is a choice
On 07/06/2011 20:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:36 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Alan McKinnon
did opine thusly:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:54 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Neil
> Bothwick
>
> did opine thusly:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:10:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > !!! 'app-editors/nano' is part o
On 07/06/2011 20:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4
On 06/07/2011 09:43 PM, Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4 is vastly improved from last time, extremely r
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Matt Harrison
> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work reasons,
>> but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to see how the
>> latest DMs are
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Matt Harrison
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work reasons,
> but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to see how the
> latest DMs are coming along.
>
> The current KDE4 is vastly improved from las
Hi list,
I have to run windows most of the time on my main desktop for work
reasons, but every now and then I install a gentoo guest on vmware to
see how the latest DMs are coming along.
The current KDE4 is vastly improved from last time, extremely responsive
and everything is really nice...
Helmut Jarausch schrieb am 07.06.2011 17:36:
> When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
> it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2
>
> The udisks' ebuild contains
>> =sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
>
> sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag
But sys-fs/udev-168-r2 has an extra use flag
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper
> use flag.
>
> But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages?
parted 3.0 is now masked, it broke gparted and others
# Jeroen Roovers (5 Jun 2011)
# Masked until
Hi,
I'm puzzled again by portage's logic.
When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2 and
sys-block/parted from 3.0 to 2.4
The udisks' ebuild contains
>=sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
>=sys-block/parted-1.8.8[device-mapper]
sys-fs/udev hasn't an '
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
> depclean handling. It now shows this:
>
> !!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
> !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.
>
I saw the same thin
* Alan McKinnon [110607 04:42]:
> Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
> depclean handling. It now shows this:
>
> !!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> sys-apps/less
> selected: 443
>protected: none
> omitted: none
>
>
> Changelog doesn't say much about this. I have nano, vim, more and less
> installed and vim is in world. I really don't feel like adding the oth
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:54 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:10:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > !!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system
> > profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your
> > system.
> >
> > !!! 'sys-apps/less'
* kashani [110606 19:37]:
> On 6/6/2011 4:31 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 01:01 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, James did
> > opine
> > thusly:
> >
> >> Ju want closet commando action? Check out some of my old
> >> college buddies from Alaska:
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube
Hello, Alan.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:49:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 20:32 on Monday 06 June 2011, Alan Mackenzie
> did opine thusly:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> > unsubscribing actually, mainly so
Hi, James.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:56:49PM +, James wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie muc.de> writes:
> > Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> Well, you can withdraw from the volume of mail
> but using gmane to interface to the list:
> gmane.org
> Just use an interface
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:10:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> !!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system
> profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your
> system.
> !!! 'sys-apps/less' is part of your system
> profile. !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your
> system.
> Anyone else seeing
Hi, Indi.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:15:14PM -0400, Indi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:32:11PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> > unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
> > develo
Hi, David.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:47:37PM -0400, David Relson wrote:
> Long live emacs !
> emacs is an essential part of my personal toolkit. I've been using it
> since 1996. For 11 yrs before that I used epsilon - an editor
> with much the same keymappings.
Wow! I started in about 1997
Hi, Bill.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:11:57PM -0700, Bill Longman wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 11:32 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> > unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
> > developer; the n
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.
app-editors/nano
selected: 2.3.1
protected: none
On Monday 06 June 2011 16:11:57 Bill Longman wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 11:32 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> > unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
> > developer; the number of emails o
Latest portage-2.2.0_alpha38 has changed something with system set and
depclean handling. It now shows this:
!!! 'app-editors/nano' is part of your system profile.
Thanks Dale. Will try tonight when I get home. After using Gentoo for a number
of years you get used to doing things a certain. These mailing lists really
help expand knowledge. Regards
JDM
-Original Message-
From: Dale
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:22:27
To:
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.g
Dale wrote:
JDM wrote:
When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 "init 1" seems to work as I
would expect. When I "init 3" applications hang, I have to keep
hitting return to get any progress. Usually I end up rebooting as X
won't start.
Question - should I be using init to change runlevels or is
JDM wrote:
When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 "init 1" seems to work as I would expect. When I
"init 3" applications hang, I have to keep hitting return to get any progress. Usually I
end up rebooting as X won't start.
Question - should I be using init to change runlevels or is there a bette
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:55 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Bill Longman wrote:
> > On 06/06/2011 11:32 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >> Hi, Gentoo.
> >>
> >> Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> >> unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:20 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> On Monday 06 Jun 2011 23:44:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 00:08 on Tuesday 07 June 2011, Mick did
> > opine
> >
> > thusly:
> > > I'm not sure I understand why this happens:
> >
On Monday 06 June 2011 11:55:07 Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-06 11:16 AM, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> >> Not idea, I'll grant you, but it isn't *that* hard to do...
> >
> > If you know the different locations to change it AND realize you need to
> > restart the application for changes like these to
54 matches
Mail list logo
