Re: [gentoo-user] Dolphin and adding a option, if it exists.

[Dale]

Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:10:52 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote:
>>
>>> This is probably a case of Dolphin not being a good tool, unless it
>>> has a built-in command-line?
>>> $ mv newfile oldfile
>>> will overwrite the old file in place with the new file with the name
>>> of the old file.
>> And tab-completion makes this a lot quicker than renaming files in a file
>> manager.
>>
> This is a option I haven't thought of.  The mv command is a good
> thought.  Next time I have a lot of these to do, I'll try it.  It just
> may work.  Plus, tab completion would be a nice bonus.
>

I just got a couple dozen videos that I want to do what I described
with.  I used the -v option with mv plus double check in dolphin
afterwards and so far, it works nicely.  Tab completion makes it really
easy.  It's faster than all the properties window, copy, paste and all
that.  I might add, along with tab completion, I also use the highlight
and middle click on the mouse.  A faster way to copy and paste when
needed.  That's a nifty feature of Konsole.


>>> I know there are many file managers with a built-in terminal, so maybe
>>> others have similar possible solutions. I saw someone mention midnight
>>> commander which I believe is one.
>> Or you could use a drop-down terminal like Yakuake to give a terminal on
>> demand, whatever program you are using. Yakuake is for KDE, it wraps
>> Konsole, but there are GNOME-ish variants too, I wouldn't be without it.
>>
>>
> I look into Yakuake.  I've never heard of it before.  It's emerging and
> I have to run to town to help a friend.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-) 
>


I installed Yakuake and to me, it looks like Konsole but without the
menu part at the top.  Other than that, I don't see anything special.  I
kinda wish I had a terminal with dolphin or something.  I think there is
a way but right now, I'm getting the job done.  I'll look into that
later.  Pretty sure it is under the tool menu.

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] [RESOLVED] Change History of linux commands

[flzdjhmtax]

(resending with correct From: address)
n952162  writes:

> Am 07.10.22 um 16:25 schrieb n952162:
>> Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history of
>> linux commands?
>>
>> For example, the test(1) command used to have a regular-expression
>> parser built in.  No longer, and more surprising, there's no discussion
>> of its disappearance on the internet; that I can find, at any rate.
>>
>> I'd to know when it disappeared and what discussions, by whom, preceded
>> that.

> Sorry, I'm thinking of the expr(1) command.

The man pages (and source code) of old versions of UNIX can be found at

https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl

e.g. ("man 1 expr" from Jan 1992)
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V10/man/man1/expr.1

For more human readable output
$ cd tmp
$ cat > oldman.1

$ man  ./oldman.1

-- 
Alan J. Wylie  https://www.wylie.me.uk/

Dance like no-one's watching. / Encrypt like everyone is.
Security is inversely proportional to convenience

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Grant Taylor]

On 10/7/22 11:10 AM, Matt Connell wrote:
Was more just laughing at myself for having used equery so frequently 
for ~10 years and not knowing about the option.


Fair enough.

And if I was hiding it, I wouldn't have publicly replied that I 
learned it :)


TIL

You accidentally struck a button for me.  As the ... more experienced SA 
on teams for a while, I tend to not tolerate people hording / not 
sharing information and / or making fun of others for not knowing 
something.  So I counter this by actively promoting people learning 
things as a good thing.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Dale]

Matt Connell wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 17:47 +0200, tastytea wrote:
>> equery meta
> Ashamed to admit I learned of equery meta today.  I'd previously been
> relying on eix to find, say, the website associated with a package.
>
>


I just checked that out and it is nifty.  Now to remember the option
next time I need it.  :/  You were not alone in missing that option.  I
had no idea it was there either.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Matt Connell]

On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 11:04 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I think that being ashamed about not knowing something tends to promote 
> what I consider to be a negative stigmata that people should know 
> everything and that they should hide what they don't know.

Was more just laughing at myself for having used equery so frequently
for ~10 years and not knowing about the option.

And if I was hiding it, I wouldn't have publicly replied that I learned
it :)

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Grant Taylor]

On 10/7/22 10:23 AM, Philip Webb wrote:

There's the Wayback Machine, which tries to archive all I/net pages ever.


