On 26/02/2014 21:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is for those of use who to choose to roll our kernels by hand...
>
> So, am I missing something?
>
> Given the most recent gentoo news item:
>
>> # eselect news read 10
>> 2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
>> Title Upgrade
On 27 Feb 2014 08:06, "Lee" wrote:
>
> Hi, I always need to reconnect my laptop pcmcia wireless card to my WAP
when awaking from suspend. It would be nice if I could add two commands,
ifconfig and dhpcd, to the script which controls awaking from suspend.
Anyone know which file I can edit?
I don't
Hi, I always need to reconnect my laptop pcmcia wireless card to my WAP
when awaking from suspend. It would be nice if I could add two commands,
ifconfig and dhpcd, to the script which controls awaking from suspend.
Anyone know which file I can edit?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nicolas Sebrecht:
> The 26/02/14, hasufell wrote:
>
>> I wasn't only talking about modules and yes... loading them on
>> demand actually proves my point.
>
> No. We are talking about servers.
>
I am aware of that. Please read the whole discussion
wraeth wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> I hate when you have to enable something else for the one you are
>> looking for to show up.
> Pro-tip:
> In menuconfig you can press "z" to show all available kernel options
> regardless of their dependency state. This means that items that are
> hidden b
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I hate when you have to enable something else for the one you are
> looking for to show up.
Pro-tip:
In menuconfig you can press "z" to show all available kernel options
regardless of their dependency state. This means that items that are
hidden because of unmet dependenci
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On the first system I tried to do this on, I needed to enable that option
> before the FHANDLE option
even showed up.
I hate when you have to enable something else for the one you are
looking for to show up. < picture emoticon banging head on brick wall >
Dale
:-) :-)
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:41:22 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > Run make menuconfig
> > Press /
> > Type FHANDLE
> >
> > Then you can see it is enabled by switching on systemd support in the
> > Gentoo specific options.
>
> I did say that I know how to search - that is how I was able to find it.
On 2/26/2014 3:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Run make menuconfig
> Press /
> Type FHANDLE
>
> Then you can see it is enabled by switching on systemd support in the
> Gentoo specific options.
I did say that I know how to search - that is how I was able to find it.
But... I don't WANT to switch o
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:58:44 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> I had to find the first one (CONFIG_FHANDLE) by:
>
> 1. grepping .config, seeing it wasn't enabled,
> 2. running make menuconfig and searching for 'FHANDLE',
> 3. seeing it is located in 'General setup',
And seeing that the prompt for it is
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is for those of use who to choose to roll our kernels by hand...
>
> So, am I missing something?
>
> Given the most recent gentoo news item:
>
>> # eselect news read 10
>> 2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
>> Title
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:32:32AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> Is it like perl? Support every possible way to do something if it
> remotely makes sense to do it, no matter how bizarre the syntax?
The (d)evolution of perl reminds me of what's happened to Firefox,
GNOME, and KDE. To paraphrase
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:58:44 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Given the most recent gentoo news item:
>
> > # eselect news read 10
> > 2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
> > Title Upgrade to >=sys-fs/udev-210
> > AuthorSamuli Suominen
> > Posted20
Hello all,
This is for those of use who to choose to roll our kernels by hand...
So, am I missing something?
Given the most recent gentoo news item:
# eselect news read 10
2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
Title Upgrade to >=sys-fs/udev-210
AuthorSamuli Suom
The 26/02/14, hasufell wrote:
> I wasn't only talking about modules and yes... loading them on demand
> actually proves my point.
No. We are talking about servers.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nicolas Sebrecht:
> The 21/02/14, hasufell wrote:
>
>> So you are saying compiling a minimal kernel to minimize exposure
>> to subsystem bugs is only obscurity? (I really wonder what Greg
>> would say to this)
>
> Developers made the kernel to rely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alan McKinnon:
> On 21/02/2014 16:15, hasufell wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon:
>>> On 20/02/2014 22:41, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:52:07PM +0400, Andrew Savchenko
wrote:
> And this point is one of the highest sec
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 21/02/14, hasufell wrote:
>
>> So you are saying compiling a minimal kernel to minimize exposure to
>> subsystem bugs is only obscurity? (I really wonder what Greg would say
>> to this)
>
> Developers made the kernel to rely on modules
2014-02-26 9:30 GMT-03:00 Francisco Ares :
> 2014-02-26 8:54 GMT-03:00 David M. Fellows :
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:12:35 -0300
>> Francisco Ares wrote -
>> > --001a113311e686e7f304f34d4a39
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > It has been for a while, now: ev
2014-02-26 8:54 GMT-03:00 David M. Fellows :
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:12:35 -0300
> Francisco Ares wrote -
> > --001a113311e686e7f304f34d4a39
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It has been for a while, now: every now and then, when updating a perl
> > module, it
2014-02-26 8:54 GMT-03:00 Neil Bothwick :
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:12:35 -0300, Francisco Ares wrote:
>
> > At first I thought it was a one and only case. But as time goes by,
> > there has been perl packages that refuse to emerge at first, and then,
> > checking the emerge log, finding missing m
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:12:35 -0300
Francisco Ares wrote -
> --001a113311e686e7f304f34d4a39
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi All,
>
> It has been for a while, now: every now and then, when updating a perl
> module, it fails to emerge. Checking the log, it is possible to see
> s
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:12:35 -0300, Francisco Ares wrote:
> At first I thought it was a one and only case. But as time goes by,
> there has been perl packages that refuse to emerge at first, and then,
> checking the emerge log, finding missing modules and manually emerging
> them, everything goes
The 21/02/14, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Are you considering Bruce Schneier's advice as a stupid nonsense? In
> his "Applied cryptography" he recommended one of the ways to
> straighten a system: to use not so frequently used algorithms instead
> of selected standards because less frequently used a
Hi All,
It has been for a while, now: every now and then, when updating a perl
module, it fails to emerge. Checking the log, it is possible to see
something like this, when I tied to update dev-perl/File-MimeInfo :
...
Checking prerequisites...
requires:
! File::BaseDir is not installed
The 21/02/14, hasufell wrote:
> So you are saying compiling a minimal kernel to minimize exposure to
> subsystem bugs is only obscurity? (I really wonder what Greg would say
> to this)
Developers made the kernel to rely on modules. Distributions relies on
them. Since they are almost always loaded
The 21/02/14, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Any decent security setup contains multiple layers of protection.
> Use of non-standard binaries, algorithms or implementations is just
> one of them and it is the simplest math to prove that security is
> _improved_ this way.
The algorithms and implementa
Am 21.02.2014 23:43, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> And now with 209 there is a new systemd-networkd deamon that is started
>> by default even if not configured or used.
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTYxMTI
>
> $ ./configure --help | grep networkd
> --disable-networ
The 25/02/14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Perhaps they are starting small? I don't know;
I'm pretty sure they are. BTW, things are moving fast and the state
has already changed since my last check (not so old).
>from what I've read,
> they want s
The 26/02/14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Sabayon uses binary packages, isn't?
Yes.
> Then eselect perhaps uninstalls
> some packages and installs others?
I don't know the code, sorry. Since I've already tried the
'eselect init' command, I'm pretty sure it
30 matches
Mail list logo
