hello again ... noone interested? ;-)
I understand in a way ...
Maybe I have something in the kernel misconfigured ...
Right now I get these messages again:
[ 1998.118658] hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts
Should I disable HPET in the BIOS and/or via kernel command line?
I never know how to set
Is there a way to display that 'failed logins' message without using
gdm/kdm/xdm?
Hello,
See that : http://linux.die.net/man/8/faillog
I am not on my Gentoo machine so I don't know if the faillog file is
really present.
With this, you just have to make a script with Bash / faillog / awk.
On 05/27/2014 02:03 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think I have some IO-topic going on ... very likely some mismatch of
block sizes ... the hw-raid, then LVM, then the snapshot on top of
that ... and a filesystem with properties as target ... oh my. Chosing
noop as IO-scheduler helps a bit
On 06/11/2014 10:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 11:19, schrieb thegeezer:
Hi Stefan,
block size / stripe size mismatches only really penalise random io, if
you are trying to use dd and have slow speeds this would suggest
something else is awry.
I don't know the c600 rad
On 06/11/2014 11:14 AM, thegeezer wrote:
just some extra thoughts
*cough* yeah i meant to keep typing!
the extra thoughts are that the better way of doing this would be to
create up
RAID1 physicaldisks1+2
RAID6 physicaldisks3,4,5,6
then put lvm on there as vg01 with two PVs, one on the raid1
Am 11.06.2014 12:14, schrieb thegeezer:
Basically 3 RAID-6 hw-raids over 6 SAS hdds.
OK so i'm confused again. RAID6 requires minimum of 4 drives.
if you have 3 raid6's then you would need 12 drives (coffee hasn't quite
activated in me yet so my maths may not be right)
or do you have
On 06/11/2014 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 12:14, schrieb thegeezer:
Basically 3 RAID-6 hw-raids over 6 SAS hdds.
OK so i'm confused again. RAID6 requires minimum of 4 drives.
if you have 3 raid6's then you would need 12 drives (coffee hasn't quite
activated in me
Am 11.06.2014 12:41, schrieb thegeezer:
everything around 380 MB/s ... only ~350 MB/s for
/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 (which still is nice)
OK here is the clue.
if the LVs are also showing such fast speed, then please can you show
your command that you are trying to run that is so slow ?
On 06/11/2014 11:49 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 12:41, schrieb thegeezer:
everything around 380 MB/s ... only ~350 MB/s for
/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 (which still is nice)
OK here is the clue.
if the LVs are also showing such fast speed, then please can you show
your
On 06/11/2014 11:49 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 12:41, schrieb thegeezer:
everything around 380 MB/s ... only ~350 MB/s for
/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 (which still is nice)
OK here is the clue.
if the LVs are also showing such fast speed, then please can you show
your
Am 11.06.2014 13:01, schrieb thegeezer:
yeah this is very very odd.
firstly there should not be such discrepancy between hdparm -t and dd if=
secondly you would imagine that the first dd would be cached and so
would be faster the second time round
please check for the turbo boost disable,
Am 11.06.2014 13:18, schrieb thegeezer:
just out of curiosity, what happens if you do # dd
if=/dev/vg01/amhold of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100 # dd if=/dev/sdc
of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
booze ~ # dd if=/dev/vg01/amhold of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
100+0 Datensätze ein
100+0 Datensätze aus
Hi,
I am trying to install Gentoo on a x64 system with such processor, that, as
far as I could understand, is like to have the chipset embedded, so the
buses to video, pci express, usb, etc, comes out of the processor chip.
The kernel from the 3.10 series were not able to correctly handle this
P.S.:
here is the output of lspci -k
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation ValleyView SSA-CUnit (rev 0c)
Subsystem: Biostar Microtech Int'l Corp Device
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation ValleyView Gen7 (rev
0c)
Subsystem: Biostar Microtech Int'l Corp
On 06/11/2014 12:21 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 13:18, schrieb thegeezer:
just out of curiosity, what happens if you do # dd
if=/dev/vg01/amhold of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100 # dd if=/dev/sdc
of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
booze ~ # dd if=/dev/vg01/amhold of=/dev/null
Am 11.06.2014 13:52, schrieb thegeezer:
ok baffling.
sdc i already said would be slower but not this much slower
it certainly should not be slower than the lvm that sits on top of it!
i can't see anything in the cgroups that stands out, maybe someone else
can give a better voice to this.
On 10 June 2014 21:33:28 CEST, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/10/14 22:50, the wrote:
On 06/10/14 22:37, Joseph wrote:
I mount USB stick form camera and I can not change ownership (I'm
login as root)
drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 32768 Nov 18 2013 DCIM -rwxr-xr-x 1 root
root 4 Nov 21
Hi there,
I'm using Gentoo ~amd64 on my NAS.