Sadly, there are a lot of pages that the Wayback Machine a.k.a. The 
Internet Archive doesn't have archived.  TIA / WM is a best effort 
system and is a lot better than not having anything at all.


I've never used it, but it should have copies of man pages going back, 
which would allow you to reconstruct the history of the commands.


I don't think that searching the internet for old copies of man pages is 
going to be as productive as one might hope.  First there's the SysV vs 
BSD lineage to account for.  Second there's all the other things that 
don't fall in the SysV / BSD camps, mostly older.


I'd suggest inquiring on the TUHS or COFF mailing lists for pointers to 
history of various commands.  You may very well be pointed to archived 
man pages.  But you'll also have comments from people who maintained 
commands and possibly added the option that you're most interested in.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Grant Taylor]

On 10/7/22 10:31 AM, Matt Connell wrote:
Ashamed to admit I learned of equery meta today.  I'd previously been 
relying on eix to find, say, the website associated with a package.


NEVER be ashamed to admit that you learned something.

Learning is a good thing.

It doesn't matter when you learn it as long as you do learn.

I think that being ashamed about not knowing something tends to promote 
what I consider to be a negative stigmata that people should know 
everything and that they should hide what they don't know.


I've been administering Linux professionally for more than two decades 
and I still learn new things weekly if not daily.


Help pull others up, don't hold them down by climbing on top of them.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Matt Connell]

On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 17:47 +0200, tastytea wrote:
> equery meta

Ashamed to admit I learned of equery meta today.  I'd previously been
relying on eix to find, say, the website associated with a package.

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Philip Webb]

On 10/7/22 8:25 AM, n952162 wrote:
> Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history
> of linux commands ?

There's the Wayback Machine, which tries to archive all I/net pages ever.
I've never used it, but it should have copies of man pages going back,
which would allow you to reconstruct the history of the commands.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca

RE: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Laurence Perkins]

> -Original Message-
> From: tastytea  
> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 8:48 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands
> 
> On 2022-10-07 17:25+0200 n952162  wrote:
> 
> > Am 07.10.22 um 16:56 schrieb Grant Taylor:
> > > On 10/7/22 8:25 AM, n952162 wrote:  
> > >> Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history 
> > >> of linux commands?
> > >
> > > Some man pages have history of commands in them.
> > >
> > > Admittedly, it seems as if man pages on Solaris and *BSD (I have 
> > > access to FreeBSD) tend to be better than Linux man page at this 
> > > aspect.
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > 
> > Well, the man page, yes, would be a good indicator, but the commands 
> > themselves?
> > 
> > Where does gentoo get the source to build  test(1) or expr(1) or 
> > date(1)?That's in some package, but where is the upstream source?
> > Is it something in github?  Or a linux portal?  Or Torvalds private 
> > server?  Or the gnu server?
> > 
> > 
> 
> /usr/bin/test[1] was installed by sys-apps/coreutils[2], it's homepage is 
> [3], that links to the source code 
> repository.
> 
> Other ways to find out:
>   - `equery meta sys-apps/coreutils`
>   - `less $(portageq get_repo_path / 
> gentoo)/sys-apps/coreutils/coreutils-8.32-r1.ebuild`
> 
> Kind regards, tastytea
> 
> [1] `whereis test`
> [2] `qfile /usr/bin/test` or `equery belongs /usr/bin/test` [3] `eix 
> sys-apps/coreutils` or emerge -s sys-apps/coreutils`
> 

Note also that several of these may have copies built into your shell for speed 
and so that you can update the system utilities without an outage.

"bash -c help" or "busybox --help" or similar to see the list.

LMP

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Michael Orlitzky]

On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 17:47 +0200, tastytea wrote:
> 
> 
> /usr/bin/test was installed by sys-apps/coreutils

If you're using bash, the "test" command is actually built-in to the
shell to avoid forking a million processes in every shell script.

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[n952162]

Am 07.10.22 um 17:47 schrieb tastytea:

On 2022-10-07 17:25+0200 n952162  wrote:


Am 07.10.22 um 16:56 schrieb Grant Taylor:

On 10/7/22 8:25 AM, n952162 wrote:

Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history
of linux commands?

