On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:43:46AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote
(app-admin/logrotate-3.7.9-r2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
app-admin/logrotate required by (net-proxy/squid-3.1.8::gentoo, installed)
app-admin/logrotate required by @selected
One more question... when you ran emerge --sync, did you see a
message telling you to update portage immediately? When you see that
message, do it right away before updating anything else.
--
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:34, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
One more question... when you ran emerge --sync, did you see a
message telling you to update portage immediately? When you see that
message, do it right away before updating anything else.
--
Walter Dnes
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:39, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:34, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
One more question... when you ran emerge --sync, did you see a
message telling you to update portage immediately? When you see that
message, do it
Okay, reading up [1] [2], it seems I have to first upgrade logrotate to = 3.8.0
[1] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-apps/portage
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374287
When I return from my late-lunch, I'll try that.
Unless I'm not supposed to do that.
Rgds,
On 2011-07-28,
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 17:18:19 James Wall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a update. Let's see what folks think about this situation. I
mentioned in another thread that I did a from scratch kernel. It was a
.35 version. It seemed to
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 16:35:13 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:52:53 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I wonder how effective tmpfs is for PORTAGE_TMPDIR as the builds
that need a lot of disk space can often require a fair bit of
memory too, and tmpfs is using it all.
In
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:16:35 -0500, Dale wrote:
Speaking of tmpfs, I should have re-emerged OOo on tmpfs. It filled up
/var and died, just a few minutes before it would have finished. Oh
well, I'll make /var bigger next time. Maybe a couple more Gbs. I put
that http-replicator on here
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:56, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Okay, reading up [1] [2], it seems I have to first upgrade logrotate to =
3.8.0
[1] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-apps/portage
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374287
When I return from my late-lunch,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson
Another good trick I've found on the forums
On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1
Can someone confirm this?
I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel - AMD
Helmut.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:58:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have 16Gbs here. It's not like I'm going to run out or anything. I
can
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1
Can someone confirm this?
I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel - AMD
Helmut.
Can you elaborate
On 07/28/2011 11:51:29 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1
Can someone confirm this?
I don't think so. It's part of
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:16:35 -0500, Dale wrote:
Speaking of tmpfs, I should have re-emerged OOo on tmpfs. It filled up
/var and died, just a few minutes before it would have finished. Oh
well, I'll make /var bigger next time. Maybe a couple more Gbs. I put
that
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2011)
# Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
# app-office/openoffice -
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2011)
# Old
Background:
I worked on this last April can gave up on the (livedDVD)
install with too many other things to do, and pissed off at
a lack of usable (current) documentation.
Currently:
Meds have kicked in ( peace and joy ) (yea right).
So, taking a fresh look at the BOTCHED system:
The 2 drives
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org
I have some old kernel trees here.. But there is no Makefiles for
some of them. I did not remove the Makefiles. There is anyone
having the same problem? Whats happen?
I emerge -NuD periodically, some times I see my kernel
being updated.. May portage remove my Makefiles??
--
Do or do not...
Yeap there is a version for windows and it works fine. :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
#
On Thursday 28 July 2011 11:53:04 Daniel Hilst Selli did opine thusly:
I have some old kernel trees here.. But there is no Makefiles for
some of them. I did not remove the Makefiles. There is anyone
having the same problem? Whats happen?
I emerge -NuD periodically, some times I see my kernel
On Thursday 28 July 2011 01:47:12 walt wrote:
On 07/27/2011 08:01 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
If you allow tmpfs to be backed by swap...
Does that require some extra configuration?
Nope. You just define swap and tmpfs in your fstab. Here are my entries:
$ grep swap /etc/fstab
/dev/sda3
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and
on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
my system but I
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
Hi All,
I installed e17 and at the first login everything worked but the fonts
were unreadable. I can't decide they are only to small or the font
type is the problem. I tried to figure out what is the problem and I
found this [1] in the Arch Linux Wiki. I installed both fonts but
nothing happened
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
I don't use tmpfs any more, as 8G of RAM is barely enough to run
KDE here.
I run KDE here and it uses less than 1Gbs all the time. Most of the
time it hovers around 1Gb with a lot of junk open. If your used
On 2011-07-28, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?
