[gentoo-user] Re: wayland
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes: Anyone playing with wayland already? Not yet. Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. Maybe even using it as daily driver ? I did some steps to compile and use it on my systems ... so far I wasn't able to start up gnome 3.12 (~ gnome-shell) with gdm here. Is it possible already? This might help [1] Stefan [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland hth, James
[gentoo-user] Re: Networkmanager on uclibc Gentoo system x86
João Jerónimo joao.jeronimo.89 at gmail.com writes: Hello. I installed the uclibc stage3 tarball no a x86 machine (I chose uclibc because the PC has only 256 MB of RAM). Did you use one of these to install your system? http://mirror.as24220.net/pub/gentoo/experimental/x86/uclibc/ Also note: The i586 CPU (family 5) but it has almost everything that a i686 CPU (family 6) has. The only CPU instruction that is missing is the NOPL or NOP Long (means no operation). Now there is a patch available that simulate the missing instruction in the kernel so that the user space don't know that the instruction is missing. The program can use the instruction as if there is nothing missing instead of crashing. The advantage is, the programs that are compiled for i686 can run on the i586 CPU with this modified Kernel. In Debian there is also a special optimized C Lib version for i686 CPU's (with uses cmov instructions). This optimized version of the library works with the modified Kernel too. For more info's go to http://notes.osuv.de/doku.php?id=geode. hth, James
[gentoo-user] capturing emerge output
Hello, I have some very large emerge builds going on with my /usr/local/portage experiments. What would folks suggest is the best way to capture the output from the screen into a file (fancy formating?) as well as being able see the local builds as they scroll the build out to the terminal (screen) window (normal emerge results viewed fromt the terminal session ? Is there some tools (ebuilds) for such? Then what tools exist for parsing via a gui. (yea I still use command line parsing visually but I figure I ask if there are some fancy tools for an old C hack to experiment around with.. TIA, James
Re: [gentoo-user] capturing emerge output
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Hello, I have some very large emerge builds going on with my /usr/local/portage experiments. What would folks suggest is the best way to capture the output from the screen into a file (fancy formating?) as well as being able see the local builds as they scroll the build out to the terminal (screen) window (normal emerge results viewed fromt the terminal session ? Is there some tools (ebuilds) for such? Then what tools exist for parsing via a gui. (yea I still use command line parsing visually but I figure I ask if there are some fancy tools for an old C hack to experiment around with.. I use script all the time and just say--nocolor and --nospinner (syntax may be off a bit) as well. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] capturing emerge output
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:54 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: What would folks suggest is the best way to capture the output from the screen into a file (fancy formating?) as well as being able see the local builds as they scroll the build out to the terminal (screen) window (normal emerge results viewed fromt the terminal session ? sounds like a job for 'tee' -- Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com) Twitter: @hunleyd Web: about.me/douglas_hunley G+: http://google.com/+DouglasHunley
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: wayland
Am 21.07.2014 15:54, schrieb James: Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes: Anyone playing with wayland already? Not yet. Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. Maybe even using it as daily driver ? I did some steps to compile and use it on my systems ... so far I wasn't able to start up gnome 3.12 (~ gnome-shell) with gdm here. Is it possible already? This might help [1] Stefan [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland hmm, thanks ... I am not sure how to apply this ;-) You suggest that by running QtWayland I might be able to run gnome with wayland? S
Re: [gentoo-user] capturing emerge output
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:54:36 + (UTC), James wrote: What would folks suggest is the best way to capture the output from the screen into a file (fancy formating?) as well as being able see the local builds as they scroll the build out to the terminal (screen) window (normal emerge results viewed fromt the terminal session ? Set PORT_LOGDIR in make.conf. This is not the same as the ELOG settings, it logs the entire output from the ebuild. -- Neil Bothwick Approx. 1 in 36000 people will break a leg within 3 weeks of reading this post signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: wayland