This is my setup:
Mainboard - Asus E35M1
CPU - AMD E350
HDD - 1x 500GiB WD Caviar Green WD5000AADS (root)
HDD - 4x 3TiB WD Caviar Green WD30EZRX (Raid10)
As these hard drives are desktop hard drives and not designed for 24/7
purposes, I want to spin
On 06/11/2014 01:41 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 13:52, schrieb thegeezer:
ok baffling.
sdc i already said would be slower but not this much slower
it certainly should not be slower than the lvm that sits on top of it!
i can't see anything in the cgroups that stands out,
On 06/11/2014 02:12 PM, Ralf wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using Gentoo ~amd64 on my NAS.
This is my setup:
Mainboard - Asus E35M1
CPU - AMD E350
HDD - 1x 500GiB WD Caviar Green WD5000AADS (root)
HDD - 4x 3TiB WD Caviar Green WD30EZRX (Raid10)
As these hard drives are desktop hard drives and not
Am 11.06.2014 15:32, schrieb thegeezer:
So my kernel-config seems buggy or I should downgrade to something older?
I suspect that in your fully running system somethingelse(tm) is
stealing the activity. can you start up with no services enabled and
do the test ?
hm, yes. although I had
On 06/11/14 11:33, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 10 June 2014 21:33:28 CEST, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/10/14 22:50, the wrote:
On 06/10/14 22:37, Joseph wrote:
I mount USB stick form camera and I can not change ownership (I'm
login as root)
drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 32768 Nov 18 2013
On Wed, 11 June 2014, at 2:52 pm, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
...
If you give the filesystem a Label. Then udisks will use that instead of the
UUID string.
Thanks.
What is the best way to edit USB Label?
$ apropos label
e2label (8) - Change the label on an ext2/ext3/ext4
On 06/11/2014 03:40 PM, thegeezer wrote:
50 seconds is very small timeout, be wary of spinup/spindown cycles
which imho are worse than always spinning.
For sure, I know, this was only for testing purposes, to see if it
works. I don't want to wait ten minutes, or even an hour to see that it
Am 11.06.2014 15:44, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 11.06.2014 15:32, schrieb thegeezer:
So my kernel-config seems buggy or I should downgrade to something older?
I suspect that in your fully running system somethingelse(tm) is
stealing the activity. can you start up with no services
On 06/11/2014 03:15 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 15:44, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 11.06.2014 15:32, schrieb thegeezer:
So my kernel-config seems buggy or I should downgrade to something older?
I suspect that in your fully running system somethingelse(tm) is
stealing
On 11/06/14 08:14, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. Does anyone have a clue as to why v86d should suddenly start being
very cpu intensive on my computer? When I first boot its fine (using
either systemd or openrc), but after a while -- maybe a day or two it
starts using up lots of cpu and
covici at ccs.covici.com writes:
Hi. Does anyone have a clue as to why v86d should suddenly start being
very cpu intensive on my computer? When I first boot its fine (using
either systemd or openrc), but after a while -- maybe a day or two it
starts using up lots of cpu and definitely
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:52:23 -0600, Joseph wrote:
What is the best way to edit USB Label?
For the DOS filesystem, mlabel, part of sys-fs/mtools.
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 19: Passive aggression
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
covici at ccs.covici.com writes:
Hi. Does anyone have a clue as to why v86d should suddenly start being
very cpu intensive on my computer? When I first boot its fine (using
either systemd or openrc), but after a while -- maybe a day or two it
On 11/06/14 17:49, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Thanks. I have a fairly old kernel for other reasons and I installed
v86d in 2011 and it has not changed since. I use udesafb because I
want a frame buffer so I can get a lot more than 80x25 in a virtual
console. Iget 64x160. I also need
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:52:23 -0600, Joseph wrote:
What is the best way to edit USB Label?
For the DOS filesystem, mlabel, part of sys-fs/mtools.
Or fatlabel, from sys-fs/dosfstools.
looks promising:
virt-backup dumps and packs a 12 GB image-file within ~145 seconds to a
non-compressing btrfs subvolume:
a) does a LVM-snapshot
b) dd with bs=4M and through pigz to the target file
The bigger LV with ~250GB is running right now.
The system feels snappier than with the old
On 06/11/14 11:31, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:52:23 -0600, Joseph wrote:
What is the best way to edit USB Label?
For the DOS filesystem, mlabel, part of sys-fs/mtools.
Or fatlabel, from
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
like that driver. I can't remember what it complained about, but it
means no X at all.
If you're not booting in EFI mode, then you can use vesafb instead. This
doesn't require v86d and doesn't even require an initrd.
uvesafb is mostly
On 06/11/2014 07:57 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
looks promising:
awesome. i did have a look through the diff, there are lots of scsi
drivers selected, storage (block) cgroups but i think the crucial factor
was the HZ was set at 100 previously and 1000 now. i guess it has
helped kernel-io
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
like that driver. I can't remember what it complained about, but it
means no X at all.
If you're not booting in EFI mode, then you can use vesafb instead. This
doesn't require v86d and doesn't
On 06/11/2014 01:56 AM, Florian HEGRON wrote:
Is there a way to display that 'failed logins' message without using
gdm/kdm/xdm?
Hello,
See that : http://linux.die.net/man/8/faillog
I am not on my Gentoo machine so I don't know if the faillog file is really
present.
Very good clue,
38 matches
Mail list logo