Both took hours, but beyond that, I didn't pay much attention.
and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
A few
Alex Schuster wrote:
I made some screenshots [*] after I started with an empty .kde4 directory
one week ago. They show what is started automatically when I log into KDE,
well, except for the last desktop where I fired up a browser for online
banking.
Desktop 1: Administration stuff. A Konsole
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
http://www.wonkology.org/comp/desktop/2011-07-24/desktop6.png
You might want to remove that one. Look closely at the bank screen.
That's okay, this is not really my account number, although very close :)
But even if it were, I guess it wouldn't be too
On Thursday 28 July 2011 19:14:07 Alex Schuster wrote:
Desktop 4: Remote. I go here when I administrate remote systems, via ssh
in a Konsole, RDesktop, or NX. The folder views have shortcuts to start
NX/Rdesktop/VPN sessions, or Dophins opening FTP locations and such.
Is that Bow Fell
On Thursday 28 July 2011 20:06:09 Alex Schuster wrote:
I'll wait a little and then upgrade to 4.7, and then I'll decide if I stay
with it. If not, the question would be what to use instead, I would miss
so many things.
Me too. I'm sure you wouldn't like gnome: it has far too much of the
On Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:57:28 András Csányi did opine thusly:
Hi All,
I installed e17 and at the first login everything worked but the
fonts were unreadable. I can't decide they are only to small or the
font type is the problem. I tried to figure out what is the problem
and I found
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
http://www.wonkology.org/comp/desktop/2011-07-24/desktop6.png
You might want to remove that one. Look closely at the bank screen.
That's okay, this is not really my account number, although very close :)
But even if
On 07/27/2011 05:23 PM, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
I hit the wrong button. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
Ah, that explains the names 'fireball' and 'smoker'?
Alan McKinnon: writes:
I only know of 2 e17 users here.
I was an Enlightenment user for years, before I finally gave KDE
3.something a try. I ran it under the Gnome environment, but only one of
my 3x3 vortual desktops actually showed the Gnome desktop. Which I
liked, I did my multimedia stuff
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-07-28, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?
Both took hours, but beyond that, I didn't pay much attention.
My build took about 3.3Gbs of
Michael Mol wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:58:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have 16Gbs here. It's not like I'm going to run out or anything. I can
put half on tmpfs and still have 8Gbs left.
walt wrote:
On 07/27/2011 05:23 PM, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
I hit the wrong button. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
Ah, that explains the names 'fireball' and 'smoker'?
Smoker is my first machine. It was smokin for its day. Since this
machine is a LOT faster, I had to come
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 14:38:01 Dale wrote:
How do you tell KDE that you want a widget thingy on one desktop and not all
of them?
Settings - workspace behavior - Virtual Desktops - Tick diffrent widgets
for each desktop
in earlier kde versions when they were trying to figure out what to do
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-07-28, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?
Both took hours, but beyond that, I
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 19:14:07 Alex Schuster wrote:
Desktop 4: Remote. I go here when I administrate remote systems, via ssh
in a Konsole, RDesktop, or NX. The folder views have shortcuts to start
NX/Rdesktop/VPN sessions, or Dophins opening FTP locations and such.
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 17:18:19 James Wall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a update. Let's see what folks think about this situation. I
mentioned in another thread that I did a from scratch kernel. It was a
On 07/27/2011 10:19 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/26/2011 06:07 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Anyone here knows at what time the Gentoo IRC channels are usually active?
In UTC, if possible :)
(Still can't wrap my head around USA time
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:14:09 Dale wrote:
I guess lightening will be next.
No, no, no. Lightning, please. Quite a different word (the cause of thunder,
as against a lifting of the ambient light level).
Or maybe that's another simplification in the American language. I can't
keep up with
On Thursday, 28 July 2011 22:27:48 Alex Schuster did opine thusly:
Probably not. The image file name is citrusdal.jpg, this is the name
of a small town in South Aftica as Wikipedia tells me.
It's a nice town. In season, you can buy the most fantastic oranges
there that you ever tasted.
--
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:14:09 Dale wrote:
I guess lightening will be next.
No, no, no. Lightning, please. Quite a different word (the cause of thunder,
as against a lifting of the ambient light level).
Or maybe that's another simplification in the American
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:27:48 Alex Schuster wrote:
I would need many more desktops then. How many do you have?