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes: Anyone playing with wayland already? Not yet. Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. This might help [1] [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland hmm, thanks ... I am not sure how to apply this Most Desktops will be a while before interacting with Wayland, let alone supporting it natively, imho. Bloatware like gnome and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a myriad of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho. You suggest that by running QtWayland I might be able to run gnome with wayland? I don't 'gnome' or 'kde' anything anymore. Those bloated, security risks will be the last ones to support Wayland, imho. LXQT(5) is way ahead on Wayland, as they already have testing version of lxqt running on qt5 (grep this list archives for discussions). LXQt Got Full Support For Qt5. Wayland Support Will Be Soon Added http://linuxg.net/lxqt-got-full-support-for-qt5-wayland-support-will-be-soon-added/ Best to the site for help, as I'm not on the razor's edge with LXQT. I'm working on other stuff for a few more weeks.. Skinny (LXQT5) is the new PHAT. Join the revolution. LXQT is up to 13 devs now. Project is 'on fire', so pull up a seat, and get roasted! hth, James
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: wayland
Am 21.07.2014 23:40, schrieb James: Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes: Anyone playing with wayland already? Not yet. Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. This might help [1] [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland hmm, thanks ... I am not sure how to apply this Most Desktops will be a while before interacting with Wayland, let alone supporting it natively, imho. Bloatware like gnome and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a myriad of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho. You suggest that by running QtWayland I might be able to run gnome with wayland? I don't 'gnome' or 'kde' anything anymore. Those bloated, security risks will be the last ones to support Wayland, imho. LXQT(5) is way ahead on Wayland, as they already have testing version of lxqt running on qt5 (grep this list archives for discussions). LXQt Got Full Support For Qt5. Wayland Support Will Be Soon Added http://linuxg.net/lxqt-got-full-support-for-qt5-wayland-support-will-be-soon-added/ Best to the site for help, as I'm not on the razor's edge with LXQT. I'm working on other stuff for a few more weeks.. Skinny (LXQT5) is the new PHAT. Join the revolution. LXQT is up to 13 devs now. Project is 'on fire', so pull up a seat, and get roasted! hth, James who told you that 'bloated' buzz word? The same people who told you about 'the cloud' or 'web 2.0'?
[gentoo-user] Re: capturing emerge output
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes: What would folks suggest is the best way to capture the output from the screen into a file (fancy formating?) as well as being able see the local builds as they scroll the build out to the terminal (screen) window (normal emerge results viewed fromt the terminal session ? Set PORT_LOGDIR in make.conf. This is not the same as the ELOG settings, it logs the entire output from the ebuild. This sound workable. If I don't want something logged, just comment out the PORT_LGDIR in make.conf, or is there a way on the Command line to toggle this on and off, without manually editing the file? I assume there is a unique log file for each separate ebuild. Where do I read up on PORTDIR (documentation) referred to in man make.conf ? James
[gentoo-user] Re: wayland
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes: who told you that 'bloated' buzz word? The same people who told you about 'the cloud' or 'web 2.0'? Nobody, common sense from practicle experience. Here's what you *should* do to experince just how bloated most desktops have become. Build up a minimize workstation and compile some big codes under gnome_bloat or KDE_lead_sinker and then compile the same code on a light weight workstation of equal resources. BLOAT is ok if you got all day. Becoming aquaited with tons of ram that is not being suck_dry by the desktop, is a mind altering experince.. try it, you might like it... Anyway, I'm moving to a 3 monitor setup (3 27 samsungs) as soon as I fine a triple monitor mount for 27. Then I'll have 2 worksations under them, so I might put up a bloatware desktop, just to remind me how sluggish they are hahahahahahaha... peace, James
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: capturing emerge output
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:01:44 + (UTC), James wrote: Set PORT_LOGDIR in make.conf. This is not the same as the ELOG settings, it logs the entire output from the ebuild. This sound workable. If I don't want something logged, just comment out the PORT_LGDIR in make.conf, or is there a way on the Command line to toggle this on and off, without manually editing the file? PORT_LOGDIR= emerge something? I assume there is a unique log file for each separate ebuild. There is, the format is documented in man make.conf Where do I read up on PORTDIR (documentation) referred to in man make.conf ? PORTDIR is *very* different from PORT_LOGDIR, but both are documented on man make.conf. -- Neil Bothwick WinErr 013: Unexpected error - Huh ? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