Some man pages have history of commands in them.

Admittedly, it seems as if man pages on Solaris and *BSD (I have
access to FreeBSD) tend to be better than Linux man page at this
aspect.




Well, the man page, yes, would be a good indicator, but the commands
themselves?

Where does gentoo get the source to build  test(1) or expr(1) or
date(1)?    That's in some package, but where is the upstream source?
Is it something in github?  Or a linux portal?  Or Torvalds private
server?  Or the gnu server?



/usr/bin/test[1] was installed by sys-apps/coreutils[2], it's homepage
is [3], that links to the
source code repository.

Other ways to find out:
   - `equery meta sys-apps/coreutils`
   - `less $(portageq get_repo_path / 
gentoo)/sys-apps/coreutils/coreutils-8.32-r1.ebuild`

Kind regards, tastytea

[1] `whereis test`
[2] `qfile /usr/bin/test` or `equery belongs /usr/bin/test`
[3] `eix sys-apps/coreutils` or emerge -s sys-apps/coreutils`



Oh, that's good.  Thank you.

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[tastytea]

On 2022-10-07 17:25+0200 n952162  wrote:

> Am 07.10.22 um 16:56 schrieb Grant Taylor:
> > On 10/7/22 8:25 AM, n952162 wrote:  
> >> Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history
> >> of linux commands?  
> >
> > Some man pages have history of commands in them.
> >
> > Admittedly, it seems as if man pages on Solaris and *BSD (I have
> > access to FreeBSD) tend to be better than Linux man page at this
> > aspect.
> >
> >
> >  
> 
> Well, the man page, yes, would be a good indicator, but the commands
> themselves?
> 
> Where does gentoo get the source to build  test(1) or expr(1) or
> date(1)?    That's in some package, but where is the upstream source? 
> Is it something in github?  Or a linux portal?  Or Torvalds private
> server?  Or the gnu server?
> 
> 

/usr/bin/test[1] was installed by sys-apps/coreutils[2], it's homepage
is [3], that links to the
source code repository.

Other ways to find out:
  - `equery meta sys-apps/coreutils`
  - `less $(portageq get_repo_path / 
gentoo)/sys-apps/coreutils/coreutils-8.32-r1.ebuild`

Kind regards, tastytea

[1] `whereis test`
[2] `qfile /usr/bin/test` or `equery belongs /usr/bin/test`
[3] `eix sys-apps/coreutils` or emerge -s sys-apps/coreutils`

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[n952162]

Am 07.10.22 um 16:56 schrieb Grant Taylor:

On 10/7/22 8:25 AM, n952162 wrote:

Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history of
linux commands?


Some man pages have history of commands in them.

Admittedly, it seems as if man pages on Solaris and *BSD (I have
access to FreeBSD) tend to be better than Linux man page at this aspect.





Well, the man page, yes, would be a good indicator, but the commands
themselves?

Where does gentoo get the source to build  test(1) or expr(1) or
date(1)?    That's in some package, but where is the upstream source? 
Is it something in github?  Or a linux portal?  Or Torvalds private
server?  Or the gnu server?

Re: [gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[Grant Taylor]

On 10/7/22 8:25 AM, n952162 wrote:
Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history of 
linux commands?


Some man pages have history of commands in them.

Admittedly, it seems as if man pages on Solaris and *BSD (I have access 
to FreeBSD) tend to be better than Linux man page at this aspect.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

[gentoo-user] [RESOLVED] Change History of linux commands

[n952162]

Am 07.10.22 um 16:25 schrieb n952162:

Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history of
linux commands?

For example, the test(1) command used to have a regular-expression
parser built in.  No longer, and more surprising, there's no discussion
of its disappearance on the internet; that I can find, at any rate.

I'd to know when it disappeared and what discussions, by whom, preceded
that.




Sorry, I'm thinking of the expr(1) command.

[gentoo-user] Change History of linux commands

[n952162]

Can anybody tell me how I can look at the official change history of
linux commands?

For example, the test(1) command used to have a regular-expression
parser built in.  No longer, and more surprising, there's no discussion
of its disappearance on the internet; that I can find, at any rate.

I'd to know when it disappeared and what discussions, by whom, preceded
that.