Mostly I have six, but when I'm in a major redevelopment phase of my web
site that goes up to eight.
So you also use activities? I don't, and I think they don't suit me as I
Paul Hartman wrote:
Here is mine:
Wed May 25 10:07:18 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.3.2
merge time: 34 minutes and 10 seconds.
On my Intel Core i7 920 with 12GB of RAM using tmpfs. :)
Do those merge times include download time? I wonder...
I have wondered that too.
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:33:22 walt wrote:
Another one showed up on most days wearing mis-matched socks. When asked
why he did this he replied, Why? Does it matter?
Did you ask him who combed his hair shirt?
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23
On Thursday, 28 July 2011 13:33:22 walt did opine thusly:
On 07/27/2011 10:19 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/26/2011 06:07 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Anyone here knows at what time the Gentoo IRC channels are
usually active?
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
http://www.wonkology.org/comp/desktop/2011-07-24/desktop6.png
You might want to remove that one. Look closely at the bank screen.
That's okay, this is not really my account number, although very close :)
But
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonly blah first, then start the real work.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter 5290,
walt writes:
Another one showed up on most days wearing mis-matched socks. When asked why
he did this he replied, Why? Does it matter?
Hey, I'm also wearing mis-matched socks right now :) But of course I
always wear a wrist-watch. A digital one.
Well, I still can't answer his question...
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonly blah first, then start the real work.
I have acron job
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonlyblah first, then start the real work.
But if you
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge
On 07/28/2011 01:14 PM, Dale wrote:
walt wrote:
On 07/27/2011 05:23 PM, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
I hit the wrong button. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
Ah, that explains the names 'fireball' and 'smoker'?
Smoker is my first machine. It was smokin for its day. Since this
machine is
walt wrote:
Oops, I got it completely wrong, then. Amongst hardware geeks there is
an old (maybe obsolete?) expression it's time for the smoke-test! which
means: plug it in and turn it on -- and then note carefully where the
plume of smoke is coming from :)
You're obviously too young to
walt writes:
On 07/28/2011 01:14 PM, Dale wrote:
walt wrote:
Ah, that explains the names 'fireball' and 'smoker'?
Smoker is my first machine. It was smokin for its day. Since this
machine is a LOT faster, I had to come up with something good for it
too. Fireball is it. I guess
Dale writes:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonlyblah first, then start the real work.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
And I could play the
ancient spacewars game once again.
Star Control? Wing Commander? hmm :)
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives
file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may
explain why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as far as
reading goes.
Thoughts? How do I check/change it? Headed to some man pages
On 01/-10/37 11:59, James wrote:
Background:
I worked on this last April can gave up on the (livedDVD)
install with too many other things to do, and pissed off at
a lack of usable (current) documentation.
So, taking a fresh look at the BOTCHED system:
The 2 drives are identical 2TB:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:37:24PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my
drives file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are
called?
That usually won't throw a kernel panic. That usually just gives an
error.
W
--
Willie W. Wong
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives file
system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may explain
why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as far as reading goes.
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives file
system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may explain
why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as
Willie Wong wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:37:24PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my
drives file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are
called?
That usually won't throw a kernel panic. That usually just gives an
error.
W
1) Is the filesystem mounted read-only?
Dale, usually you'd check this by running mount without arguments, and
looking to see if the options have ro or rw listed;
eg
adam@rix ~ $ mount
rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
/dev/root on / type reiserfs (rw,noatime)
none on /proc type proc (rw,relatime)
Dale, usually you'd check this by running mount without arguments, and
looking to see if the options have ro or rw listed;
Sorry - didnt read your post correctly. Obviously you already know this.
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds
Adam Carter wrote:
Dale, usually you'd check this by running mount without arguments, and
looking to see if the options have ro or rw listed;
Sorry - didnt read your post correctly. Obviously you already know this.
Doesn't hurt to mention things sometimes. There are things I
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:10 -0500, Dale wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:58:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have 16Gbs here. It's not like I'm going to run out or
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
fdisk does have a partition/drive limit of ~2.2TB, but this drive should
still work with it. The only other option is GPT, but I don't think grub
boots from that yet (unless you use grub2 with patches?)
grub in Gentoo
80 matches
Mail list logo
